Shop OBEX P1 Docs P2 Docs Learn Events
Did the RadioShack overunity post get deleted? — Parallax Forums

Did the RadioShack overunity post get deleted?

W9GFOW9GFO Posts: 4,010
edited 2009-09-10 10:45 in General Discussion
Sure, right when I say something philosophical - and others actually quote me for it - all evidence of such is erased.

Maybe I imagined the whole thing?

Rich H

edit: Government cover-up? Big oil execs getting worried? Conspiracy!?

▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
The Servo Boss, a 12 channel servo tester kit from Gadget Gangster.

Comments

  • sylvie369sylvie369 Posts: 1,622
    edited 2009-09-09 10:51
    Ah, but they can't erase it from the memories of those of us who quoted your wonderful post. Wait...what are you doing with that red light?

    What were we talking about?
  • rjo_rjo_ Posts: 1,825
    edited 2009-09-09 14:16
    Thank you for mentioning it...

    The only part that I was even half way serious about was the switch and measurement techniques. \

    So... here's the story. I was doodling a design and playing with some little motors and paying absolutely no attention to the forum. When I tried to measure the current through the little motor... I couldn't. The motor never completely stalled and I ended up with a current measurement that was too low... So, in situations like this... what is the standard way of measuring the current? My only alternative was to find out how much current was left ... to measure the current coming out of a second motor using the first as a generator... looking at the various RPMS and then reason my way back to a right number. OR I could have tried hooking up more series resistance... but these kinds ad hoc approaches didn't seem satisfying. There should be a direct way of measuring current that works in this situation ... I did a quick google search and didn't find anything other than what I was doing.

    The second issue was what I presumed to be static electricity being picked up by a piece of wire hooked up to a pin... a free proximity sensor. THIS phenomenon I found to be fascinating, and I think it is worth thinking and talking about. When I hooked up the sense pin to an LED... the closer my hand...the brighter the LED... just as you would expect. But then I tried to get scientific about it and measure the frequency on the sense pin... using Beau's object... I got something that was not expected:

    The frequency started out in the Hz or low kHz range when my hand was close to the wire and WENT UP to hundreds of kHz as my hand moved away just before going out of range. The actual numbers varied but the pattern was always the same.

    This frequency pattern is exactly the opposite of what I would expect. On a per packet by per packet basis... the lower the frequency... the LESS energy per packet. So getting a HIGHER frequency as you move away just makes no sense. Try it... it is really strange.

    Anyway... I came back to the forum to talk about this stuff and got deflected by another thread[noparse]:)[/noparse]

    My ill fated thread was actually an attempt at self-deprecatory humor. I do wonder how many fantastic claims have been made simply because people didn't know how to measure things or didn't know what to do when the measurements appear to make no conventional sense[noparse]:)[/noparse] But then again... I wonder about lots of stuff: exactly where is the center of the Universe?


    Rich

    Post Edited (rjo_) : 9/9/2009 2:37:17 PM GMT
  • jazzedjazzed Posts: 11,803
    edited 2009-09-09 15:21
    > I do wonder how many fantastic claims have been made simply because people didn't know how to measure things or didn't know what to do when the measurements appear to make no conventional sense[noparse]:)[/noparse]

    I guess this is how people get excited about things like Brown's Gas, etc ....

    > where is the center of the Universe?

    You are the center of the Universe (your's that is). The meaning of life is living, the meaning of death is what happens after life.

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    --Steve

    Propeller Tools
  • rjo_rjo_ Posts: 1,825
    edited 2009-09-09 16:04
    jazzed

    Then there is the problem of language...

