Shop OBEX P1 Docs P2 Docs Learn Events
Prop II — Parallax Forums

Prop II

dr hydradr hydra Posts: 212
edited 2011-10-09 05:00 in Propeller 1
I am going crazy...any nuggets of information/updates...
«1

Comments

  • Mike GreenMike Green Posts: 23,101
    edited 2011-10-06 14:28
    Take a deep breath, maybe get a massage. Patience is a virtue for sure. I'm sure that nuggets won't be enough for you. You want details and a delivery date, maybe even a couple of chips and you're not going to get those for a while ... an undefined while. Chip and his elves are doing good work ... and there's a lot of work involved ... design ... layout ... testing ... repeated refinement. They did a great job with the Prop-1 and they insist on doing a great job with the Prop-2. It'll be ready when it's ready.
  • Cluso99Cluso99 Posts: 18,069
    edited 2011-10-06 22:00
    Look what happened with the iPhone 4S... It was everything people hoped for and more, but it fell flat because Apple called it an iPhone 4S and not an iPhone 5.

    Shss... PropII is only a rumour!
    The ?????? chip (formerly code named Prop II) will be here when its here. Nothing we say can possibly make it go any faster, perhaps unless you have a few $Ms to throw into the pot. And then it may not meet what we want because it is rushed.
  • AleAle Posts: 2,363
    edited 2011-10-07 01:26
    They will sell bucketloads of iPhone 4Ss, plenty. I'd also like one, if were not for the montly fee!
  • Heater.Heater. Posts: 21,230
    edited 2011-10-07 02:25
    dr hydra,
    ..any nuggets of information/updates...

    Shooo...I think I can let you into a little secret. The Prop II is going to be square.
  • TorTor Posts: 2,010
    edited 2011-10-07 03:42
    Heater. wrote: »
    dr hydra,



    Shooo...I think I can let you into a little secret. The Prop II is going to be square.

    It's been leaked that it may also be black..

    -Tor
  • Cluso99Cluso99 Posts: 18,069
    edited 2011-10-07 03:49
    And pins too.
  • SapiehaSapieha Posts: 2,964
    edited 2011-10-07 06:36
    And will have printed NAME on it
  • Heater.Heater. Posts: 21,230
    edited 2011-10-07 06:41
    Yes, lot's of pins. But now I say too much.
  • mindrobotsmindrobots Posts: 6,506
    edited 2011-10-07 08:48
    Rumor Mongers!!!! You should all be ashamed!! :lol:
  • dr hydradr hydra Posts: 212
    edited 2011-10-07 09:04
    Thank you Mike for your response...patience is a virtue...

    I am surprised by some of the responses…I guess when you are in the “know” it is easy to forget what it is like on the other side of the fence.
  • Dave HeinDave Hein Posts: 6,347
    edited 2011-10-07 09:07
    It would be nice to get an update on the status of the Prop II. Parallax was very open about the process a few months ago, but there have been no updates for a while. I understand that we don't want to burden the design team by having them answer a lot of questions. Maybe someone in Parallax could spend just a few minutes to give us an update.
  • Heater.Heater. Posts: 21,230
    edited 2011-10-07 09:14
    Dr hydra,
    I suspect that the number of people who are "in the know" is limited to Chip Gracey and a very small number of others who are actually doing the work.
    For sure does not include me. I'm just winding you up a bit:)
    We are all waiting and biting our nails like yourself.
    But don't forget there is a lot of the Prop I world that is not explored yet.
  • Cluso99Cluso99 Posts: 18,069
    edited 2011-10-07 11:49
    Dr Hydra: I am not in the know either. Otherwise I would not be able to comment.
    I think heaters comments sums it up completely.

    I am fully occupied with Prop I - there is still so much we can do with it that has not yet been discovered. So I dont have any time to think about what I dont know about PropII.
  • Beau SchwabeBeau Schwabe Posts: 6,568
    edited 2011-10-07 12:35
    Dave Hein and ALL,

    "It would be nice to get an update on the status of the Prop II. Parallax was very open about the process a few months ago, but there have been no updates for a while" - and I'm afraid I can't say much more right now. We are still moving forward working with the synthesis guys and doing a little floor planning to facilitate better timing. The original spec was for the system clock to run at 160MHz .... at the last EXPO this figure was reduced to 120MHz because of unobtainable timing requirements. After talking to Chip a couple of days ago, I can now say that the the system clock speed will be greater than 160MHz... :-) ... how much greater is hard to say... worst case scenario simulations are indicating 180MHz <-- worst case
  • mindrobotsmindrobots Posts: 6,506
    edited 2011-10-07 12:45
    ZOOM..Zoom...zoom
  • PublisonPublison Posts: 12,366
    edited 2011-10-07 12:46
    Dave Hein and ALL,

    "It would be nice to get an update on the status of the Prop II. Parallax was very open about the process a few months ago, but there have been no updates for a while" - and I'm afraid I can't say much more right now. We are still moving forward working with the synthesis guys and doing a little floor planning to facilitate better timing. The original spec was for the system clock to run at 160MHz .... at the last EXPO this figure was reduced to 120MHz because of unobtainable timing requirements. After talking to Chip a couple of days ago, I can now say that the the system clock speed will be greater than 160MHz... :-) ... how much greater is hard to say... worst case scenario simulations are indicating 180MHz <-- worst case

    Beau,

    Thanks for the update! 180 sounds great!

