Shop OBEX P1 Docs P2 Docs Learn Events
What are some work-around approaches to the lack of 40 pin DIPs? Or is this th — Parallax Forums

What are some work-around approaches to the lack of 40 pin DIPs? Or is this th

ElectricAyeElectricAye Posts: 4,561
edited 2009-08-19 18:19 in Propeller 1
So I wake up this morning and discover an asteroid has hit the earth and wiped out all inventories of the Propeller's 40 pin DIP version. What to do? I had just become comfortable with this notion of designing and assembling my own PCBs using the DIP and had left behind the world of kluging and wire-jumping protoboards everywhichway. But now what? Do I backslide into the gangly electrically noisy hellfire of kluging and wire-jumping protoboards everywhichway or do I try to move forward with those surface mount microbes? If surface mount is the answer, then what do I need to design into the PCB that is different? For example, do I need solder mask to make SMTs possible? Are there other components (bypass caps, etc.) that must be added on with the SMTs? Different solders? Extra voodoo to ascertain that Parallax isn't going to run out of smts, too?

I am not happy about this. cry.gif

Comments

  • Oldbitcollector (Jeff)Oldbitcollector (Jeff) Posts: 8,091
    edited 2009-08-18 14:43
    /me grabs an extra DIP 40...

    Bidding starts at $20.00... tongue.gif (Just Kidding!)


    We could always resort to this..
    www.warrantyvoid.us/tiki-index.php?page=Protoboard+Nano
    There's plenty of Protoboards still around.


    OBC

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    New to the Propeller?

    Visit the: The Propeller Pages @ Warranty Void.
  • Agent420Agent420 Posts: 439
    edited 2009-08-18 14:55
    The chips are electrically identical, only the physical package is different.

    It's a slight pita, but there are cheap 44 pin QFP -> DIP adapater boards out there ~$5 to ~$8.· This ebay example demonstrates how to solder the chip on the board.

    That example is inline, but there are DIP versions available as well... you'll need a 10mm x 10mm .8mm pitch board.
  • Cluso99Cluso99 Posts: 18,069
    edited 2009-08-18 15:14
    OBC: Well the few DIPs I have cost me >$20. I got them before the price went down and shipping to Oz cost an extra 50% :-(

    Are they on eBay yet???

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    Links to other interesting threads:

    · Home of the MultiBladeProps: TriBladeProp, RamBlade, TwinBlade,·SixBlade, website
    · Single Board Computer:·3 Propeller ICs·and a·TriBladeProp board (ZiCog Z80 Emulator)
    · Prop Tools under Development or Completed (Index)
    · Emulators: Micros eg Altair, and Terminals eg VT100 (Index) ZiCog (Z80), MoCog (6809)
    · Search the Propeller forums (via Google)
    My cruising website is: ·www.bluemagic.biz·· MultiBladeProp is: www.bluemagic.biz/cluso.htm
  • Toby SeckshundToby Seckshund Posts: 2,027
    edited 2009-08-18 15:46
    RS and Farnell are still charging about that here, in the UK.

    Just spilt tea into my KBD, imnterestimng typo's !

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    Style and grace : Nil point
  • ElectricAyeElectricAye Posts: 4,561
    edited 2009-08-18 16:00
    Agent420 said...
    ... there are cheap 44 pin QFP -> DIP adapater boards out there ~$5 to ~$8. .... DIP versions .. you'll need a 10mm x 10mm .8mm pitch board.

    Thanks, Agent, that helps reduce my panic/depression level this morning.
  • RevAaronRevAaron Posts: 30
    edited 2009-08-18 16:09
    Bwaah!

    I started typing up a smart-*** comment that began like this:

    "My approach? Buy some more DIPs from Mouser or Digikey..."

    And then I thought- I should make sure Mouser still had some, and order a few more while I was at it. They had hundreds when I received my order from them a week ago, which included two DIP Props. But... no! Gooseegg! DigiKey still had ~150 when I put that Mouser order in, and they're at zero too. Heck, they still had some stock at the end of last week- I have a tab with a DigiKey cart I forgot to finish paying for I left open on Friday, and the two DIP Props in there are shown as in-stock.

    Heck, I even asked the folks at DigiKey if having them in my cart somehow reserved them. No such luck.

    I wonder who bought up Mouser's remaining stock? Parallax? It hadn't been been doing down that quickly over the two week period I'd been watching them...

    There are a few suppliers which still have some at the old $13 price. Stock is low, though.
  • photomankcphotomankc Posts: 943
    edited 2009-08-18 16:21
    Jameco listed it not to long ago for about $13.00. Not sure if they still have any or not.
  • Toby SeckshundToby Seckshund Posts: 2,027
    edited 2009-08-18 16:26
    Cleaned my KBD !

    How much more does it cost to produce the 40 DIP version ? there is a fair bit more plastic and metal in them. Is it the Fab factories not liking the old packages.

