Shop OBEX P1 Docs P2 Docs Learn Events
Visitor brought fascinating things to Parallax today (quadcopters!) — Parallax Forums

Visitor brought fascinating things to Parallax today (quadcopters!)

Ken GraceyKen Gracey Posts: 7,401
edited 2011-05-11 07:30 in General Discussion
Today was a really exciting day at Parallax because we had a visitor that demonstrated their Propeller-based control system on three different quadcopters. Al Ducharme of http://www.hoverflytech.com/ showed us how their HoverflySPORT and HoverflyPRO can be used on a variety of quadcopter designs ranging from small single-piece designs to larger, heavy craft. After Al saw the laser cutter, router and milling machines it was only a matter of hours before our team produced our own quadcopter frame from their drawings. Now, how many Spektrum DX8 transmitters will we need to buy?

Hoverfly's plug-and-play control system is configured by a simple PC program where the user identifies connections, number of motors, gain, etc. Their primary business seems to be on the higher end - large 10-30 lb copters that carry video cameras and other surveillance equipment. Of course the same control board can fly a little 12" system just as nicely. Provided you can make a quadcopter with some vibration protection their system will fly it well.

I'm sharing a video [video]http://www.youtube.com/embed/6INyDZykWZ8[/video] and a couple of photos below. You'll see from the video how people get drawn out of the office by the quadcopter demo.

Thank you Al for making our day truly interesting!

Ken Gracey
Parallax Inc.

attachment.php?attachmentid=80326&d=1303186087

attachment.php?attachmentid=80327&d=1303186087

attachment.php?attachmentid=80328&d=1303186087
800 x 600 - 124K
800 x 600 - 127K
800 x 633 - 140K
QC2.jpg 124.3K
QC1.jpg 127.3K
QC3.jpg 140.2K

Comments

  • Jessica UelmenJessica Uelmen Posts: 490
    edited 2011-04-18 21:29
    I agree! I just may have to use one of these for my thesis, they are waaaay too much fun! :D
  • MicrocontrolledMicrocontrolled Posts: 2,461
    edited 2011-04-19 07:05
    Cool!! I love the way it flies! Maybe Parallax should start selling these..... :-D
  • JimInCAJimInCA Posts: 80
    edited 2011-04-19 08:53
    Ken, very nice. I hope you invited them back for UPEW.
    Jim...
  • Ken GraceyKen Gracey Posts: 7,401
    edited 2011-04-19 09:29
    JimInCA wrote: »
    Ken, very nice. I hope you invited them back for UPEW.
    Jim...

    I tried, Jim. Hopefully you will be here too since you are "InCA".

    @Microcontrolled - once you start rolling trough college we should arrange an internship at Parallax. I can imagine that you'd be right at home with the machines and electronics in the office.

    Ken Gracey
  • ratronicratronic Posts: 1,451
    edited 2011-04-19 09:35
    That was cool! I wonder how much program tuning needs to be done between the different frames that were tried.
  • Ken GraceyKen Gracey Posts: 7,401
    edited 2011-04-19 09:44
    @ratronic - each is configured in their Hoverfly GUI, which downloads some parameters to the Propeller. I noticed that he flew three different quadcopters with the same radio - and NO programming changes were made on the radio side. I haven't actually used the Hoverfly GUI yet but Kevin Cook (Tech Support) tells me it's the easiest part of the setup. Apparently there are two ways to set up a quadcopter, as a + (plus) or x (X) configuration.

    Hoverfly's business model is oriented towards people who need to get their copters flying, not those who wish to learn how to program Propellers to interface with gyros, GPS, accelerometers and electronic speed controls.

    Ken Gracey
    Parallax Inc.
  • JimInCAJimInCA Posts: 80
    edited 2011-04-19 10:31
    Ken Gracey wrote: »
    I tried, Jim. Hopefully you will be here too since you are "InCA".


    Ken Gracey

    Ken,
    I already have my ticket, hence my question about UPEW. But it may be an expencive weekend. When I told my wife that I was planning on going, she said "Great! You can drop me off at Thunder Valley"... I guess that we each have our hobbies...
    Jim...
  • HollyMinkowskiHollyMinkowski Posts: 1,398
    edited 2011-04-19 10:46
    That quad copter would be fun with a camera on it.

    I wonder what the range is on a charge?
  • Ken GraceyKen Gracey Posts: 7,401
    edited 2011-04-19 11:01
    JimInCA wrote: »
    Ken,
    I already have my ticket, hence my question about UPEW. But it may be an expencive weekend. When I told my wife that I was planning on going, she said "Great! You can drop me off at Thunder Valley"... I guess that we each have our hobbies...
    Jim...

    Jim, we'll have a quadcopter flying around at UPEW.

