Why not FT232BM instead of FT232RL with Propeller?
jazzed
Posts: 11,803
People use FT232RL with Propeller which is an SSOP package.
The FT232BM appears to be identical except that it's a LQFP.
Why does no one use the FT232BM ?
Is there some functional reason to use the FT232RL instead of the FT232BM?
The FT232BM appears to be identical except that it's a LQFP.
Why does no one use the FT232BM ?
Is there some functional reason to use the FT232RL instead of the FT232BM?
Comments
The "BM" package is leaded while the "BL" and "RL" packages are lead-free.
-Phil