Shop OBEX P1 Docs P2 Docs Learn Events
alternate ways of moving props — Parallax Forums

alternate ways of moving props

HumanoidoHumanoido Posts: 5,770
edited 2010-03-02 02:48 in Propeller 1
Here's a thought experiment.
Oddly enough, I only want to move the chips.

It was one thing moving two stamps - just use two servos.
But now I have a kind of robot where I want to move 170 props,
and 170 servos are out of the question.

humanoido

Post Edited (humanoido) : 3/1/2010 2:49:20 PM GMT

Comments

  • BradCBradC Posts: 2,601
    edited 2010-03-01 14:47
    humanoido said...
    170 servos are out of the question.

    A "propchime" and a big fan?

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    You only ever need two tools in life. If it moves and it shouldn't use Duct Tape. If it does not move and it should use WD40.
  • tonyp12tonyp12 Posts: 1,951
    edited 2010-03-01 14:55
    >robot where I want to move 170 props

    What kind if movment?

    170 props is $1200, ouch.
  • MagIO2MagIO2 Posts: 2,243
    edited 2010-03-01 15:14
    What about the cooler-bot?

    http://forums.parallax.com/forums/default.aspx?f=21&m=386212

    There's a lot of space left in the cooler.

    If your boards size is only a quater of the board used there, you can put maybe 10 x 10 x 3 of your propeller boards in the cooler .... maybe additional layers above the batteries.

    Post Edited (MagIO2) : 3/1/2010 3:46:15 PM GMT
  • Beau SchwabeBeau Schwabe Posts: 6,568
    edited 2010-03-01 15:19
    I know you said that this was a robot, but is it more of a kinetic art project? How much proximity from one prop to the next? You could have each prop drive an H-Bridge in turn driving a magnetic coil for an interesting 'swarm' interaction effect. ... just a thought, more details of your project would help.

    Another possibility.... Mirrors placed on each Prop (or coil) for a kinetic mosaic display? ... instead of coil to coil interaction, just coil to permanent magnet interaction.

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    Beau Schwabe

    IC Layout Engineer
    Parallax, Inc.

    Post Edited (Beau Schwabe (Parallax)) : 3/1/2010 3:24:45 PM GMT
  • ElectricAyeElectricAye Posts: 4,561
    edited 2010-03-01 17:47
    How about having each Propeller chip hijack a blob of Physarum polycephalum for its own evil purposes?
    They're cheap and easy to feed, you know.

    www.newscientist.com/article/dn8718-robot-moved-by-a-slime-moulds-fears.html
  • wjsteelewjsteele Posts: 697
    edited 2010-03-01 19:48
    How about nitinol wire! Hook them up and glue a piece on each chip. Build a lattice structure and insulate the leads. Would be interesting to have only wires and prop chips (with power, of course, but you could also distribute that.)

    Bill
  • hover1hover1 Posts: 1,929
    edited 2010-03-01 20:07
    @Bill That's the same thing Mike suggested, although people might not get the difference between the scientific name and "brand name". Would be a great concept. I have some very small butterflys that use the·concept, but I am trying to move a 12" wing, (5 oz Depron) with no luck.

    Jim
    wjsteele said...
    How about nitinol wire! Hook them up and glue a piece on each chip. Build a lattice structure and insulate the leads. Would be interesting to have only wires and prop chips (with power, of course, but you could also distribute that.)

    Bill
  • jazzedjazzed Posts: 11,803
    edited 2010-03-01 20:44
    Why don't you try mounting Propeller boards and batteries in baskets tied small helium balloons ?

    You can have tiny fans mounted on orthogonal sides of the balloons (think cubes).
    I wonder if fish-net stockings would provide a good balloon container and equipment harness.

    You could use the Parallax wireless XBee modules for Propeller network communications.
  • HumanoidoHumanoido Posts: 5,770
    edited 2010-03-01 22:44
    The distance moved could be anywhere from 3-inches to 5 inches on up to the inside surface of a sphere with a diameter of roughly 2-feet. Don't ask me how the props will afix to the sphere's inside. I don't know at this time.

    Unfortunately it looks like helium balloon won't easily pull along prop chips inside the small sphere because they are contained in the sphere and the balloon would friction the sphere's interior and have a relatively large circle of confusion (although I like the overall concept), and wind chime power is a good idea by coordinating fans but I believe the accuracy is not enough due to the hover craft effect (floating around) and repeating pendulum effect if affixed on a pivot.

    I have explored muscle wires in the past, having built some robots, and at that time, the wire consumed considerable power to achieve any respectable degree of expansion contraction. I am sure there will be limited power available, but this is a good idea for more consideration. Not sure on the autonomous mobility factor though...

    In a confined area, power can be wirelessly beamed to the props for movement, but its likely the props may need to go into a stasis at that time of movement or have some kind of shielding.

    Raising Physarum polycephalum is a great idea, however it requires an environment and care that is not conducive to my environment. I'm sure they won't survive the desert-like conditions, extreme temperatures and poisonous air pollution here.

