Shop OBEX P1 Docs P2 Docs Learn Events
Megamillions jackpot 1/2 Billion dollars !!! — Parallax Forums

Megamillions jackpot 1/2 Billion dollars !!!

BeanBean Posts: 8,129
edited 2012-04-02 13:49 in General Discussion
I'm not a big lottery player, but I had to buy a ticket for this.
Half a billion dollars...What would you do with it ?

www.megamillions.com

Bean
«1

Comments

  • mindrobotsmindrobots Posts: 6,506
    edited 2012-03-28 15:47
    Pay more taxes than I do now.
    Get offers from a lot more people that want to take my money than I do now.
    Buy more stuff than I have now.
    Buy a bigger house to hold the additional stuff I just bought.
    Take Chip out to dinner and ask "If money was no object.........."
    Sponsor UPETahiti and give away air fare and hotel with the free tickets.
  • BeanBean Posts: 8,129
    edited 2012-03-28 17:08
    mindrobots wrote: »
    Take Chip out to dinner and ask "If money was no object.........."

    That would be an interesting conversation.

    Bean
  • doggiedocdoggiedoc Posts: 2,245
    edited 2012-03-28 17:20
    Yep Bean - I noticed that today too. I don't usually buy lottery tickets but it's hard to say no to a chance (however minuscule) to 1/2 $Billion. I may have to buy one.

    So after taxes a lump sum payment would net you about $300,000,000.00 or so. I could fix a lot of doggies and kitties with that.

    P
  • GordonMcCombGordonMcComb Posts: 3,366
    edited 2012-03-28 17:43
    If they had a prize for getting NO numbers out of 8 tickets worth then I would have won something.

    -- Gordon
  • User NameUser Name Posts: 1,451
    edited 2012-03-28 17:51
    I'd buy myself Swiss citizenship. It's practically the only thing I really want that I don't already have.
  • __red____red__ Posts: 470
    edited 2012-03-28 18:00
    doggiedoc wrote: »
    it's hard to say no to a chance (however minuscule) to 1/2 $Billion.

    I'm with doggiedoc. I won't go to the gas station for less than $200 million :lol:
  • ElectricAyeElectricAye Posts: 4,561
    edited 2012-03-28 18:19
    Your chances of being killed by a terrorist are 1 in 20,000,000.
    You have about a 1 in 1,000,000 chance of getting hit by lightning in any given year.
    You have about a 1 in 10,000 chance of getting hit by lightning during your lifetime.
    You have about a 1.5% chance of dying in a car accident over the course of an average lifespan.

    When you go to buy your tickets, just be sure to buckle your seat belt.


    odds_062205.gif
  • LoopyBytelooseLoopyByteloose Posts: 12,537
    edited 2012-03-29 06:13
    I'd leave town on a world tour - definely visit Florence, Venice, San Mario, Monte Carlo, the south of France, and Barcelona; maybe do it all in a nice big yacht.

    With a half-billion I could have a butler to take care of my micro-controllers.
  • icepuckicepuck Posts: 466
    edited 2012-03-29 19:34
    I'd buy Radio Shack..
    -dan
  • bill190bill190 Posts: 769
    edited 2012-03-29 20:39
    icepuck wrote: »
    I'd buy Radio Shack..

    Price............ $3,954,666,300
    Winnings......... $300,000,000
    ======================
    Balance Due..$3,654,666,300

    Eastman Kodak is on sale for just $27,792,000
  • localrogerlocalroger Posts: 3,452
    edited 2012-03-30 05:22
    Here's a question: Would you buy a ticket with the numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6? Basically the Spaceballs password?

    Probably not, right? You'd want something a little more random.

    Except that the chances of the winning numbers being 1..6 is exactly the same as the chance of any other set of numbers emerging. Or as Knuth put it in Seminumerical Algorithms, if your "random" number generator can't turn out a string of twenty zeroes, it's obviously not random, since that is a perfectly valid result just as possible as any other specific string of twenty numbers.

    Now I need to buy an insurance policy and wait to get hit by lightning...
  • RiJoRiRiJoRi Posts: 157
    edited 2012-03-30 06:54
    I keep on offering lottery players I know the following: "Give me your money, and every now and again I'll give some back to you." Nobody has taken me up on it, yet they keep playing the lottery, hoping to win...

    The odds really suck. If there are 56 numbers to choose from, and you must pick 5, then (if I remember correctly) the odds are 1 in 56*55*54*53*52, or 1 in 458,377,920! I think I'll use localroger's method...

    --Rich
  • BeanBean Posts: 8,129
    edited 2012-03-30 07:21
    Rick,
    The odds are not that bad. You're formula is not right because you don't have to pick the numbers in the order they are drawn.
    In other words if you picked 1,2,3,4,5 and the numbers drawn were in the order 5,1,4,2,3 then you would still win.
    The odds in mega millions are just under 176 million to one. This time it does make some logical sense to play.

    Bean
  • Martin HodgeMartin Hodge Posts: 1,246
    edited 2012-03-30 07:33
    In order of importance...

    1) Impenetrable fortress
    2) Girlfriend robot
    3) $10,000,000 worth of comic books.
    4) $10,000,000 worth of coin-op.
    5) Arby's
  • ElectricAyeElectricAye Posts: 4,561
    edited 2012-03-30 07:38
    Bean wrote: »
    ...This time it does make some logical sense to play....

    I think it might be logical but only if you were somehow guaranteed that other people could not play your same numbers, in which case you would have to split the "jackpot" if those numbers win. So your expectation ratio might not be what you think it is. Notice that the odds I have posted above have fixed values for all prizes except for the "jackpot" - because they leave open the possibility you will have to split it.

