U.S. Lags Globally in Robotics Development
www.cra.org/govaffairs/blog/archives/000737.html
Maybe the U.S. government can buy researchers a bunch of Boe-Bots and have them spend time in this forum. They could learn a lot here.
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
OS-X: because making Unix user-friendly was easier than debugging Windows
links:
My band's website
Our album on the iTunes Music Store
Maybe the U.S. government can buy researchers a bunch of Boe-Bots and have them spend time in this forum. They could learn a lot here.
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
OS-X: because making Unix user-friendly was easier than debugging Windows
links:
My band's website
Our album on the iTunes Music Store
Comments
-Mike
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
======
······ I'll try everything once [noparse]:)[/noparse]
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
PG
The more you learn, the more you find you don't know. It is neverending Confucous 550 BC
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
OS-X: because making Unix user-friendly was easier than debugging Windows
links:
My band's website
Our album on the iTunes Music Store
I'd have to disagree. The point of engineering school (at the college level) is not to teach someone how to hook up a circuit or to write some code, it is to teach them how to think and design reliable products. Certainly, when you look around the internet and build lots of projects you're a capable roboticist (or whatever), but you're not an engineer. An engineer must know how to plan for the worst case, to build projects to specifications, and so on.
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
"THE ONLY TRUE WISDOM IS IN KNOWING YOU KNOW NOTHING." - SOCRATES
The more you learn, the more you find you don't know. It is neverending. Confucous 550 BC.
Learning mandaran may also be a good idea
How many Japanese teams showed up for the Sparkfun AVC?
Follow the link and see: http://www.sparkfun.com/commerce/news.php?id=259
The Japanese seemed to be enamored with bipeds and industrial robots.
Personally, I find my UAVs ( http://diydrones.com/ )and UGVs much more useful in real life·than contest bipeds and industrial robots.
Just a thought.
Regards,
TCIII
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
If you are going to send·a Robot·to save the world, you·better make sure it likes it the way it is!
How many serious researchers showed up to the Sparkfun AVC? None (as far as I can tell). The AVC was more "geek" oriented, while the article linked above is more research/industry oriented.
There are many more industrial robots than UAVs and UGV combined. Industrial robots form a basis for modern life by allowing manfucaturers to make more product faster, cheaper, and more precisely than ever before. UAVs and UGVs more fun? Probably. More useful? I'd say not.
"I admit they do like to make their robot designs humanoid or animal like."
I just think·the Japanese are better explained as artists than roboticists. It seems, for the most part, that they just like to use the same designs as everybody else, just with different looks and different movement capabilities.
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
PG
You miss the point.
Yes, we have plenty of commerical/industrial robots in the US and they definitely support our manufacturing capabilities.
But, what is the source of budding scientists and engineers for the universities and industries in the US? Precisely the "geeks" seen at the AVC.
They are learning what it take to build better and more efficient UAVs and UGVs that will take part in our Future Combat Systems.
IMHO UAVs and UGVs·might have a greater impact on our future than standardized biped robots.
Have you ever attended a US BEST, FIRST or VEX robotics competition?
Do the Japanese show up at the DARPA autonomous vehicle competition each year?
Creativity does not always come from within a university/industrial research·lab. Occasionally it comes from a garage.
Just a thought.
Regards,
TCIII
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
If you are going to send·a Robot·to save the world, you·better make sure it likes it the way it is!
Now, not to sound like a brown noser, but to me, Chip seems to be one of those GREAT engineers I mentioned above - the type with real world application experience, the booksmarts and theory. I'm not badmouthing either group - the booksmart engineers or the technicians. I'm just saying that to be great in either area, you DO need schooling of some kind, AND knowledge of the real world. However, most engineers seem to be more booksmart, and technicians knowing specifics, but not theory.
My $0.02.
My $0.04.
When I graduated from CSUN in SolCal with my EE degree in 1978, I had a design notebook that was almost 4" thick and my prof would not give it back to me when I graduated.
The reason: He was also an instructor in Electrical Engineering at UCLA which had just been put on probation because the engineering students knew the theory, but could not design a piece of electrical/electronic equipment that could function in the real world. The CSUN Engineering Dept was going to be audited in the fall of 1978 and he wanted to prove to the audit team that CSUN graduating engineers could design and build for the real world environment. Hence he kept all of our design notebooks for proof!
Before I graduated from CSUN, I had spent 6 years in the USN as an electronic tech and nuc power tech and had some real hands-on experience before going back to college. My ability to solder and troubleshoot really came in handy. I consider myself to be a much better Systems Engineer because of my tech background. I appreciate what the techs at work can do and they respect me as a very capable engineer. Wouldn't have it any other way.
I love robotics and electronics and am constantly integrating other builder's great ideas and concepts into my own projects. I like to think out of the box when I can and try not to reinvent the wheel whenever possible.
Just a thought.....again.
Regards,
TCIII
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
If you are going to send·a Robot·to save the world, you·better make sure it likes it the way it is!
Post Edited (Tom C) : 5/26/2009 12:03:45 AM GMT
I have read your posts with interest. I just got $9,000 dollars from president o'bama to go to school this next year.
It makes me sad to hear you say that you are to old to go to school. I am 50 years old, and back in school, this time looking for a degree in mechanical engineering.
Back in the 1980's I went through a vocational educational program, that after two years was supposed to qualify me for an an apprentaceship out at the local air base. Buy my last semester there they shut down the base, and these guys with 20 years of experience started showing up at my college thinking that more education might qualify them for a job.
So for me, it was into programming for a while, and the excitement of watching the world wide web grow, and setting up my own little online store for a while. But then came the tech wreck, and bigger outfits really started to consolidate the online stores and force us little guys out.
So anyway, I don't agree with what you say about you being to old to go to school. You got to figure that folks are starting to live a lot longer than they used to, well at least in my family. You could still be alive when you are 85 or 90 and chances are that by then, folks with a lot of work skills and experience will be more valuable than they are today. Seems like the class distinction between engineers and machinists has been erased by the computer. The guy working the drill press has been replaced by a robot, sure, and the guy doing the low level design calculations has been replaced by the cad software, but the guys with the brain power, working in the shop and on the drawing board, seems like in the future they are more and more going to be merged into the same kind of guy. So your experience will be really helpful, but maybe think about checking out some school, especially if you can get the government to pay for it?
Eric, at Sac state
Glad you're here then. I've found that these forums are one of the most influential factors in my English (as in school type English) education. I believe that I'm a better writer (and speller!) for my ~2000 posts that I've manages to scrounge up.