    Maybe I need to consider motors and take a look at some existing tiny robots. The H-Bridge is a good idea and should be in a chip for size considerations. Tiny solenoids and magnets can make tiny motors.

    I like the idea of magnetic levitation and a ride on the bullet train in Japan was amazingly smooth. If the chip can be magnetically coupled to the sphere... though maybe it's not power or cost effective...

    Need more input... more input... [noparse]:)[/noparse]



    humanoido
  • jazzedjazzed Posts: 11,803
    edited 2010-03-01 23:14
    You specified 3 to 5 inches within a diameter of 2 feet? Oops. Didn't see that.

    Wonder if you could get some steel ball bearings to roll around on several rails of a spherical strut frame under control of a Propeller.
    That would be interesting if not a start. Not a maglev exactly, more like a rail gun with low frequency for movement.
  • HumanoidoHumanoido Posts: 5,770
    edited 2010-03-01 23:43
    jazzed - wow, some kind of bearing that can work inverted in a track...
    many tracks can give some level of autonomy. As long as they don't
    crash into each other! May need track switching like a train.
    I like the idea, but the track would need to follow the inside curved
    sphere... how would you make a curved track that
    would not bind the bearings? or switch the tracks? Or... maybe each
    chip can own its own tracks. But... that would be a lot of tracks for a
    lot of chips, maybe they can overlap, but maybe not as there is the
    requirement to have a line of sight of visibility above the prop chip.
  • Martin HodgeMartin Hodge Posts: 1,246
    edited 2010-03-02 00:06
    There are some really tiny motors available! Just look at the itty bitty ones cell phones use for vibration. They're strong enough to sling an eccentric weight around. I bet you could find handfulls of them at surplus sites.

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    -MH
  • jazzedjazzed Posts: 11,803
    edited 2010-03-02 00:18
    humanoido said...
    jazzed - wow, some kind of bearing that can work inverted in a track...
    I was thinking a "virtual track" where many magnetic coils would have a peak resonant frequencies
    to hold and move the balls. Would a magnetic field really disturb propeller operation? I doubt it.
  • wjsteelewjsteele Posts: 697
    edited 2010-03-02 01:40
    hover1 said...
    @Bill That's the same thing Mike suggested...

    What's interesting is that I did my post before his... none of those other posts were there when I did mine. wink.gif

    [noparse][[/noparse]EDIT: Now that I look at this, my times are all messed up and out of sequence from when I enter them... the time zone is incorrect, too... even though I have mine set for eastern, it's showing -8 GMT, which isn't right!]

    Bill
  • Beau SchwabeBeau Schwabe Posts: 6,568
    edited 2010-03-02 02:22
    Just to keep this in perspective as to the relative size and room you have to work with, a 'sphere' with a 2ft diameter holding 170 Propellers would have an average distance of 3.26 inches in any direction from one Propeller to the next within the sphere... What ever the solution is, it's going to need to be small.

    If I did my math right...

    Area = 4 * pi * r = 12.57 square feet = 1809.6 square inches

    1809.6 / 170 = 10.64 square inches available per Propeller

    Sqrt of 10.64 = 3.26 inches from one Propeller to the next

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    Beau Schwabe

    IC Layout Engineer
    Parallax, Inc.
  • HumanoidoHumanoido Posts: 5,770
    edited 2010-03-02 02:36
    Beau Schwabe (Parallax) said...
    I know you said that this was a robot, but is it more of a kinetic art project? How much proximity from one prop to the next? You could have each prop drive an H-Bridge in turn driving a magnetic coil for an interesting 'swarm' interaction effect. ... just a thought, more details of your project would help.
    Well you could call it art - actually I'm thinking on several projects. One, where the chips move around autonomously. Two, where the chips move accordingly to create an invisibility shield. Three, where the chips move for advanced classroom apps. Four, where chips move for changing real time connection configurations. Five, where chips move in some artistic way that defies any explanation I can cite at this time.
    Beau Schwabe (Parallax) said...
    Just to keep this in perspective as to the relative size and room you have to work with, a 'sphere' with a 2ft diameter holding 170 Propellers would have an average distance of 3.26 inches in any direction from one Propeller to the next within the sphere... What ever the solution is, it's going to need to be small.
    I was guessing at 3 to 5-inches on the low side but your calculations appear exact. I know it's a bit tight like a shifting chinese puzzle. Thank you for showing that a larger diameter sphere will be more useful.

    humanoido

    Post Edited (humanoido) : 3/2/2010 2:44:56 AM GMT
  • HumanoidoHumanoido Posts: 5,770
    edited 2010-03-02 02:48
    Shmoopy said...
    There are some really tiny motors available! Just look at the itty bitty ones cell phones use for vibration. They're strong enough to sling an eccentric weight around. I bet you could find handfulls of them at surplus sites.
    Thanks - I have one or two of these in the box for study. They have a mass stuck on the end of the shaft, once removed there are no gears on the tiny motor. It has a high speed rotation which could be stepped down a little as its a DC motor. I think it needs step down with some tiny gears. They're small enough to attach to a dip prop chip.

    humanoido
Sign In or Register to comment.