    You can also drop off your wife at the Galleria shopping mall. It will be less expensive than than Thunder Valley.

    Ken Gracey
  • TtailspinTtailspin Posts: 1,326
    edited 2011-04-19 13:39
    That thing looks Dangerous!
    Cool.. :smile:
  • doggiedocdoggiedoc Posts: 2,245
    edited 2011-04-19 14:09
    That is awesome! I hope to see them at UPEW!!

    I want to add one of those to my "collection."

    Paul
  • Ken GraceyKen Gracey Posts: 7,401
    edited 2011-04-19 15:53
    doggiedoc wrote: »
    That is awesome! I hope to see them at UPEW!!

    I want to add one of those to my "collection."

    Paul

    Paul, this will be a first time adventure to a UPE for you. We will be very fortunate to have you as a guest at Parallax. Quick tip - make your reservation at the Rocklin StayBridge Suites on Lone Tree. This hotel is literally 2-3x nicer than the nearest competitors. With it's tidy and clean rooms, complete DIY breakfast with fruit, proximity to Parallax and a happy-hour gathering space you'll be very comfortable.

    Ken Gracey
  • JasonDorieJasonDorie Posts: 1,930
    edited 2011-04-19 16:10
    @Holly - Mine will run 12 minutes on a charge, and has a pretty decent top speed (probably in the 30 to 40 mph range). A more efficient prop / motor combo and some weight reduction in the body could double that. Hovering things do better with larger diameter, but slower spinning props, but I wanted mine to move quickly. There are quads that have 30 minute flight times.
  • MicrocontrolledMicrocontrolled Posts: 2,461
    edited 2011-04-19 18:03
    Ken Gracey wrote: »

    @Microcontrolled - once you start rolling trough college we should arrange an internship at Parallax. I can imagine that you'd be right at home with the machines and electronics in the office.

    Ken Gracey

    For the first time in my life I seriously cannot think of anything I'd rather do. Imagine: Machines, Electronics, Propellers, Sensors, Parallax......... does it really get much better?!? :-D That would be so awesome!
  • markaericmarkaeric Posts: 282
    edited 2011-04-20 02:34
    That looks like quite a heavy beast! It's amazing what lithium batteries and brushless motors have done for the R/C market!
  • edited 2011-04-20 05:37
    JasonDorie wrote: »
    There are quads that have 30 minute flight times.

    I suppose with a combustible fuel engine, you might be able to get longer flight times and heavier lifting but the problem would be fuel leakage that some of the engines have and electromagnetic interference that the sparkplugs give off.
  • icepuckicepuck Posts: 466
    edited 2011-04-20 08:22
    something like the one in the video would be too small, you would have to use a small glow plug r/c engine. The only emi that is generated would by the generator itself.

    A few years ago I tried using a cox 0.020 and a mabuchi dc motor I had lying around.
    the first problem was trying to machine an adapter to drive the motor.
    the second was the short life span of the bearings because of the high speed that the little engine ran at.

    I'm not saying an apu like what I tried to build is impossible,just that is going to be some work involved in order for it to work well.

    The pic is my second attempt using an O.S. MAX 0.15CV with a flywheel/coupler meant for use in an R/C boat.
    -dan
    1024 x 682 - 124K
  • HollyMinkowskiHollyMinkowski Posts: 1,398
    edited 2011-04-21 03:39
    Something like this might be useful for communications.

    They have lots of rf relay equipment aboard remotely piloted
    vehicles...even complete cell systems that are in a very small
    and lightweight package. You could add something like that or
    a wideband rf translator to a quad copter.

    I suppose if you had really thin, strong wire you could tether
    the copter to the ground and feed power to it so it could stay
    up a long time. Instant radio tower :-)

    You could make up a small package containing the quad copter
    and the tethering wire, rf package and a roll out solar array w/batt pak for
    power....it would be very cool. Could probably be done for less than
    2k$ The thing could stay up 24/7

    Of course a fisheye downward looking high resolution camera would
    add a lot to something like this... They have nice software that gives
    you a perfectly normal image from a distorted fisheye type video feed.
  • edited 2011-04-21 05:14
    Would it be possible to develop some kind of lifting system for the Stingray? A robot delivery system for accidents like the one in Japan could help in the event of a disaster. There could be a real need for this in the future but it needs to be worked on for it to be useful.
  • Ken GraceyKen Gracey Posts: 7,401
    edited 2011-04-21 05:17
    @Holly. The kinds of things you're talking about are exactly what these guys are into. Working with them really speeds you to the right solutions quickly. It seems that the main business for these kinds of devices are in really custom applications like you describe. But unlike some of the out-of-the-box ideas you've got above, many of the key uses tend to be government-driven. Equally important is the entertainment business, too.