    I have to admit that I had never heard of Brown's Gas. A quick google search produces hundreds of articles and explanations of how it works. It sounds like Brown's gas is real... but is it "free energy" any more than a chain reaction is free energy? Brown's gas consumes water. To me the term "free energy" implies producing something without consuming anything. There are people that have claimed to produce free energy motors...motors that produce more energy than they consume. That's a different kind of thinking than producing energy using a new technique. The idea of electro-chemical processes that produce energy at almost no cost isn't a problem for me. Lumping those efforts together with people who claim OU motors under the broad heading of "free energy" isn't fair or useful. My concept of free energy comes almost completely from people who claim to have over unity motors... which I just don't believe is possible[noparse]:)[/noparse]
  • jazzedjazzed Posts: 11,803
    edited 2009-09-09 16:23
    It was just an example which is related to the topic of over-unity. Whether one gets more energy out of the Brown's Gas idea than one puts in (over-unity) has not been proven with scientific rigor. The measurer and the measurements that have been produced (if any[noparse]:)[/noparse]) are certainly over-unity dubious until rigorously proved reproducible by a reputable community. Until that happens, Brown's Gas is like Snake-Oil (or wild AI vapors ... ducking tomatoes).

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    --Steve

    Propeller Tools
  • Agent420Agent420 Posts: 439
    edited 2009-09-09 16:25
    > So... here's the story.

    I'm not sure I'm following exactly what you were doing...· To measure current used, wouldn't you simply hook up a dmm in series to the motor and read the current through it using the amps/millamps setting?

    As for the frequency, I'm a bit lost understanding how you had things hooked up, but off the cuff I'd think that you've got a small rf circuit going on, and the closer your hand the more capacitance which would lower the oscillation frequency.

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
  • rjo_rjo_ Posts: 1,825
    edited 2009-09-09 16:37
    jazzed...


    There actually is an interesting problem here... it's not what I was trying to talk about... but I love the subject.

    As everyone knows... in science, the numbers are supposed to add up. In actual life, they never do.
    I don't know how I found it, but at one point I came across a review article about thermodynamics and the point of the review... in a real journal... don't remember which one... was that there has never been
    an experiment, which completely accounted for energy... not even close. The closest anyone had come was to account for about 70% of the energy in a thermodynamic system.

    The other fact that the press seems to ignore is that in science, we never actually prove anything. We try to disprove things. AND everything is based on assumptions. There was a very nice article about what the consequences of having a speed of light that changed very slowly... and the answer was that not much changes.

    I don't see any reason why gravity shouldn't decay...etc. etc.

    There is enough in science to satisfy the most doubting thomas and stimulate the most creative brain...
    we have absolutely no need for pseudoscience[noparse]:)[/noparse]

    Rich
  • Clock LoopClock Loop Posts: 2,069
    edited 2009-09-09 16:53
    sylvie369 said...
    Ah, but they can't erase it from the memories of those of us who quoted your wonderful post. Wait...what are you doing with that red light?

    What were we talking about?

    YEA, I had a great piece on patents in that thread.

    Yea, what IS that red light?

    neuralizer6ia.gif

    Who are you again? What was I talking about?

    Post Edited (Clock Loop) : 9/9/2009 4:59:59 PM GMT
  • Chris SavageChris Savage Parallax Engineering Posts: 14,406
    edited 2009-09-09 17:00
    W9GFO,

    I am not aware of any post of yours being removed. Which forum was it in?

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    Chris Savage

    Parallax Engineering
    50 72 6F 6A 65 63 74 20 53 69 74 65
    ·
  • dev/nulldev/null Posts: 381
    edited 2009-09-09 17:24
    _rjo said...
    I wonder about lots of stuff: exactly where is the center of the Universe?

    It's where my wife is at any point in spacetime.

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    Don't worry. Be happy
  • rjo_rjo_ Posts: 1,825
    edited 2009-09-09 17:55
    lol

    Beau... over in the Prop forum... but I have complete faith in the judgement of the management.
    It just didn't look quite right[noparse]:)[/noparse]

    Rich
  • rjo_rjo_ Posts: 1,825
    edited 2009-09-09 17:56
    Chris... sorry... Beau on my brain today[noparse]:)[/noparse]
  • T ChapT Chap Posts: 4,245
    edited 2009-09-09 17:57
    Obviously ruffled someone at radio shack. Even Google can't find it, but can easy find this one today by same name:

    www.google.com/search?q=radio+shack+overunity&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US[noparse]:o[/noparse]fficial&client=firefox-a
  • rjo_rjo_ Posts: 1,825
    edited 2009-09-09 18:32
    I love it...

