HDMI output board
Rayman
Posts: 14,876
Was taking a look at making an HDMI output board...
Looks like a non-starter though due to licensing for "HDMI".
I'm not completely sure if they'd go after me or not, but it wouldn't surprise me...
So, I think I'll work on a board with a HDMI chip, but a DVI connector.
That way, you can connect to a DVI monitor directly.
Or, you can buy a little DVI to HDMI adapter and connect to big screen TV.
Nice thing about HDMI is you get audio too.
I've read that some new video cards are doing the same thing...
They have a DVI connector, but with the HDMI adapter, you can get sound out too.
Looks like a non-starter though due to licensing for "HDMI".
I'm not completely sure if they'd go after me or not, but it wouldn't surprise me...
So, I think I'll work on a board with a HDMI chip, but a DVI connector.
That way, you can connect to a DVI monitor directly.
Or, you can buy a little DVI to HDMI adapter and connect to big screen TV.
Nice thing about HDMI is you get audio too.
I've read that some new video cards are doing the same thing...
They have a DVI connector, but with the HDMI adapter, you can get sound out too.
Comments
OTOH, HDTVs often have VGA inputs.
-Phil
Bill
I think it applies to anything sold to a consumer that has an HDMI connector on it...
I suppose, I could sell the board without a connector soldered on, but I'm leaning toward the DVI connector option...
VGA is OK, but I've noticed some wavyness at high resolutions on big monitors. Also, I'm not sure the color rendering is 100%
I'm pretty sure HDMI/DVI output will be flawless.
http://www.xilinx.com/support/documentation/application_notes/xapp460.pdf
and here is one from Altera:
http://www.altera.com/literature/an/an627.pdf
http://forums.parallax.com/showthread.php?117342
But, that chip doesn't encode sound. I'd like to experiment with adding sound too...
BTW: One other nice thing about DVI/HDMI is that you can use it to power your Prop...
It is spec'd to provide 55 mA of 5 VDC, but almost all implementations give you much more...
Edit: As Rayman says below, HDPC is probably _another_ fee.. but as far as I know the connector by itself isn't the important thing here, it's whether you use the connector for HDMI or not.
-Tor
I think the Beagleboard is made by TI. They probably don't worry about dropping $5k a year for HDMI licensing...
I don't think they'd have to pay if they used a DVI connector. But, I bet they do pay for use of the HDMI connector...
-Phil
Wikipedia incorrectly states that it is produced by TI, but the discussion page corrects this (unfortunately the article hasn't been updated. I have no idea why). It's true that the original development of the board was sponsored by TI, but they don't produce the board. The original production was funded by Digi-Key. The design is also completely open, and there are now a few other makers - I believe one is made in Sweden, but the elinux.org site is down at the moment so I can't get to the details. I highly doubt that these other makers pay $5k a year for the privilege..! (btw hdmi.org says it's $10k now).
In short, it says nowhere that the plug itself is the key to have to become an HDMI adopter, from what I can tell you only have to do that if you claim that you are actually HDMI compliant. And the Beagleboard isn't - it's using DVI, not HDMI.
-Tor
I think they've removed almost all references to HDMI in their documentation. I remember looking at that board when it first appeared on Digikey.com,
and seem to remember a lot about the HDMI output....
Anyway, I think they've found a way around the issue... They don't call it HDMI anywhere, they call it DVI-D.
This is actually true because the TFP410 chip doesn't do "real" hdmi even though it is compatible.
Maybe I could use a similar strategy because the chip I'm looking at does offer a "DVI" mode in addition to "HDMI" mode.
Perhaps if I didn't use the word "HDMI" anywhere in the description (like Beagleboard) I could get away with it....