Shop OBEX P1 Docs P2 Docs Learn Events
How to get a HAM license ? — Parallax Forums

How to get a HAM license ?

BeanBean Posts: 8,129
edited 2009-07-15 19:21 in General Discussion
I'd like to get a HAM license to experiment with long range communications.
But I have no idea how to go about it.
How do I study for the test ? Where do I take the test ? Etc.
Any suggestions ? I live near Harrisburg PA. Any HAMs in the area that can help ?

Bean.


▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Money is not that important....In the grand scheme of things.

·
«13

Comments

  • Mike GreenMike Green Posts: 23,101
    edited 2009-06-25 00:40
    I'm sure there are several amateur radio clubs in the Harrisburg area and any one of them could help you. A quick Google search turned up this: hrac.tripod.com/
  • CounterRotatingPropsCounterRotatingProps Posts: 1,132
    edited 2009-06-25 00:49
    Bean, go to the library and see if they have older copies of the ARRL handbook.
    Or go here:

    http://www.arrl.org/

    the grand-daddy of all US HAM radio

    HTH
    - Howard

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
  • PJAllenPJAllen Banned Posts: 5,065
    edited 2009-06-25 01:03
  • danieldaniel Posts: 231
    edited 2009-06-25 02:58
    Bean (Hitt Consulting) said...
    I'd like to get a HAM license ...
    Any suggestions ?


    You have the good fortune asking this question on the eve of the 24-hour amateur radio operating event called Field Day. Field Day is a sort of a large scale Emergency Communications drill that currently involves more than 30,000 hams annually in the US. We set up a temporary site, attempt to make as many different contacts as possible, and then tear-down the site. Many Field Day sites are operated by clubs, and welcome visitors, especially those visitors who express an interest in becoming licensed.

    Go to ARRL's Field Day Locator (www.arrl.org/contests/announcements/fd/locator.php) and enter "Harrisburg, PA" (or whatever your point of interest) in the Location search field. Searching for Harrisburg shows 4 sites listed; and I know that the South Mountain Radio Amateurs SMRA (Carlisle) is now offering license testing at their monthly meetings. Not all sites list on the ARRL locator, so check out your local newspapers--they may mention a site near you.

    If you enter W3ACH in the search field, you will find us a little farther south in Chambersburg. And if you come around a mealtime (every 6 hours from Noon Saturday) I'll feed you--in addition to being the our club's president, I'm the Field Day chef.

    Most field day sites will be setting up from sometime Saturday morning, and the operating portion starts 2:00pm and continues until at least 2:00 pm Sunday afternoon. Stop in somewhere, and undoubtedly some ham will try to get you to make some contacts.

    73,
    Daniel KB3MUN

    Post Edited (daniel) : 6/25/2009 3:05:16 AM GMT
  • W9GFOW9GFO Posts: 4,010
    edited 2009-06-25 03:57
    Bean (Hitt Consulting) said...

    How do I study for the test ?

    My two 13 year olds studied using HamTestOnline. We are now a family of four HAMs, W9KFO, W9JFO, W9LFO and of course myself.

    Rich H
  • Phil Pilgrim (PhiPi)Phil Pilgrim (PhiPi) Posts: 23,514
    edited 2009-06-25 06:33
    Rich,

    If you now live in WA, how'd they get W9 numbers?

    Bean,

    Take SRLM's advice. The Ham Radio License Manual is what got me going again after a long hiatus. The online tests are a big help, too.

    -Phil (AD7YF)
  • Beau SchwabeBeau Schwabe Posts: 6,568
    edited 2009-06-25 07:24
    Something that I have wondered... the theoretical limit of call signs is 60,466,176 if you are using alphanumeric A-Z and 0-9 and only have 5 digits, but what is the "real" number of possibilities? ... assuming the first two digits are the state code as Phil points out the remaining 3 digits would give 46,656 possibilities per state , althought this rule may be broken to expand for more largly populated states, otherwise it's just over 2 million for all 50 states. I just was curious what the maximum number of call signs would be if every allocated possibility were used.

