Should/Could Prop II have Schmitt triggers on inputs ?
TreeLab
Posts: 138
I was comparing a project on the prop with a similar project on a PIC system, and it was clear that while my prop project needed an additional schmitt trigger to condition the inputs; apparently the PIC has this functionality built in.
I am not an EE : is there a fundamental reason why this conditioning is not present on the Prop, and should it be considered for PII?
Cheers!
Paul Rowntree
I am not an EE : is there a fundamental reason why this conditioning is not present on the Prop, and should it be considered for PII?
Cheers!
Paul Rowntree
Comments
-Phil
Well, you have to think about input impedance in these software implementations...
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Airspace V - international hangar flying!
www.airspace-v.com/ggadgets for tools & toys
I see that there are many aspects that I was not thinking of. While I can understand problems with contacts, I was very surprised to see hundreds to thousands of transitions on an optointerrupter.
Anyway, the schmitt chip is only pennies, and it runs on 3.3V, so it is probably not worth the tears ...
Cheers!
Paul Rowntree
-Phil
There is probably a very good reason why you might be seeing hundreds to thousands of transistions on an opto-interrupter and it probably has more to do with the resistor values to a great extent and even a poor common can give you these problems. Anyway you can easily buy optointerrupters with schmitt trigger gates. Of course it is always wise to condition flakey inputs in software anyway, it's only when it runs directly into a special bit of hardware like a counter that you need to condition the signal more in hardware.
Even though an external chip is cheap I like to avoid adding essentially redundant extras as it is just another thing that could fail. If in doubt though, put the chip on the board, it's better to blame a part than your design.
*Peter*