Noise questions
BTX
Posts: 674
Hi everybody !
I'm designing with propeller chip since 2006 year, for industrials applications. But there is an issue that I never can get full 100% work well.
It is the reset of the pchip randomly, usually when I'm starting an standard contactor near him.
My boards always have optocoupled inputs and outputs, I'm using switching power supplies, always exclusive for my pchip boards, I'm wiring GND's correctly, I'm using PQFP chips, correctly decoupled with .1uf and a 1uf capacitors, my PCB's use all Vcc pins wired together, and all GND pins wired too, wired ,anyway I can avoid some inesperated resets in some ocations.
Could it be, due a isue in the reset pin of my boards? should I put it at Vcc using a resistor to avoid this ? or, what could I do to solve this?
Any ideas ?.
Cheers.
Alberto.
I'm designing with propeller chip since 2006 year, for industrials applications. But there is an issue that I never can get full 100% work well.
It is the reset of the pchip randomly, usually when I'm starting an standard contactor near him.
My boards always have optocoupled inputs and outputs, I'm using switching power supplies, always exclusive for my pchip boards, I'm wiring GND's correctly, I'm using PQFP chips, correctly decoupled with .1uf and a 1uf capacitors, my PCB's use all Vcc pins wired together, and all GND pins wired too, wired ,anyway I can avoid some inesperated resets in some ocations.
Could it be, due a isue in the reset pin of my boards? should I put it at Vcc using a resistor to avoid this ? or, what could I do to solve this?
Any ideas ?.
Cheers.
Alberto.
Comments
-Phil
Should not be this a common practique for all boards so ? Did I missed some document where this is write ?
-Phil
I agree with what Phil says, and you should try that first.
Depending on the layout you may also be getting direct radiation from the arc of the contactor. We use a small RC snubber for supressing the contactor coil, and sometimes also the contactor poles.
If you do bypass the contactor poles, please be aware of the safety implications. These bleed a few mA of current into the "switched off" load (motor/light). Usually the current is less mA than a RCD safety switch is set to trip at (30mA), but it depends on the capacitor value, frequency (50/60Hz) etc. Please be careful and PM me if anything is not clear.
Thank you for posting too !, it's not an EMI, all is inside a Faraday system, contactors have their parts too, it's comming by the power supply.
I will try the solutions in next months, when I'll have an automation to install.
I usually take input at 3.6V, and size the zeners to protect the caps. Key to performance is cap choice - I like to use the Kemet T496 fail-safe fused tantalums. Having a fuse inline with a tantalum is always nice but the point is that the additional ESR from the fuses is somewhat helpful from a damping perspective. The inductor is a Coilcraft, part number as shown. I have used this with 10uH inductors as well, not much difference in performance. Following all of this is a 3.3V output LDO.
BTW, having separate faraday cages for differing zones of protection has helped me with very high current designs. Depending on your volume you may be able to justify some customized surface mount shields -- see http://www.gore.com/en_xx/products/electronic/emi/snapshot/index.html.
V/R
Mike
Thank you so much !!, it is an interesting solution to add to the boards. I'll try it too.
This crude code may cause issues...
This crude code will not cause issues...