    When you get to deal with people who eat, breathe and live in such a specialized interest like this I'm always interested in how they've made all the mistakes, chosen or designed just the right parts after lots of experimentation (or R&D), and that they're very open to sharing. For example, ask Al "what's the best camera to mount on one of these?" and they'll quickly move you down the right path "for recording, transmitting, or telepresence flight, for personal or entertainment use?". I answer "just for recording, personal use" and in two seconds I learned that the plain and simple winner is http://gopro.com/products/?gclid=CKD5uYHLragCFUgbQgodohdQHQ. Unless I knew that I'd be putting a Flip on one of these.

    I bet these guys have a huge pile of motors, ESCs, propellers, radios, aluminum, carbon fiber, and anything else they might need in their shop. This is not an inexpensive interest, BTW. Yesterday I had the opportunity to sit down with our tech support and review their needs to build a couple of these quadcopters in time for UPEW.

    Ken Gracey
  • Ken GraceyKen Gracey Posts: 7,401
    edited 2011-04-21 05:19
    Chuckz wrote: »
    Would it be possible to develop some kind of lifting system for the Stingray? A robot delivery system for accidents like the one in Japan could help in the event of a disaster. There could be a real need for this in the future but it needs to be worked on for it to be useful.

    Hey Chuck, that's another good application. A parallel application is in law enforcement. They'll happily fly a $20-30K quadcopter into a situation well-before placing an officer in danger.

    Ken Gracey
  • edited 2011-04-21 05:34
    Ken Gracey wrote: »
    Hey Chuck, that's another good application. A parallel application is in law enforcement. They'll happily fly a $20-30K quadcopter into a situation well-before placing an officer in danger.

    Ken Gracey

    And that Oscilloscope that Holly posted could be worn as a watch and delivering tactical information to officers on the ground with one of your Xbee devices:

    http://forums.parallax.com/showthread.php?131135-Miniature-scope-whatsit...looks-like-fun
  • doggiedocdoggiedoc Posts: 2,245
    edited 2011-04-26 08:08
    Ken Gracey wrote: »
    Paul, this will be a first time adventure to a UPE for you. We will be very fortunate to have you as a guest at Parallax. Quick tip - make your reservation at the Rocklin StayBridge Suites on Lone Tree. This hotel is literally 2-3x nicer than the nearest competitors. With it's tidy and clean rooms, complete DIY breakfast with fruit, proximity to Parallax and a happy-hour gathering space you'll be very comfortable.

    Ken Gracey

    Staybridge booked, car reserved, flight payed for. Looking forward to being there!
  • WBA ConsultingWBA Consulting Posts: 2,935
    edited 2011-05-10 22:10
    I have always had a desire to get back into remote control hobbies, but nothing sparked my interest enough to actually buy something. Quadcopters have really got me interested, mainly because it is a helicopter style aircraft but with much better stability (of course when coded correctly). One of my Engineers has a small IR controlled helicopter with the two rotors than spin in opposite directions and flies it occasionally in our office. It's a trip to watch something so tiny fly like a real helicopter. One of my process techs has a gas powered helicopter and has flown it a few times in the grassy area by our parking lot. He is pretty amazing at flying the thing; somersaults and sharp banks, etc. My jaw dropped the first time I saw him fly it and he was upset because something on it was out of adjustment so he couldn't fly very well. Wow.

    Anyhow, propeller based quadcopters may just be the thing to get me back into RC aircraft (and autonomous). This thread definitely has my interest and then the news article on Sparkfun about the CrazyFlie is pretty awesome a well. Can't wait to see more at UPEW.
  • th3jesterth3jester Posts: 81
    edited 2011-05-11 07:30
    The UAV I built for my senior design is a quad-copter. You control it through any computer/laptop/smartphone with wireless internet. You get live streaming video, real-time data, and even are able to control the UAV through a Game Controller or the web page. It also has obstacle avoidance, autonomous routines and a Geiger counter! We took 1st place out of the entire College of Engineering and Engineering Technology (we are on the technology side). Our application was for a payload carrying UAV capable of detecting radioactive material and also providing video surveillance.

    Propeller Board
    Wii Nunchuck & MotionPlus
    Digital Compass
    6 Sharp IR Sensors
    2 MCP3204 IC's
    Spinneret
    Lorex IP Camera
    Planex Wireless Router
    Russian Cold War Geiger Muller tube
    and of course, 4 motors, 4 ESC's, and 4 batteries

    Everything works and functions correctly. I am still in the process of tuning and filtering to get more stability out of it. If I get it tuned in by June 25th then I will bring it (I still may bring it even if it's not stable enough to fly alone).

    The main thing I would change is the frame, as our frame design isn't very efficient. We estimated around 10 minutes of flight time.
Sign In or Register to comment.