I woke up this morning and was not sure what to expect. There was so much that could go wrong.
Such a fantastic feeling hearing the rover had landed and seeing the first pictures coming in.
I watched the "landing" on both the Internet and CNN International, usually the streaming use to be seconds or minutes delayed, this time the pictures on TV was a second behind the streaming pictures on the Internet.
If only they'd been able to send two - one could then film the other sky-craning the rover down to the surface! (and two would mean the risk of total mission failure was reduced). But to pull this off is a major coup in the history of Mars landings !!
It's a great achievement and even greater when they find something new again about life on Mars. Since before the time of Percival Lowell and Giovanni Schiaparelli, Mars life has remained an enigmatic controversy. When Curiosity strolls along the dried up ocean bed, I'm sure it cannot resist picking up some sea fossils.
After the seven minutes of wondering whether it would land safely or not, now the anticipation will be to hear those greatly misquoted words "It's life Jim but not as we know it"
I'm yawning today because I stayed up 2:00am EST, but it was totally worth it.
NASA has done automated landings, using heat shields, and parachutes before, so the only part I was wondering about was that skycrane part. From the numbers that were reported about 30 minutes later, it looks like everything was SPOT ON.
Perfect science, engineering and programming from all involved.
A great success!
The discovery channel Canada aired that 500,000 lines of COD3 was run on landing, Awa-some!
What kind off memory would that take? EEPROM or PROM. I assume a good # of megabytes or gigabytes.
Hat's off to NASA!
So I've seen mainly two photos in the media - one of a wheel and this other one of the rover's shadow. I find it a bit amusing that we went all the way to Mars and this is the sum total of our photo journalism.
I know, more will come later - probably a lot more.
Well.. those photos are from the haz (as in hazard) cameras, the are just navigation tools. The 9 other cameras are not in use yet, except for that picture of the mountain. And that was taken with the lens cover on! It'll bea week before those dust covers will come off. And _then_ we'll see real pictures!<br>
<br>
-Tor<br>
More detailed photos are already coming in and the video of the descent is totally fantastic! You can watch everything on the NASA channel through internet. They have both recorded and live feeds.
With all the money that went in to this project you think they could have splurged for a Color camera!!!
The pictures are from the navigation cameras. No need for color. The real cameras wil come online after a week. One camera (color) has been tested, with its transparent dust cover still on (and dusty).
Nasa has a gallery of raw thumbnails which likely means that no image data has been discarded. Raw images can also appear to have no color if you have an application that cannot read raw image data.
Just watched that programme and excellent viewing it was, One part though regarding the decelleration parachute and the worry when it ripped made me wonder that although the entire project was risky from start to finish They were keeping all their eggs in one basket with using just one chute wouldn't it have been safer for multiple smaller ones or maybe just three smaller ones like the apollo missions had when coming back to earth? I know it's just academic now but that one chute was a big big risk
Three smaller chutes would be less efficient than one large one. That would mean more weight. Also, three times the chance of something going wrong.
If one of the three failed and the mission could still succeed then it means an even greater increase in weight since one of the chutes wasn't really needed.
Also, this was a supersonic chute, unlike the ones used in Apollo. It is likely that three chutes would not play well together at those speeds.
Comments
First picture!
Seeing the 256x256 "thumbnail" picture of Curiosity's shadow on martian soil was...well...very cool!
:thumb:
Yep, By 14 minutes I presume!!!
Such a fantastic feeling hearing the rover had landed and seeing the first pictures coming in.
I watched the "landing" on both the Internet and CNN International, usually the streaming use to be seconds or minutes delayed, this time the pictures on TV was a second behind the streaming pictures on the Internet.
Yes it was. Now we need wait to see what it discovers.
NASA has done automated landings, using heat shields, and parachutes before, so the only part I was wondering about was that skycrane part. From the numbers that were reported about 30 minutes later, it looks like everything was SPOT ON.
Jeff
A great success!
The discovery channel Canada aired that 500,000 lines of COD3 was run on landing, Awa-some!
What kind off memory would that take? EEPROM or PROM. I assume a good # of megabytes or gigabytes.
Hat's off to NASA!
best regards allie
I know, more will come later - probably a lot more.
<br>
-Tor<br>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&list=UUXRihcrTP6zOcVfd4WfBMqw&v=GY_7d55vJko&NR=1
-Tor
If one of the three failed and the mission could still succeed then it means an even greater increase in weight since one of the chutes wasn't really needed.
Also, this was a supersonic chute, unlike the ones used in Apollo. It is likely that three chutes would not play well together at those speeds.
http://www.npr.org/programs/wait-wait-dont-tell-me/