Shop OBEX P1 Docs P2 Docs Learn Events
MS releases free tools for robots (inc. Parallax). - Page 2 — Parallax Forums

MS releases free tools for robots (inc. Parallax).

2»

Comments

  • wjsteelewjsteele Posts: 697
    edited 2010-05-21 19:49
    There are three sites I recommend.

    One, Microsoft's Robotics page at www.microsoft.com/robotics
    Two, Microsoft's MSDN Page on Robot Development at msdn.microsoft.com/library/cc998486
    Lastly, some site I found that has a bunch of videos at the bottom at idealprogrammer.com/videos/microsoft-robotics-development-studio-15-free-video-tutorials/ (Scroll all the way to the bottom for the list.)

    I'd love to help someone out if they're interested in developing services for the propeller and possibly submitting them to the Obex.

    Bill
  • SRLMSRLM Posts: 5,045
    edited 2010-05-21 21:32
    Some of the replies in this thread are disturbing. You're judging "microsoft" the whole as "microsoft the OS", maybe even "microsoft Vista".

    Did anybody who complained about the robotics studio actually try it? Somehow, I doubt it...

    It may or may not have all the problems that seem to be expected, but it's unfair to automatically judge it based where it came from. That tactic, when applied to people, is called racist.

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    Powered by enthusiasm
  • RossHRossH Posts: 5,550
    edited 2010-05-21 23:48
    @SLRM

    I guess my oriignal remarks seemed flippant, and I will be more careful in future (apologies to wjsteele in particular). As heater pointed out, RDS is not actually a product that can be used to build an autonomous robot - it is a product intended to simulate or control robots using Windows.

    So our fears about world domination from Redmond are probably completely unfounded .... Hey, hang on a minute ... why is my mouse moving by itself? ... Help! It's got it's cord wrapped around my neck ... AARRGGHH!!!

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    Catalina - a FREE C compiler for the Propeller - see Catalina
  • ElectricAyeElectricAye Posts: 4,561
    edited 2010-05-22 03:04
    TonyWaite said...
    I see the announcement yesterday of the first self-replicating synthetic bacterium:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/science_and_environment/10132762.stm
    ....

    FWIW...

    This is really not that big of a deal. It's just an extension of genetic engineering that's already been going on. What makes this claim somewhat bogus is that there are tons of activities that take place between the genetic code and the final function(s). The processes that take place in the cell after the DNA is "read" are where most of the complexity lies and these guys didn't make any of that, they just hijacked it by sticking their codes in an already existing cell. In fact, biologists are still relatively clueless about the enormously complex activities that take place after the DNA code is "read". The codes are read, edited, sometimes repeated, sometimes spliced, altered in amazing ways often in response to environmental stresses, signals, quorum sensing, etc. Between the DNA code and the final functions, there's a whole lot of biochemical voodoo goes on, the dolls of which nobody yet has a good handle on.


    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proteomics
Sign In or Register to comment.