    In this forum there seems to be far greater usage of them as the lend themselves to prototyping far better. Where as the QF will be better for the finished product ( whatever that is )

    I only have three Props, all 40 Dip, I shall put 2 of them them away into static bags and await the time that the are an exorbitant second hand price.

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    Style and grace : Nil point
  • Phil Pilgrim (PhiPi)Phil Pilgrim (PhiPi) Posts: 23,514
    edited 2009-08-18 16:39
    Guys, guys,

    Breathe into a paper bag! The new stock is only 2 1/2 months away, according to the product page. That's not exactly a glacial timescale and leaves plenty of time to build those clever Christmas gadgets that your loved ones will treasure for years to come! smile.gif

    -Phil
  • Agent420Agent420 Posts: 439
    edited 2009-08-18 16:39
    ^ I think through-hole is pretty much religated to the hobbiest market now, 99% of consumer goods are manufactured with smt parts.··There probably is an associated cost due to the lower volumes of dip packaging in general, though that is probably also related to the volume of the same die packed in smt for oem manufacturing...· In the case of the Propeller, I wonder how that plays out, because it seems like there hasn't been a big adoption of the Prop in oem products.
  • Oldbitcollector (Jeff)Oldbitcollector (Jeff) Posts: 8,091
    edited 2009-08-18 16:42
    I'll wait till next month when desperation is higher, and perhaps I'll do a another "Unofficial Contest"
    with a DIP40 as the prize. [noparse]:)[/noparse]

    OBC

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    New to the Propeller?

    Visit the: The Propeller Pages @ Warranty Void.
  • HollyMinkowskiHollyMinkowski Posts: 1,398
    edited 2009-08-18 17:04
    Thank heavens I have 10 of the dip chips here!

    If I only had access to the sm parts I'd have to ask one of the guys
    to assist me in designing test boards for it as I have no idea how to
    design a board and get it made by a circuit board place. Oh the guys would
    do it for me but then I'd have to endure hearing things like "I have to design
    this board for poor helpless Holly" grrrr

    I can make a pretty decent looking test board with the dip prop and thru hole parts.
    Just don't look at the back of the board though..what a mess! smile.gif

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    - Some mornings I wake up cranky.....but usually I just let him sleep in -
  • Toby SeckshundToby Seckshund Posts: 2,027
    edited 2009-08-18 19:14
    Holly

    I would have kept quiet about having the entire USA stock. My two are fairly safe, There's a 3000 miles moat.

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    Style and grace : Nil point
  • photomankcphotomankc Posts: 943
    edited 2009-08-18 19:26
    I've always wondered how places do development and testing of stuff when only SMT is available for the part. Is it all simulation and then they pump out some test boards with the industrial processes? It seems like there are so many factors that can lead to unforeseen interactions that it would be hard to imagine it's all done on printed boards and you just add the new part to the design based on quoted specs. I figure there are not many product houses with guys leaning over breadboards but I still see them in use a lot too even as more parts become SMT only packages. You still see lots of neat stuff being worked on with a breadboard stuck on the side of it.
  • Agent420Agent420 Posts: 439
    edited 2009-08-18 19:35
    I'm sure a lot of testing is done in simulation.· We use Proteus to help test some of our boards, you can even load code on a variety of pics, avrs, Basic Stamps etc and see how they react in a circuit (no Propeller model yet).· There are probably even more professional programs of that nature available for the big developers.

    Post Edited (Agent420) : 8/18/2009 7:47:44 PM GMT
  • lonesocklonesock Posts: 917
    edited 2009-08-18 19:37
    photomankc said...
    I've always wondered how places do development and testing of stuff when only SMT is available for the part. Is it all simulation and then they pump out some test boards with the industrial processes? It seems like there are so many factors that can lead to unforeseen interactions that it would be hard to imagine it's all done on printed boards and you just add the new part to the design based on quoted specs. I figure there are not many product houses with guys leaning over breadboards but I still see them in use a lot too even as more parts become SMT only packages. You still see lots of neat stuff being worked on with a breadboard stuck on the side of it.
    You can usually buy a demo-board from the chip manufacturer, similar to (but often much more expensive than) the propeller protoboard. They are good enough to do some basic testing of the product. SchmartBoard (www.schmartboard.com/) or similar can also get you up and running without designing an entire PCB yourself.

    Jonathan

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    lonesock
    Piranha are people too.
  • Carl HayesCarl Hayes Posts: 841
    edited 2009-08-18 20:25
    Agent420 said...
    ^ I think through-hole is pretty much religated to the hobbiest market now
    I am hobby
    You are hobbier
    He/she is hobbiest

    Naah --

    But maybe you meant "hobbyist"?

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    · -- Carl, nn5i@arrl.net
  • LeonLeon Posts: 7,620
    edited 2009-08-18 20:36
    photomankc said...
    I've always wondered how places do development and testing of stuff when only SMT is available for the part. Is it all simulation and then they pump out some test boards with the industrial processes? It seems like there are so many factors that can lead to unforeseen interactions that it would be hard to imagine it's all done on printed boards and you just add the new part to the design based on quoted specs. I figure there are not many product houses with guys leaning over breadboards but I still see them in use a lot too even as more parts become SMT only packages. You still see lots of neat stuff being worked on with a breadboard stuck on the side of it.

