Shop OBEX P1 Docs P2 Docs Learn Events
propeller platform — Parallax Forums

propeller platform

copacetic353copacetic353 Posts: 52
edited 2008-11-20 21:33 in General Discussion
some of you may have seen me write in these forums before - i am fairly new.

basically, i want to make an autonomous helicopter using the propeller chip. i am following the KISS principle (keep it simple stupid) by first selecting a platform off of which to build my first autonomous robot.

i cant decide between a boat, a submarine, an offroad truck, or an airplane. i want it to be fairly complex as i know fairly well the ins and outs of coding. it is the electronics that trip me up. would someone help me out in choosing a platform? i would love to have something airborn but at this point i am very open to anything and ive grown very indecisive.

any insight, tips..... anything.... would be highly appreciated.

thank you!

Comments

  • kelvin jameskelvin james Posts: 531
    edited 2008-11-16 03:05
    You won't get much response here on that, but i can say " Sorry it ain't gonna happen ". Helicopters are very difficult to control, so the remote thing is a big problem. Although you could look at a different variation of a heli, like a quad rotor which is easier to deal with.

    www.rchelicopter.com/category/rc-helicopter-construction-design/rc-helicopter-quad-rotor-design/


    Also, getting stable control is one thing, doing the positional whereabouts in the surroundings is the expensive part. It all depends on what you want to accomplish, which you have not stated in any detail yet. Personally i would suggest something that runs on gravity first.
  • Oldbitcollector (Jeff)Oldbitcollector (Jeff) Posts: 8,091
    edited 2008-11-16 03:23
    There is a forum user here who uses the Propeller centered device
    to simplify the controls, I'm sure he'll speak up.

    Cross-posting the forums is against forum rules. Post once we'll see it. [noparse]:)[/noparse]

    Welcome to the Propeller.

    OBC

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    New to the Propeller?

    Getting started with a Propeller Protoboard?
    Check out: Introduction to the Proboard & Propeller Cookbook 1.4
    Updates to the Cookbook are now posted to: Propeller.warrantyvoid.us
    Got an SD card connected? - PropDOS
  • copacetic353copacetic353 Posts: 52
    edited 2008-11-16 03:54
    sorry! I didn't know cross posting was against the rules, it won't happen again. Thank you for the tips so far!
  • Oldbitcollector (Jeff)Oldbitcollector (Jeff) Posts: 8,091
    edited 2008-11-16 04:05
    NP, It's part of being new and learning the forums.... [noparse]:)[/noparse]

    I believe this is the product I was thinking of...

    www.helitronix.com/index.html

    OBC

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    New to the Propeller?

    Getting started with a Propeller Protoboard?
    Check out: Introduction to the Proboard & Propeller Cookbook 1.4
    Updates to the Cookbook are now posted to: Propeller.warrantyvoid.us
    Got an SD card connected? - PropDOS
  • SRLMSRLM Posts: 5,045
    edited 2008-11-16 04:26
    I'm Posting this here (the larger thread) and deleting the other post.

    Do it on the ground first. Think about it: a good helicopter (25 pound payload) will set you back $5,000 and is liable to crash if you aren't careful. A ~$500 wheeled robotics platform can get the same payload with a much higher safety margin: nothing beyond scrapes will happen if you test it in a parking lot.

    A boat would be okay too, if you have access to a large body of water and a human size boat to recover when your control fails during testing. A submarine isn't really suitable for autonomous control (at least at the hobby level) since there aren't a whole lot of sensors that you can use, and the underwater environment is so ambiguous. There are some good projects on this forum that are remote operate subs.

    If you are going for airborne, a plane would probably be a better choice than a helicopter. It's a bit more stable, cheaper, easier to control, and so on. The one part where it's more difficult is taking off and landing.
  • StefanL38StefanL38 Posts: 2,292
    edited 2008-11-16 14:11
    Hello copacetic,

    if this is your first project to do something like this. I would choose something that drives on LAND.

    If something fails with the automoous control it will be much more easy to catch some kind of a car than a boat, submarine.
    A helicopter could crash against something or just fall out of the sky. If you really want to go into the air I would construct something that
    can fall down from high altitude without much damaging. This protection will make the thing slow flying caused by its air resistance
    or you could use a model-zeppelin.

    But a car will be the easiest thing. With a boat you have some issues to protect the electronic against water and it should be save against sinking
    In a submarine you have a BIG issue about waterprotection and the testarea should be a pool. A natural lake or river won't do it.

    How about a balancing bot on two wheels ?
    A robot on two legs
    A hexabot (six legs)

    Some kind of a car on 3 or 4 wheels will be the easiest thing to develop as you can start with sensors like
    follow a light, follow a white or black line on the floor
    next thing could be to not drive against objects by using distance-sensors or tactile switches

    so what is your skill level about electronics?

    a.) isn't it that way ? plug it in where the plug fits and then it's working ? what is ohms law ? I don't know it
    a2.) I can solder electronic kits but I don't understand the schematics
    b.) I know ohms law but what the heck is a transistor or an OP-Amp?
    c.) I can use a transistor as a switch but I don't know how to bias it in an analog amplifier
    d.) I understand the basics of transistors, voltagedividers, current limiting resistors, operational amplifiers but I'm not an expert

    best regards

    Stefan
  • copacetic353copacetic353 Posts: 52
    edited 2008-11-16 16:23
    My skill level with electronics is an a2 on your scale. I am a fairly proficient programmer though.
  • Chris SavageChris Savage Parallax Engineering Posts: 14,406
    edited 2008-11-17 16:36
    Your duplicate post in the Propeller Forum has been removed. Please do not cross-post messages on the forums.

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    Chris Savage
    Parallax Engineering
  • JasonDorieJasonDorie Posts: 1,930
    edited 2008-11-20 21:33
    I'm going to disagree with Kelvin - a standard helicopter is significantly MORE stable than a quad rotor, unless the quad has a significant amount of stability software running.· If you want something that flies, you could try something like an EasyStar (look at http://tom.pycke.be/mav).· You'd be better off starting with something like a 4-wheeled platform and working your way up.

    That said, I'm trying to do more or less exactly what you are, come from a similar background, and have had reasonable success.· It's not autonomous yet, but it's no harder to fly than my R/C helis.· Have a look:·http://forums.parallax.com/showthread.php?p=757602

    Making an autonomous helicopter / plane / whatever will probably require more stuff than you think.· Most of the good ones have GPS, PIR sensors (horizon detection), accelerometers, gyros, compass, and altimeters.· It gets pricey.· [noparse]:)[/noparse]

    Jason
    ·
Sign In or Register to comment.