Why more cryogenics can't always buy happiness
ElectricAye
Posts: 4,561
When dealing with very sensitive amplifying electronics, one must often worry about thermal effects creating noise on the system. One obvious way to reduce that noise is to cool off one's instruments as much as possible, and when one is poor like me and struggling to count photons with old cheap equipment, it's easy to lose oneself in flights of fantasy that involve prohibitively expensive cryogenic equipment, massive dewars and liquid helium bathing one's aging photomultiplier tubes until their noise counts go to zero...
But now this dude goes and pops my bubble:
www.physorg.com/pdf187421719.pdf
But now this dude goes and pops my bubble:
www.physorg.com/pdf187421719.pdf
Comments
Very interesting stuff, will be cool, no pun intended, to eventually find out the reason for the effect.
I wonder if anyone has tried a cube of electrically isolated sensors in close proximity over a long period of time to see if there are any correllations between the firing, just to isolate any external events. Maybe also trying differing alignments, isolation of variables using different materials etc. The problem sounds like serious fun to investigate. Who knows, maybe it's impurities in the cathode cascading something.... Fascinating to think about.
Thanks for sharing.