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    Beau Schwabe

    IC Layout Engineer
    Parallax, Inc.
  • LoopyBytelooseLoopyByteloose Posts: 12,537
    edited 2009-06-25 07:52
    Wow~~~~ you can test on line now? That's very user friendly for everyone.

    When I was 12, you had to test for morse code and wait for a local exam. It has gotten much easier. My code never got up to speed, so I never got it. But I did get my Boy Scout First Class, which required I recite the code from memory. I wonder a bit about the Morse Code in Chinese.....

    The only drawback is that components have gotten smaller and smaller with more and more integration. So it is more abstract for a kid to learn and apply.

    Can one get an overseas call sign for starters? The ARRL is by and far the best resource for license information, also usually the cheapest. If you need more fundamental theory, the NEETs course is free and very useful.

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    Ain't gadetry a wonderful thing?

    aka G. Herzog [noparse][[/noparse] 黃鶴 ] in Taiwan

    Post Edited (Loopy Byteloose) : 6/25/2009 7:57:18 AM GMT
  • Phil Pilgrim (PhiPi)Phil Pilgrim (PhiPi) Posts: 23,514
    edited 2009-06-25 08:35
    Loopy,

    The online tests are for practice only. The real thing is administered by a trio of local hams who are registered with the FCC. I took my tests at a local fire hall. It sure beats going to the Federal Building in the nearest big city for an appontment with humorless bureaucrats. I still remember my General Class test at the Federal Building in Indianapolis when I was a teen. Back then there was a Morse code test, too. That's gone away — a fact which I have mixed feelings about.

    Chris,

    U.S. callsigns must begin with W, K, N, or A. There can be another letter after that. The number (0 - 9) is regional. This is followed by two or three letters. So the total number of so-called "2x3" (2 letters, number, three letters) callsigns is 4 * 26 * 10 * 26 * 26 * 26 = 18,279,040. There are also 1x2, 1x3, and 2x2 callsigns. It appears that the FCC does not recycle them either. My old callsign from the '60s would still be available to me if I wanted it, since it has not been reassigned.

    -Phil

    Post Edited (Phil Pilgrim (PhiPi)) : 6/25/2009 8:42:47 AM GMT
  • AJMAJM Posts: 171
    edited 2009-06-25 13:43
    Bean,

    Let me know how this turns out. I am in the same area

    --AJ
  • ProcessingData...ProcessingData... Posts: 208
    edited 2009-06-25 13:48
    I just got my license just a few days ago; it wasn't hard to study for it. I just practiced the online tests until i could get a reasonable score, and then I took the test. Go ahead and shoot for it. -- KF7DHP

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    Basic Stamp,···· Propeller,·· · SX,·· FUN!


    START:·
    >Proccessing Data. . . .··
    >Task Complete. . .·.
    >Saving Data. . . .
    >Entering SLEEP Mode. . . .
    >Signing OFF


    ·
  • Cluso99Cluso99 Posts: 18,069
    edited 2009-06-25 14:00
    I never did manage to do my morse. Each time I would get to 5wpm I would forget it and back to square 1. At least I don't need it now.
    VK2ZTZ licenced but not active.

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    Links to other interesting threads:

    · Home of the MultiBladeProps: TriBladeProp, RamBlade, TwinBlade,·SixBlade, website
    · Single Board Computer:·3 Propeller ICs·and a·TriBladeProp board (ZiCog Z80 Emulator)
    · Prop Tools under Development or Completed (Index)
    · Emulators: Micros eg Altair, and Terminals eg VT100 (Index) ZiCog (Z80), MoCog (6809)
    · Search the Propeller forums (via Google)
    My cruising website is: ·www.bluemagic.biz·· MultiBladeProp is: www.bluemagic.biz/cluso.htm
  • W9GFOW9GFO Posts: 4,010
    edited 2009-06-25 16:01
    Phil Pilgrim (PhiPi) said...
    Rich,

    If you now live in WA, how'd they get W9 numbers?