    So... the LED gets brighter as you near the wire and the frequency goes down... that would mean the the effective pulse width is going up?

    about the current measurement on the little Shack motor... there are only so many combinations... I tried them all[noparse]:)[/noparse]

    I even bought a new meter...The numbers changed but didn't make sense(no pun intended).
  • W9GFOW9GFO Posts: 4,010
    edited 2009-09-09 19:25
    Chris Savage (Parallax) said...
    W9GFO,

    I am not aware of any post of yours being removed. Which forum was it in?

    I wasn't the originator of the thread but it was in the Propeller forum - it went way off topic.

    @rjo_, Where is the center of the surface of a sphere?

    @Paul, Years ago I photographed an Iridium flare. I often thought how cool it would be to take a group of people out on a dark night, point to an empty spot in the sky and make some corny incantation right when an Iridium flare passed over. What would they think?

    iridium.jpg

    Rich H

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    The Servo Boss, a 12 channel servo tester kit from Gadget Gangster.
  • rjo_rjo_ Posts: 1,825
    edited 2009-09-09 19:43
    So... if I take the oldest star in one direction... and then the oldest star in the other direction the line formed by the two stars is the chord of a circle... and the center would be perpendicular to those two stars...right?
  • jazzedjazzed Posts: 11,803
    edited 2009-09-09 19:55
    But you would still be infinitely wrong since your point could be on any perpendicular vector. I'm afraid you need more stars to find a parabolic focus. Then you hope all the positions you measured are not just illusions caused by gravitational warps. I really like dev/null's explanation.

    Added: Of course if the center and your two stars really make a line instead of a triangle, you would be right with some uncertainty.

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    --Steve

    Propeller Tools Post Edited (jazzed) : 9/9/2009 8:38:34 PM GMT
  • rjo_rjo_ Posts: 1,825
    edited 2009-09-09 21:06
    Todd... I don'tnow how to break this to you... but RadioShack couldn't get that stuff off the search engines if they wanted to... But I have some friends that could. As a group the guys in MI are also the funniest guys in the world[noparse]:)[/noparse]
    At one point I was an active (unofficial) contributor to the Journal of Covert Humor... stuff so funny it could start a war...
    but I had to retire from that[noparse]:)[/noparse]

    If you ever see the JoCH... that's not the right one.

    Post Edited (rjo_) : 9/9/2009 9:15:40 PM GMT
  • sylvie369sylvie369 Posts: 1,622
    edited 2009-09-09 21:28
    W9GFO said...


    @Paul, Years ago I photographed an Iridium flare. I often thought how cool it would be to take a group of people out on a dark night, point to an empty spot in the sky and make some corny incantation right when an Iridium flare passed over. What would they think?


    Rich·H
    Maybe not surprisingly, I looked to see if there were going to be any in the 15 or so minutes I expected to have my class outside watching for the Shuttle/Space Station, with exactly that intent (to pretend I was performing a feat of magic). No such luck. Maybe later in the semester. I do a few cheap magic tricks to keep the interest up.
  • dev/nulldev/null Posts: 381
    edited 2009-09-10 10:45
    The current conception is that there is no center of the universe, because space itself is expanding and distorted. If the expansion was uniform, you should end up in the middle, but because of instabilities (not yet understood) in the quark-gluon plasma it isn't. This is now measured by the comsic background radiation. If you take three independent vectors pointing radially inwards from the "surface" of the universe, you wouldn't end up in the middle. The universe isn't thought to be a sphere, but you could construct vectors simulating pointing to the center of mass of the universe. So, in the early epocs of the universe, there WAS a center, but it got dislocated. Correct me if I'm wrong.

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    Don't worry. Be happy
Sign In or Register to comment.