Questions Before Buying
runswithscissors
Posts: 3
I am looking to use the propscope for automotive purposes 0 +15V and no more than 40KHz signal. My question is if I set the probes to 10x will it measure this without frying the scope.
Comments
With the probes set to 10x you should have +/- 100Vpp.
I need to find an alternate solution to my problem. This low end scope looks pretty nice:
http://www.rigolna.com/products/digital-oscilloscopes/ds1000e/ds1052e/
Pat
---
I use my propscope in 10x mode for diagnostics of waveforms for my x0xb0x. The peaks are around 15v.
It has been absolutely necessary for the things I am trying to do to this x0xb0x.
The price of the prop scope was well worth the amount of work it has done for me.
(and if I kill it, i can repair it myself, with open schematics, code, etc, keep this in mind when purchasing another brand)
I just wish the SW was as open and the HW.
Hanno
Yes, I want a very simple interface.
I would love to connect to the PropScope from various mobile devices,
like my EeePc and my Android phone. The later would be very cool.
I'd like to help replace/extend the USB interface with a BlueTooth device,
but that might take a rev of the PS HW.
A wireless PropScope would be hot, esp. if it was mobile.
Pat
---
Slap a LIPO battery on the back of it and you have a wireless, FULLY isolated oscilloscope!!!!!!
(no usb ground loop)
LIPO:http://www.adafruit.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=44&products_id=328
Hanno
> Please list what features you want in a simple firmeware ...
[ I think we should start a new thread for this topic -- PEK]
If I could make a tiny bit of progress with my current PropScope on Linux
(like getting it to talk to me) I would be happy to give you that list.
I am willing to update the spec.
Anyway, I hope I do not sound too negative, you guys have made
a very nice device.
Pat
---
P.S. the reason I like BT is that I was one of Motorola's reps
to the BT consortium years ago.
Cool, yeah we would need a good portable power pack. I really want to cut the USB teather.
Rather than do that, could you please spend some time actually completing the protocol documentation that was promised prior to the release of the product?
Hell, I have some code that samples both channels at 25Mhz and takes 6000 samples, but it triggers a bug in the hardware... yours obviously works, but the "documentation" is an insult.
What is the hardware bug you are seeing?
Thank you,
David Carrier
Parallax Inc.