    Most 8-bit PICs, and all the 16-bit and 32-bit devices, have on-chip debugging hardware that allows in-circuit debugging and programming via a six-pin interface. Similar facilities are provided by most other chip manufacturers.

    Leon

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    Amateur radio callsign: G1HSM
    Suzuki SV1000S motorcycle
  • Clock LoopClock Loop Posts: 2,069
    edited 2009-08-18 23:22
    After seeing 40 dips left in the parallax stock, I dropped cash for 20 of them!

    No more smt wire soldering for me.

    You can all try this, its not easy, but it works.

    Oh, and don't break a leg when doing this.




    photomankc said...
    I've always wondered how places do development and testing of stuff when only SMT is available for the part. Is it all simulation and then they pump out some test boards with the industrial processes?

    When I worked for a company making prototype 3-phase High voltage brushless AC motor control boards, along with the cpu board, most of the testing of new chips and designs were just hacked out.

    We would design the new part into the design, check it, double check it, use the reference designs(usually in the datasheet) as a way to determine if we are doing it right.

    Then we would just order the pcb's, populate it, and debug it. 95% of the time the designs worked exactly as they were designed.

    Perhaps that says something about my skills but,, its really not a big deal to work with brand new parts. It helps to have a budget that can afford a few mistakes in the pcb (i.e. revisions)

    Post Edited (Clock Loop) : 8/18/2009 11:34:42 PM GMT
    640 x 480 - 206K
  • CounterRotatingPropsCounterRotatingProps Posts: 1,132
    edited 2009-08-19 00:49
    Toby Seckshund said...
    Holly

    I would have kept quiet about having the entire USA stock. My two are fairly safe, There's a 3000 miles moat.
    Toby, she doesn't have the *entire* US stock - I've got 7 hidden·away in a secret, locked vault. But shhhhh!

    [noparse]:)[/noparse])

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
  • waltcwaltc Posts: 158
    edited 2009-08-19 01:06
    Folks could always learn how to solder SMT components because eventually DIP components are going to go the way of the Yugo - extinct.

    And its not that hard to learn either. I learned it on the job without guidance with just some soldering paste and a variable temp soldering iron. Wasn't up to NASA specs but it did the job.
  • MicrocontrolledMicrocontrolled Posts: 2,461
    edited 2009-08-19 01:47
    I will keep my DIP Props safe, all 3 of them. (MWAHAHAHAHA!!)

    Because keeping them in a safe for 2 1/2 months is different then not having them at all.smile.gif

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    Computers are microcontrolled.

    Robots are microcontrolled.
    I am microcontrolled.

    But you·can·call me micro.

    If it's not Parallax then don't even bother.

    I have changed my avatar so that I will no longer be confused with others who use generic avatars (and I'm more of a Prop head then a BS2 nut, anyway)



  • mparkmpark Posts: 1,305
    edited 2009-08-19 05:57
    Carl Hayes said...

    But maybe you meant "hobbyist"?

    Thank you, Carl! That's one of my (many) pet peeves.

    Just for emphasis: the word is hobbyist, not hobbiest.

    And it wasn't even microcontrolled's error this time.
  • Phil Pilgrim (PhiPi)Phil Pilgrim (PhiPi) Posts: 23,514
    edited 2009-08-19 06:08
    I first saw "hobbiest" used in Byte magazines back in the late '70s and early '80s. It still grates.

    -Phil
  • Toby SeckshundToby Seckshund Posts: 2,027
    edited 2009-08-19 08:37
    There seems to be a spelling/grammar police force forming on this forum.

    I try to get it right, most of the time, but as a nerdish young chap I played with electronics and didn't read all those books. The wonderful education system left us all equally thick and so I see myself as a typical engineer fantastically educated, by myself and real life, in narrow subjects.

    I do not see the spelling mistakes until they are posted. I'll try to get most things right, or revert to TXT speak. How about an entire thread done in the "right first and last letters, padded to the correct lenth"

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    Style and grace : Nil point
  • Agent420Agent420 Posts: 439
    edited 2009-08-19 10:00
    I've been working on the Text To Speech project, I must have been thinking phonetically :-)

    Geez some of you folks are uptight.

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
  • MicrocontrolledMicrocontrolled Posts: 2,461
    edited 2009-08-19 18:19
    The spelling police are on a warpath! Quick, use spell check!! smile.gif

    And no, I do not text. (contrary to popular belief)
    I now use FireFox which just saved me from spelling "contrary" wrong. smile.gif

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    Computers are microcontrolled.

    Robots are microcontrolled.
    I am microcontrolled.

    But you·can·call me micro.

    If it's not Parallax then don't even bother.

    I have changed my avatar so that I will no longer be confused with others who use generic avatars (and I'm more of a Prop head then a BS2 nut, anyway)



Sign In or Register to comment.