driving mosfets
Graham Stabler
Posts: 2,510
I was wondering if for moderate switching frequencies (say 4khz) a mosfet driver should be used between the prop and the mosfet, might be worth it anyway due to low gate drive voltage but I'm not sure. I'm switching 0.7A through the fet, as yet not selected.
Graham
Graham
Comments
1) You can use a standard (easy to get and cheaper) device rather than a low gate voltage device
2) Gate Input capacitance requires some driving. For example, you will probably find that the device gets hot if you drive the gate via a 10k resistor, and runs well with a 200 ohm gate resistor. So the driver should be able to drive 200 ohms at 10 volts for common mosfets. A small pnp transistor is good.
bongo
Leon
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Amateur radio callsign: G1HSM
Suzuki SV1000S motorcycle
Post Edited (Leon) : 6/19/2008 12:23:05 PM GMT
www.irf.com/product-info/datasheets/data/irlml2502.pdf
Tiny on resistance even with low gate drive.
But it's not convenient for general use due to the tiny package, I'll dig for something similar for through hole.
Graham
Post Edited (Graham Stabler) : 6/19/2008 3:12:08 PM GMT
Leon
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Amateur radio callsign: G1HSM
Suzuki SV1000S motorcycle
Post Edited (Leon) : 6/19/2008 2:25:24 PM GMT
·
At one time I came across an interesting MOSFET in a TO-92 package capable of driving 5 Amp loads never breaking a sweat.· I'll have to dig around, but I think it was an A16 or A76, or something.· The MOSFET had an extremely low Rds"ON" which meant that it would take quite a bit to develop enough voltage across the S/D junction to amount to any heat dissipation.· As I recall, these were logic level MOSFET's that were virtually indestructible.
·
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Beau Schwabe
IC Layout Engineer
Parallax, Inc.
This link also seems to be helpful!
Post Edited (parsko) : 6/19/2008 4:56:48 PM GMT
No, 40 mOhms is still too high... I think I remember this thing being in the single digit milli-Ohms.· I'll look this evening.
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Beau Schwabe
IC Layout Engineer
Parallax, Inc.
Did you see the other link? It looked like there were some that were in the single digit milli-ohms...
-Luke
Graham, I never thought gate drivers were all that until I tried one. I went from about 9uS rise time to something like 500nS rise time. They are definately worth it when your freq. goes up since they will spend more time in the partial-conducting state if you don't use one.
I got a few of these drivers from TI as samples. They are 9A peak and work very well. You can get them in a PDIP package for prototyping.
http://focus.ti.com/docs/prod/folders/print/ucc27322.html
My head hurt turning it clockwise like that... lol
I did not see anything in a TO-92 case, although a TO-220 isn't bad.
Point is, is that the smaller the transistor, generally the smaller the gate capacitance, and if you can get one with plenty of drive above what you actually will need, then that is a bonus.· Another important aspect that is often overlooked is the Rds "ON"... This value has gotten lower and lower over the years with improvements in silicon technology, resulting in·smaller processes.· A transistor with a 180nm gate technology, can actually handle·the same amount of·energy in 1/4 of the·area than·the 350nm technology predecessor could·... this is purely a function of IR drop across the S/D transistor junction.· From 350 to 180 you have·about a 49% reduction in·gate channel·width, and because of this, the transistor only needs to be about half as long reducing it about 50% further.· This results in a 180nm process·only needing to be about 24% the size of a 350nm process for an equal drive transistor between the two technologies.·· As an added benefit, the gate capacitance is also reduced by about 1/4 (<-in this example).
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Beau Schwabe
IC Layout Engineer
Parallax, Inc.
Post Edited (Beau Schwabe (Parallax)) : 6/19/2008 5:48:40 PM GMT
According to the following statement, one should use a driver when used with a ucontroller (or am I reading this wrong??):
Leon
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Amateur radio callsign: G1HSM
Suzuki SV1000S motorcycle
-Phil
Post Edited (Phil Pilgrim (PhiPi)) : 6/19/2008 7:59:54 PM GMT
Thanks for all the help.
Graham
The proof is to touch the MOSFET after it's been running awhile to see if it's hot. Empircism trumps theory any day! (Or, put another way, nature makes a great analog computer.)
-Phil