Shop OBEX P1 Docs P2 Docs Learn Events
TDA7000 FM receiver chip vs Sparkfun FM Receiver Breakout Board (AR010) — Parallax Forums

TDA7000 FM receiver chip vs Sparkfun FM Receiver Breakout Board (AR010)

T&E EngineerT&E Engineer Posts: 1,396
edited 2010-01-03 22:19 in General Discussion
I remember years ago when I saw in an electronics magazine I subscribed to (Radio Electronics, Poptronics?, etc.) a project I built that used the TDA7000 FM radio on a chip and the project would fit inside of a pack of gum or something small like that. I think at that time Radio Shack may have sold the chip also. I can't find reference to it on the internet now. But I found a company that sells all the parts (oops no pcb!) for a TDA7000 FM receiver and I bought it yesterday. http://electronics-diy.com/store.php?sel=kits&sub=fm_receivers

But then today I remember seeing on Sparkfun a month or two back an FM receiver module that is I2C or SPI programmable. I bought that today along with associated recommended parts (e.g. 3.3v p/s board, opamp breakout, audio jack breakout, etc). http://www.sparkfun.com/commerce/product_info.php?products_id=8972

I thought the one from Spark fun would be a good project to interface to an SX chip probably in SPI since it is a bit easier I think than I2C.

Has anyone got any experience with either of these FM receiver modules/chips?

Sounds like something cool to play around with and interface to a project perhaps.

Comments

  • LeonLeon Posts: 7,620
    edited 2009-12-31 20:52
    I used the TDA7000 many years ago on a home-made PCB, it worked quite quite well. The main disadvantage was the large number of components it needed. The Brighton amateur radio club designed it into a very simple packet radio receiver as a club project for members. Si Labs makes FM radio chips. I haven't tried them but they look very easy to use.

    Leon

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    Amateur radio callsign: G1HSM
  • Phil Pilgrim (PhiPi)Phil Pilgrim (PhiPi) Posts: 23,514
    edited 2009-12-31 21:09
    Ditto Leon's recommendation of the Si Labs chips. I've not used one — yet — but, judging from their datasheets, they should be drop-dead simple to implement, and the number of external components required is virtually nil.

    -Phil
  • T&E EngineerT&E Engineer Posts: 1,396
    edited 2009-12-31 22:36
    These si labs chips look great. Ill have to look into these closer to see where I can get them at. I did not see them in DIP format but that just means a custom expensive pcb. Thanks for the news about these FM chips from si labs!
  • MikerocontrollerMikerocontroller Posts: 310
    edited 2010-01-01 03:33
    I'm going to order the Si4704 this week. Leon said that Si Labs might offer samples but I did not see FM tuners listed on the samples list on their website. Mouser has the chip for $9.21. What is the name of that chip format?
  • PJAllenPJAllen Banned Posts: 5,065
    edited 2010-01-01 13:41
    That article was presented a long time ago, 1988.

    If anyone wants to reminisce, here's the first page.· It probably wouldn't be right to post the entire article here.
    788 x 1088 - 822K
  • LeonLeon Posts: 7,620
    edited 2010-01-01 14:32
    It's QFN - quad-flatpack no leads.

    Leon

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    Amateur radio callsign: G1HSM
  • AleAle Posts: 2,363
    edited 2010-01-03 21:26
    I remember an article about the TDA7000... a long ago in an Electronics magazine published in Brazil and in Argentina (Saber (ed.) Electr
  • LeonLeon Posts: 7,620
    edited 2010-01-03 22:19
    No, mono only.

    Leon

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    Amateur radio callsign: G1HSM
Sign In or Register to comment.