Connecting propeller directly to Li-Po
average joe
Posts: 795
I've read several threads that suggest the propeller chip is tolerant of excess supply voltage. Tried searching for these threads but couldn't seem to find them.
I'm trying to eliminate the 3v3 regulator from a design powered by a Li-Po, with nominal voltage @3.6v. Reading the datasheet suggests this won't be a problem, until the battery is charged and providing 4.2v. That's only two tenths of a volt over absolute maximum listed on the propeller datasheet.
My questions for others who have done this:
#1. How well does the propeller handle 4.2v supply?
Any thoughts, recommendations, greatly appreciated!
I'm trying to eliminate the 3v3 regulator from a design powered by a Li-Po, with nominal voltage @3.6v. Reading the datasheet suggests this won't be a problem, until the battery is charged and providing 4.2v. That's only two tenths of a volt over absolute maximum listed on the propeller datasheet.
My questions for others who have done this:
#1. How well does the propeller handle 4.2v supply?
Any thoughts, recommendations, greatly appreciated!
Comments
-Phil
EDIT: And then I searched the forums and found this thread that may help.
You have got a reverse polarity protection diode, right, and a small series decoupling resistor ?
That will drop ~ 600mV
If you want to run down very low, and have any battery monitoring, you can flip the Diode for a P-FET-Diode, and enable the PFET when the battery sags and you need the 'last few drops'.
Low voltage Zeners are quite poor regulators, with a very soft knee. Best avoided as regulators.
I usually run everything 'in spec' but this specific design mandates NO REGULATOR! Perhaps a voltage-dropping diode?
The thread lanternfish pointed out suggests ADP2503 - ADP2504 and I will read up on this for possible future use.
So thoughts about using a voltage-dropping diode?
*edit*
While I was typing jmg came back with the lines I was thinking of. Current design DOES NOT have reverse polarity protect diode but was on the drawing board. I will need to think about this a bit as I'd like about 400mv drop. 600 complicates things slightly because there IS a regulator in the design, it just does not power the propeller. The regulator I'm using has a 400mv output switch drop and I'd like to match this fairly close.
-Phil
I think the diode/decoupling resistor solution will work quite well.
@jmg, The P-FET is brilliant and may go into a later design. Best to KISS at first!
'Seems ideal for your app.
-Phil
Reverse connected FETs make good ideal diodes.
If you have a larger regulator powering other items, then you could use a dual diode approach.
Use Series R + Silicon diode(s) for the Deep sleep mode, and Diode OR a schottky diode to the Buck output, so when that comes up, the Prop is never more than a Schottky diode drop away.
This suggestion is PERFECT, I think. I really like the propeller never being more than a schottky diode drop from buck regulator. This might help push voltages even lower and that would be GREAT for battery life. 2v8 to 3v0 is where I'll get the best consumption trends, but I had stuck with 3v3 due to difference in supplies.
Phil: I took a quick look at the regulator and "micropower shutdown" of 1ma is a bit higher than I'd like. Trying to keep sleep mode under a couple micro-amps *not including propeller*.
Thanks again for the input. I have plenty to think about now!