ADC reference higher than Vdd
Bobb Fwed
Posts: 1,119
I haven't had time to look through the datasheet completely, but I didn't see anything on my brief read through. Does anyone know, can you give the MCP3008 (10-bit version of the MCP3208) reference pin a higher voltage than the input (Vdd)? The concept I have is to put a 4.096V reference on the reference pin. I am powering the IC with 3.3V. I could put a 2.5V reference, but I have found that the output voltages is less consistent over wide temperature ranges than the 4.096V reference ICs, not to mention the 4.096V ones are much more common.
Datasheet
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
April, 2008: when I discovered the answers to all my micro-computational-botherations!
Datasheet
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
April, 2008: when I discovered the answers to all my micro-computational-botherations!
Comments
Leon
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Amateur radio callsign: G1HSM
Suzuki SV1000S motorcycle
I was already typing "It is usually limited to some diode's forward voltage higher than Vdd"...and there it was.
...so probably (at best) limited to 3.9V reference...but that doesn't really exist...so I am stuck with the 2.5V.
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
April, 2008: when I discovered the answers to all my micro-computational-botherations!
Why not just power the chip with your 4.096V, and then use the correct voltage dividers on all the lines that communicate with the 3.3v device.
I did this when I had to operate a 3.3v lcd with a 5v microcontroller.
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
TERMS OF USE: MIT License
"Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any pers...........................
..............................OMITTED FOR FORUM...............................................
.................. OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE. "
I did consider powering the ADC at 5V (already have a 5V circuit on the board) then reference at 4.096. But I don't have much room left on the board...I'd have to redesign almost the entire board to make room for the resistors between the ADC and the prop.
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
April, 2008: when I discovered the answers to all my micro-computational-botherations!
If it's the same board you posted in the other thread, you'd have plenty of room if you changed your passives to surface-mount.
-Phil
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
April, 2008: when I discovered the answers to all my micro-computational-botherations!
-Phil
I would have to say that smt soldering is not that easy. You do need a precise temp gun, and if you have bad eyes, then you most def need a microscope. smt soldering sucks when you SCREW UP. bridged pins suck. .,,,, they suck.
Leon
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Amateur radio callsign: G1HSM
Suzuki SV1000S motorcycle
-Phil
I think a better choice would be a 0.1% tolerance resistor voltage divider. Then I could customize exactly what the reference voltage is.
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
April, 2008: when I discovered the answers to all my micro-computational-botherations!
The right solution really depends on the nature of your input signal. Is in centred on 2 volts? Is it buffered / driven with a low source impedance? You mention a wide temp range - I assume this is important.
Also you can run the adc off 5 volts and interface in to the prop via resistors. It can sample faster at 5v.
tubular