    My original call was KD7DPY. I especially did not care for the "DPY" part so I applied for a vanity call. When the others got their licenses they also applied for vanities. It is only $12 for ten years, not too bad for being able to choose your own callsign.

    Regarding total number of calls available, you need to alter that calculation just a bit. There are some two letter prefix combinations that are not allowed. I haven't looked it up in a while but I think KA, KI, KO and some others are prohibited.

    Rich H
  • HollyMinkowskiHollyMinkowski Posts: 1,398
    edited 2009-06-25 17:41
    @W9GFO

    You have the coolest ham call EVER!
    I love that old film..now every time I see it I will think of you.

    CQ Vega... this is W9GFO wink.gif
  • W9GFOW9GFO Posts: 4,010
    edited 2009-06-25 17:53
    HollyMinkowski said...
    @W9GFO

    You have the coolest ham call EVER!
    I love that old film..now every time I see it I will think of you.

    CQ Vega... this is W9GFO wink.gif

    Thanks Holly blush.gif

    Old film? It's not that old!

    Rich H
  • danieldaniel Posts: 231
    edited 2009-06-25 18:51
    Sorry to break in, but briefly back to Bean's question...
    Bean (Hitt Consulting) said...
    How do I study for the test ? Where do I take the test ?

    I just received notice of a Technician Class class / exam that will be happening on August 29 & 30 at West Earl Fire Company, 14 School Lane, Brownstown, PA 17508.
    This two-day class culminate in a testing session and is located northeast of Lancaster. Send me a PM with an email address if interested in the flyer.

    Sorry for the interruption, and thanks for sharing the bandwidth.

    Daniel KB3MUN
  • CounterRotatingPropsCounterRotatingProps Posts: 1,132
    edited 2009-06-25 21:20
    Bean,

    for several months now, I've been mulling over getting the tech class license for experimenting with long-distance communications too.

    so I'm curious as to what you're interested in trying - do you have anything specific in mind?

    - Howard

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
  • LeonLeon Posts: 7,620
    edited 2009-06-25 21:59
    It would be a good idea to check what you are authorised to do with an amateur radio license. For instance, in the UK you may only communicate with other radio amateurs, or use radio for remote control of another station. Using it to send data from one point to another isn't allowed, and unattended operation of a transmitter is only allowed in certain circumstances, like beacon operation. It's probably the same in most countries.

    Leon

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    Amateur radio callsign: G1HSM
    Suzuki SV1000S motorcycle
  • danieldaniel Posts: 231
    edited 2009-06-25 22:40
    In the US, several possibilities are explicitly permitted, for example Telemetry, or Telecommand of model craft.

    The FCC rules, informally known as Part 97, govern ham operations in the US; for example, sections 97.215 & 97.216 www.arrl.org/FandES/field/regulations/news/part97/c.html#215 shows the following:

    §97.215 Telecommand of model craft.
    
    An amateur station transmitting signals to control a model craft may be operated as follows:
    
    (a) The station identification procedure is not required for transmissions directed only to the 
        model craft, provided that a label indicating the station call sign and the station licensee's
        name and address is affixed to the station transmitter.
    
    (b) The control signals are not considered codes or ciphers intended to obscure the meaning 
        of the communication.
    
    (c) The transmitter power must not exceed 1 W.
    
    §97.217 Telemetry.
    
    Telemetry transmitted by an amateur station on or within 50 km of the Earth's surface is not 
    considered to be codes or ciphers intended to obscure the meaning of communications. 
    
    



    A little earlier in the rules, section 97.211 discusses telecommand of a space station.

    And then there is an whole other section of rules, called Part 15 www.arrl.org/tis/info/part15.html (devices operating under part 15 do not generally require license, but need to take care to behave nicely in as RF manner).

    So it would depend on what Bean has in mind.