    Jim
  • Roy ElthamRoy Eltham Posts: 3,000
    edited 2011-10-07 13:04
    Excellent News Beau!
    Any chance you'll be in the Rocklin area between Dec. 4th and 10th?
  • Phil Pilgrim (PhiPi)Phil Pilgrim (PhiPi) Posts: 23,514
    edited 2011-10-07 13:19
    After talking to Chip a couple of days ago, I can now say that the the system clock speed will be greater than 160MHz....
    Can you share what that implies about the pin output architecture?

    -Phil
  • User NameUser Name Posts: 1,451
    edited 2011-10-07 13:29
    Delightful!

    Thanks Beau.
  • Dave HeinDave Hein Posts: 6,347
    edited 2011-10-07 13:44
    Beau, thanks for the information. 180 MHz is great!
    Mike Green wrote: »
    I'm sure that nuggets won't be enough for you. You want details and a delivery date, maybe even a couple of chips...
    Mike, you are correct, as usual. Now, I want more details. :)
  • jazzedjazzed Posts: 11,803
    edited 2011-10-07 13:46
    fft_bench in 5.2ms :)
  • Peter KG6LSEPeter KG6LSE Posts: 1,383
    edited 2011-10-07 14:45
    Just don't leave a proto chip at a bar .... Who knows .. Chip and Ken in SWAT gear may Raid your lab bench if you take it home...

    Peter
  • Cluso99Cluso99 Posts: 18,069
    edited 2011-10-07 16:13
    WOW! After being disillusioned at the possibity of 120MHz, down from 160, the icing comes to the cake ;)

    Now, dare I ask.... can you work the same miracles with hub ram??? (PS I know its all about space, but you never know if you dont ask)
  • jmgjmg Posts: 15,185
    edited 2011-10-08 15:59
    ... worst case scenario simulations are indicating 180MHz <-- worst case

    If only all silicon met worst case simulations ;)
    Is this 180MHz simulation, for the opcodes, or does it include the Counters/Shifters/Serializers ?

    Does this mean PWM generation to 5.5ns (or better?) edge definition, and timing Capture/measure to 5.5ns (or better?) ?

    This is only 11% off 200MHz, so you might be able to do what other vendors do, and offer a 200MHz spec, with restricted
    temperature and voltage corner cases ?

    I've often grumbled about 32 bit micros with 16 bit timers, (what WERE they thinking?!) but I see I am not alone, and notice the first 32 bit micro's now with 64(!) bit timers. Wow.
    http://focus.ti.com/en/graphics/mcu/stellaris-arm-cortex-m4-LM4F110.jpg

    There must be others out there, with even more demanding time-domain problems, and the nice thing about 64 bits, is you (almost) never need worry about wrap, and can also capture/generate events some time apart, to the full timebase precision.
    32 bits at 180Mhz wraps in ~24 seconds, which is not that long.
  • Cluso99Cluso99 Posts: 18,069
    edited 2011-10-08 17:05
    IIRC the counters can be chained to give 64bits.

    You can bet we will overclock the PropII ;) However, because of its complexity it will be harder for us mortals to ensure it can be done safely without unknown data paths on the edge.
  • Heater.Heater. Posts: 21,230
    edited 2011-10-09 00:08
    I need to start saving up for a trip to Parallax for the Prop II launch shin dig. Never been to the states before, this would be as good an excuse as any to get there.
  • Cluso99Cluso99 Posts: 18,069
    edited 2011-10-09 00:38
    I'll be in that too if posible heater. Best get OBC onboard so we can have an expo following the launch too ;)
  • Heater.Heater. Posts: 21,230
    edited 2011-10-09 04:06
    Cluso,
    Excellent. Look forward to meeting you there.
    For a long time now I have been daydreaming about a monster Prop II launch, expo, conference, party event.
  • RaymanRayman Posts: 14,865
    edited 2011-10-09 04:52
    I wonder if they're keeping the clock freq a multiple of 12 MHz to make USB interface easier...
  • Cluso99Cluso99 Posts: 18,069
    edited 2011-10-09 05:00
    Ray: we would really need 192MHz operation for that (16*12=192) otherwise it would just be a variable number in the pll (15*12=180, 14*12=168, etc). Now, if they spec it at 180MHz I bet we can overclock to 192MHz ;)
Sign In or Register to comment.