prop languages and compilers and even operating systems
whiteoxe
Posts: 794
I hope you have patience [noparse]:)[/noparse]
I read lots and find understandingon some complex thiggs hard to follw. does the prop have an OS ? like liux or widows. Is that a requirement of being able to write a programming language for it. Soo if thats correct can lots of programming languages be written for the prop, like Windows has heaps of programming languages.
Can prop enthusiasts keep writing different languages that will run on the prop ?
Can spin be bypassed completely for a language that appeals to some. , or is spin manadory to program the prop.
I just dont get it. Maybe spin is embedded into the prop ?
Thanks for reading.
I read lots and find understandingon some complex thiggs hard to follw. does the prop have an OS ? like liux or widows. Is that a requirement of being able to write a programming language for it. Soo if thats correct can lots of programming languages be written for the prop, like Windows has heaps of programming languages.
Can prop enthusiasts keep writing different languages that will run on the prop ?
Can spin be bypassed completely for a language that appeals to some. , or is spin manadory to program the prop.
I just dont get it. Maybe spin is embedded into the prop ?
Thanks for reading.
Comments
2) Yes, people can write other compilers, assemblers, and interpreters for the Prop. There are significant memory limitations (32K) that limit what might be doable, but all sorts of programs were written for CP/M with only 64K. Bill Henning's virtual memory library will help this.
3) Spin is not mandatory outside of a short preamble that has to be present to get a program running. That's how the existing C compilers work. On the other hand, the Spin interpreter is permanently part of the Prop's ROM and is very efficient, both in terms of memory usage and, given that it's an interpreter, in terms of execution speed.
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Leon Heller
Amateur radio callsign: G1HSM