Are you thinking Doppler? To get an accurate frequency determination, you would probably need a longer pulse than the short "pings" that are optimized for distance measurement.
No, not directly. If you find a pad to tap the return signal from, though, you might be able to hack something. But, again, I fear the pulse would be much too short to get a meaningful frequency reading.
On the Parallax web site (link below) there is a document named "BS-1 Applications Notes". In that document, on Page 53, you will find a schematic of an ultrasonic set up (transmitter and receiver) which uses the 555 timer, a couple of ultrasonic transducers, and a few other parts.
The example programs are for the BS-1 Stamp, and since you are using the BS-2 Stamp (a better and more powerful processor) the examples won't be of much use to you.
Comments
-Phil
-Phil
The BS2 interface is quite a ways away from this, though.
On the Parallax web site (link below) there is a document named "BS-1 Applications Notes". In that document, on Page 53, you will find a schematic of an ultrasonic set up (transmitter and receiver) which uses the 555 timer, a couple of ultrasonic transducers, and a few other parts.
Link to the above named document:
http://www.parallax.com/ProductInfo/Microcontrollers/BASICStampDocumentation/tabid/440/Default.aspx
The example programs are for the BS-1 Stamp, and since you are using the BS-2 Stamp (a better and more powerful processor) the examples won't be of much use to you.
I hope that's helpful.
Regards,
Bruce Bates
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