Shop OBEX P1 Docs P2 Docs Learn Events
Measuring CRAZY cold temperatures with the prop — Parallax Forums

Measuring CRAZY cold temperatures with the prop

PhilldapillPhilldapill Posts: 1,283
edited 2009-02-24 09:15 in Propeller 1
Just curious about this... You can't really find a temp. sensor that measures wayyyy down in temperature, like say, -150C, right? Well, one that is fairly cheap at least. I've given this some thought, so here's my idea. This should probably be in the sandbox, but I may in fact need the propellers math abilities for this...

In a voltage divider, you have a positive input, a negative input, and a "divided" output. I think we all here have a general sense of how this works. Temperature is very similiar to voltage and current... What I have in mind, is making a "temperature divider". This would involve getting heavily insulated metal rod, with exposed ends, and a very small exposed area somewhere between. One end, would be exposed to the ambient air, and would have a temp sensor on it. The other end, would be connected to the VERY cold substance you are trying to measure. Somewhere between, which would be a very exact known spot, would have a second temperature sensor.

My thinking is, this would form a temperature gradient, and if you know precisely WHERE on that gradient you are measuring, and precisely WHAT the temperature is there and on the ambient end, you can calculate the COLD end fairly well.

Am I correct? If so, does this involve simple linear equations like a voltage divider, or would we need to use logarithms or any other functions that the Propeller is capable of?

Comments

  • mctriviamctrivia Posts: 3,772
    edited 2009-02-23 03:02
    an infrared senser should be able to measure all the way to 0k
  • SRLMSRLM Posts: 5,045
    edited 2009-02-23 04:34
    These may help:

    http://www.owlnet.rice.edu/~ceng402/ed1projects/proj01/markcov/proj31.html
    http://www.springerlink.com/content/322153800v13g8k3/fulltext.pdf
    http://www.engin.umich.edu/class/che360/projects/rod.html

    I don't think it will be easy, although I don't have any experience in this area. All the graphs that I saw had lots of curves... The last link mentions Fourier series, so there goes your simplicity.
  • Shane De CataniaShane De Catania Posts: 67
    edited 2009-02-23 04:44
    Sounds like the perfect job for a K type thermocouple. They are very cheap and can measure below -200 degC (with some extra hardware required to interface to the prop of course)

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    News Flash!... Energizer Bunny arrested and charged with battery.
  • ElectricAyeElectricAye Posts: 4,561
    edited 2009-02-23 07:18
    mctrivia said...
    an infrared senser should be able to measure all the way to 0k

    I'm not an expert, but I think the IR sensor would have to be at 0 K in order to make that determination.

    But I'll second Shane's idea of using a thermocouple.

    Philldapill's idea isn't out of this world, though. I just think it would be unnecessarily complex as heat transfer through a rod/forming a gradient could get fairly involved, for example you might possibly have to take into account convection currents, air flow around the rod, thermal conductance as a function of temperature, etc.
  • mctriviamctrivia Posts: 3,772
    edited 2009-02-23 07:28
    the beauty of infared sensors are they do not need to be in direct contact with what you are measuring. They measure the amount of heat radiating off it and thus in theory at least should be able to measure as low as 0K(-273C). In reality cheaper ones are probably not sensitive enough to go that low but I have a gun style one I purchased for $20 that measures between -99C(174K) and 999C(1272K) The limit is due to only having a 3 digit display.

    I can't seem to find were to buy one this good any more though [noparse]:([/noparse]

    Post Edited (mctrivia) : 2/23/2009 7:40:17 AM GMT
  • TreeLabTreeLab Posts: 138
    edited 2009-02-23 08:15
    A type K should work well, even though I do not believe that the ASTM calibration is 'official' at such low temperatures.

    For truly 'crazy' cold temperatures there are better thermocouples, such as the type T (based on copper/constantan) and the Au/Fe materials work well. But even better are the Silicon diodes, that show a strong change in voltage drop when a constant current is being pushed through them. They have slopes of 2 to 25 mV/Kelvin, so they are well-suited to this problem. Omega Engineering sells them (check model CY7), but they are ~$150.

    Somebody recently posted the same behaviour of a n-type transistor ...

    Cheers!
    Paul Rowntree
  • max72max72 Posts: 1,155
    edited 2009-02-24 09:15
    It really depends on the temperature you want to reach.
    A platinum thermistor can be an easy and affordable solution until liquid nitrogen (77K or -196°C) temperature, and maybe below. If you go lower you still have silicon diodes, and thermocouples type E or Chrome/Au-Fe, but they are more expensive.

    Massimo
Sign In or Register to comment.