    BTW, I understand that RC systems of aircraft and watercraft using ham frequencies are 'popular', as the frequencies used are not as 'crowded' as the standard non-licensed RC transmitters use. See www.fly-imaa.org/imaa/hfarticles/electro/v8-4-15.html--some of the ham license requirements have been 'relaxed' since that article was apparently written in 1988. See also en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio-controlled_aircraft#Frequencies_and_sub-channels.

    Daniel
  • CounterRotatingPropsCounterRotatingProps Posts: 1,132
    edited 2009-06-25 23:41
    §97.215 = RC stuff,
    §97.217 = Telemetry

    Daniel,

    .217 seems like of the most interest for data communications only. I read this a while back, and just again now...
    Assuming the correct class of license, band, etc., you guys do bi-directional telemetry often, right?

    But does station to station have to be between two different HAMS, or could I say control my home-based Propeller with my office-based Propeller using telemetry and one call sign? (Aside to Leon - I do understand your concerns.)

    thanks,
    Howard

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
  • LeonLeon Posts: 7,620
    edited 2009-06-26 00:01
    I don't think you can use §97.217 as a basis for remote control like that - telemetry has a very specific meaning according to the FCC: "(45) Telemetry. A one-way transmission of measurements at a distance from the measuring instrument."

    You could monitor something using a transmitter at home with a receiver in the office, presumably.

    Two-way communication has to be between two radio amateurs.

    Leon

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    Amateur radio callsign: G1HSM
    Suzuki SV1000S motorcycle

    Post Edited (Leon) : 6/26/2009 12:28:12 AM GMT
  • CounterRotatingPropsCounterRotatingProps Posts: 1,132
    edited 2009-06-26 00:24
    Well, the question is can you guys do both telemetry and monitoring, bi-directionally?

    - H

    [noparse][[/noparse]edit - oops, I ment to ask both telemetry and control bi-directionally]

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔


    Post Edited (CounterRotatingProps) : 6/26/2009 2:05:07 AM GMT
  • WBA ConsultingWBA Consulting Posts: 2,935
    edited 2009-06-26 00:40
    When I took a sample test for the first time I nearly passed it with just skimming through a basic "pass the test" book. After studying with a friend over pizza a couple times, I passed with only missing one question. HAM is a great hobby that can bleed over into other hobbies. (Before everyone had a cell phone, I played rescuer for a couple different motorists out in the middle of no-where with a 2 meter handheld).

    There's actually quite a bit you can do with HAM and microcontrollers. As already mentioned, start with ARRL.org and a local club.

    73,

    KD6QIF

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    Andrew Williams
    WBA Consulting
    IT / Web / PCB / Audio
  • danieldaniel Posts: 231
    edited 2009-06-26 00:54
    Howard,

    As Leon points out, telemetry has specific meaning.

    Actually, the rules in Part 97 are not that hard to read and understand; and I strongly recommend such an exercise. Or as some other ham says regularly, Read the Rules; Heed the Rules.

    Go to that ARRL site with the Part 97 listing (a link with 'bite sized' frames is www.arrl.org/FandES/field/regulations/news/part97/ and consider the following:

    Read all of Subpart C--Special Operations (sections 97.201 thru 97.221),
    In light of the definitions in 97.3, especially the words:
         Automatic control
         Auxiliary station
         Control operator
         Control point
         Harmful interference
         Local control
         Remote control
         Telecommand
         Telemetry
         and the emission type Data
    And keeping in mind the distinction between a Station license and an Operator license (sections 97.5 & 97.9),
    And pretty soon it should all start making sense.
    
    



    Think of Part 97 as the datasheet for ham operations, and choose to work within the characterizations of that datasheet. With silicon parts, not understanding or following a datasheet's recommendations causes one to become familiar with the magic smoke. With violations of Part 97, you may find opportunity to become more familiar with FCC sanctions.

    Finally, find a radio club or an elmer (ham-speak for a mentor) in your area who will help you with any difficulties or questions.