    That's why localroger's suggestion of picking numbers like 1 2 3 4 5 etc. is statistically valid for hitting the jackpot, but would leave you splitting it a thousand ways. Same goes for some other "mystical" numbers that people play all the time, birthdays, horoscopes, fortune cookie numbers, etc.

    But, of course, there's always a possibility I'm totally wrong about this.
  • BeanBean Posts: 8,129
    edited 2012-03-30 07:52
    They say the best numbers to pick are those above 31. Many people play dates, so picking number above 31 lessens the chances that there will be more than one winner.
    It would be interesting to see if this thought holds true. I guess you could go back through all the winners and see if there were more multiple winners when lower numbers are chosen.

    Bean
  • prof_brainoprof_braino Posts: 4,313
    edited 2012-03-30 07:57
    You can't win if you don't play; but you WON'T win if you DO play.

    For a buck, I'll take a stab at a jackpot. The cost of playing each week is insignificant, that the payout allows me yet another way to daydream. (the ritual is to ride a motorcycle to the kiosk 5 minutes before game time and get a quick-pick, it guarantees exclusivity).

    I'd hire forum members to finish my projects for me, at least that way they MIGHT get done.
  • BeanBean Posts: 8,129
    edited 2012-03-30 08:11
    Yeah, to me it's worth a buck to day dream about what I would do if I won.
    $104 per year is the least of my worries.

    Bean
  • LoopyBytelooseLoopyByteloose Posts: 12,537
    edited 2012-03-30 08:56
    Sadly, www.megamillions.com seems to be completely blocked in Taiwan. So I won't be playing.

    There is a guy that has won six lotteries and wrote a book on how to win. He claims you should NEVER let the computer pick the numbers - use anything else. I suspect that buying from an outlet in a poor neighborhood has a better chance of winning if there are physcial outlets.
  • Mike2545Mike2545 Posts: 433
    edited 2012-03-30 09:13
    Now up to $640 Million
  • Oldbitcollector (Jeff)Oldbitcollector (Jeff) Posts: 8,091
    edited 2012-03-30 10:12
    Just bought the winning numbers...

    OBC
  • bill190bill190 Posts: 769
    edited 2012-03-30 10:36
    If you study a list of previous winning numbers, you can see what the winning numbers will NOT be.

    And you can see the typical "randomness" of most sets of winning numbers.

    You can do something like totaling up all the numbers. Here are just 5 with totals of those numbers...

    9, 19, 34, 44, 51 Mega Ball = 24 (Total = 181)
    6, 17, 19, 20, 21 Mega Ball = 20 (Total = 103)
    1, 4, 6, 11, 14 Mega Ball = 30 = (Total = 66)
    28, 29, 43, 51, 53 Mega Ball = 7 (Total = 211)
    2, 8, 30, 36, 48 Mega Ball = 31 (Total = 155)
    9, 10, 27, 36, 42 Mega Ball = 11 (Total = 135)

    So the totals of these past 5 sets of winning numbers range from 66 to 211.

    If you total up some numbers in a row like...

    1,2,3,4,5,6 Total = 21 Then 21 falls outside the above totals.

    You could total up numbers in a row which are higher in value, then they would fall into the above range. But you could devise other tests which would weed out unlikely winners.

    Say look at the groups for the first 5 numbers.
    1 to 7
    8 to 14
    15 to 21
    22 to 29
    etc.

    You may see that past winning numbers always are distributed in at least 4 of those groups and never in all 8 groups or whatever. (I don't know and I am not going to go to all that work!) So if your entry of numbers falls outside of that range, then you have an unlikely to win set of numbers.

    Anyway you can come up with "tests" and "rules" as to what past winning numbers typically are, then eliminate sets of numbers which do not fit that "signature".

    Actually "Arc Fault" circuit breakers used in new homes look for a "signature" on the electric lines of a short (spark), then if it fits the criteria, will shut off power.
  • GordonMcCombGordonMcComb Posts: 3,366
    edited 2012-03-30 10:50
    So I bought my ticket today, went hog wild with $3 worth. I tripled my chances!

    Based on my past experiences, I should probably tell you my numbers, as none of them will be in the draw. I tell ya, I could be rich if that's the way the lottery worked.

    -- Gordon
  • RavenkallenRavenkallen Posts: 1,057
    edited 2012-03-30 21:34
    Man, i don't even know what i would do with that kinda cash... I would definitely be more popular with the ladies no doubt ;)
  • mindrobotsmindrobots Posts: 6,506
    edited 2012-03-31 01:03
    Actually, your MONEY would be more popular!! You just become an inconvenient but tolerable access method.
  • ajwardajward Posts: 1,130
    edited 2012-03-31 03:32
    Wow, $300 million +/-. I suppose I'd have to buy a bigger house for all the "long lost relatives" that dropped by to "visit". :-|

    @
  • prof_brainoprof_braino Posts: 4,313
    edited 2012-03-31 07:27
    mindrobots wrote: »
    Actually, your MONEY would be more popular!! You just become an inconvenient but tolerable access method.

    With that much money I would strive to test the limits of tolerable and inconvenient. I guess I already do that now without the money.
  • Oldbitcollector (Jeff)Oldbitcollector (Jeff) Posts: 8,091
    edited 2012-03-31 07:32
    It wasn't me...

    Ok, time for you guys to buy more Quick modules... :p

    OBC
  • Ron CzapalaRon Czapala Posts: 2,418
    edited 2012-03-31 08:42
    I am glad to see that there were at least three winning tickets - that's an obscene amount of money for just one winner.

    Would have been nice to be one of three!!
  • skylightskylight Posts: 1,915
    edited 2012-03-31 09:52
    Just think if you won you'd be able to keep up with buying all of Erco's Internet finds

    Just seen on our news that the seller get's $100,000 also, that's nice for them, should do something like that over here
Sign In or Register to comment.