Is there a way to step thru the __PARAMs without naming each?

edgellmh

Is there a way to step thru the __PARAMs without naming each?

Post Edited By Moderator (Bean (Hitt Consulting)) : 5/13/2008 3:31:36 PM GMT

Bean

You mean to assign them to other variables ?

I don't know what you mean by "step through" ?

Show us an example...

Bean.

▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Did you know that 111,111,111 multiplied by 111,111,111 equals 12345678987654321 ?

www.iElectronicDesigns.com

·

Steel

Bean-· when·the SX enters a sub-routine with a parameter,·is that parameter the actual data, or just a pointer to where to find the actual data?· I think that would be the answer to his question.· If the parameter·only contains a pointer of where to find the data, then No, he can't.

I believe what he is trying to say is that he has a sub-routine with x-amount of parameters.

When you have a sub-routine that has parameters, ·In that sub-routine, you need to assign the parameters to variables in order to work with them.

I think that he is asking if·you can work directly with the parameter name instead of assigning it to another variable.

I don't know exactly how this is of benefit (Unless he is really crunched for codespace)...But I think that may be the question.

Bean

The __PARAM variables hold the actual values (not pointers).
The best way is to just assign each one.
At first I though about using "GET" or "PUT", but they use the __PARAM variables hence corupting the values.

Bean.

▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Did you know that 111,111,111 multiplied by 111,111,111 equals 12345678987654321 ?

www.iElectronicDesigns.com

·