    What you are asking, I think, is whether you could receive telemetry from a measurements device and send telecommands to that device. You do need to read the 'datasheet' to be sure that you can.

    73,
    Daniel KB3MUN

    edit: It would also be prudent to mention following the Part 97 sections as germane: §97.111 Authorized transmissions; and §97.113 Prohibited transmissions.

    Post Edited (daniel) : 6/26/2009 1:03:46 AM GMT
  • CounterRotatingPropsCounterRotatingProps Posts: 1,132
    edited 2009-06-26 02:40
    thanks for the detailed reply, Daniel

    I will study those sections again - have read them in passing before. I've always assumed that since you guys can remotely control repeaters and what not, that telecommands to a telemetry device would be ok (heeding the rules of course).

    If you don't mind an Elmer moment, please, let me ask this again in a more specific way - the answer would be a simple yes/no:

    Assuming this is permissible - let's say we have the proper classes of license, are in band, within power limits, and compile with the rules totally.

    I give you a gadget that you put in your shack - and I have a clone of the device in mine. (Both are either transmitters out-right or can connect into a rig to xmit.) When I press button X on mine, it telecommands to yours. Your device then reads the temperature in your shack and telemeters that back to me, the temp showing up on my gadet's LCD. And you can press button X on your device which does the same - and you see the temp of my shack on your LCD. So, yes, bi-directional telecommands and telemetry.

    Assume we've complied with all the rules, is this possible, Y/N ?

    If it's not, I may just try it using ISM - I have near line of sight, but it's about 12 miles.

    thanks again
    - Howard
    @Aside to Bean - don't mean to hijack your thread... I hope this is of interest to you too [noparse]:)[/noparse]

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
  • danieldaniel Posts: 231
    edited 2009-06-26 03:16
    IANAL and all that, but it seems to me the short answer is...


    Yes.


    I would analyze it as a simpler setup.

    Consider a measurements device at location X that can receive a telecommand from location Y to initiate a measurement sample and telemetry transmission of that sample. In this instance, the ham at location Y would be the control operator.

    Don't muddy the waters with the bi-directional bit. Instead just also 'install' a 'second' measurements device at Y to respond with telemetry to a telecommand from location X. With this 'second' device, the control operator would be at location X.

    And pay careful attention to that word pecuniary and the rest of section 97.113.

    An alternative might be to place a weather-station (or your temperature measuring device) at the remote location, and setup an APRS beacon to make the data available (see, for example, a nearby setup www.findu.com/cgi-bin/find.cgi?call=CW1662, and click on the left-side 'Weather Data' link).

    Undoubtedly there are dozens of other ways to do the task as a ham; as for non-ham means, I'd probably start with Part 15's 'Home-built Devices', or something along the lines of Ethernet segments linked by an RF bridge.

    73,
    Daniel KB3MUN

    Post Edited (daniel) : 6/26/2009 3:22:00 AM GMT
  • LeonLeon Posts: 7,620
    edited 2009-06-26 05:15
    HF radio propagation is very variable, with different bands being usable at different times of the day. It's also affected by solar activity, and conditions are very poor at present for most of the time. VHF and UHF propagation are more predictable, but the range is limited.

    Leon

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    Amateur radio callsign: G1HSM
    Suzuki SV1000S motorcycle
  • danieldaniel Posts: 231
    edited 2009-06-26 11:46
    Beau Schwabe (Parallax) said...
    Something that I have wondered...what the maximum number of call signs would be if every allocated possibility were used.

    I think the definitive answer to this (for all radio services in the US) could be calculated from the information in this link edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2007/octqtr/pdf/47cfr2.302.pdf; second page is numbered 629 and has the information relevant to amateur radio.

    Daniel KB3MUN
  • Mike GreenMike Green Posts: 23,101
    edited 2009-06-26 15:21
    Bean,
    Look at §97.221 for a description of an automatically controlled digital station. This probably covers what you want to do.
Sign In or Register to comment.