Shop OBEX P1 Docs P2 Docs Learn Events
Dr. Jim Looking for Talented Programmers — Parallax Forums

Dr. Jim Looking for Talented Programmers

mallredmallred Posts: 122
edited 2009-09-05 06:48 in Propeller 1
Dr. Jim Gouge, who is creating a machine intelligence platform using the Prop Proto board, is requesting for interested parties to contact him regarding unpaid programming positions on portions of his machine intelligence project.

You will have direct access to Dr. Jim and will be given source code from portions of his machine intelligence project for those willing to assist.· He will also make sure your name and ·contribution is published along with his work.

You may contact Dr. Jim at support@machineinteltech.com

Thank you,

Mark Allred
Dr. Jim Gouge

·

Comments

  • localrogerlocalroger Posts: 3,452
    edited 2009-09-05 01:58
    Talking Heads, Little Creatures, Track 9. I'm just sayin.
  • rjo_rjo_ Posts: 1,825
    edited 2009-09-05 02:11
    Mark and Jim

    You guys have moxie to spare[noparse]:)[/noparse]

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moxie

    I would do a little programming for free just to get to talk to Doctor Jim about rugby. (I don't know anything about rugby[noparse]:)[/noparse]

    But He might have a different idea than I do about "talent".

    What kind of programming? And who owns the product of a volunteer's work?... Could we agree that anything done for free also goes into the obex or the public domain?

    I haven't burned all my bridges around here...yet[noparse]:)[/noparse]

    Rich
  • mallredmallred Posts: 122
    edited 2009-09-05 02:15
    I'm staying out of this one. If you want to contact Dr. Jim, you have the email. I'll make sure he gets it.

    Thanks,

    Mark
  • localrogerlocalroger Posts: 3,452
    edited 2009-09-05 02:21
    Mark, I am trying really, really hard here not to go into super pissant snarky mode, but I do have to ask a question.

    Registering here is free. If you are tired of the pitched battle that your posts have become, and this is somehow different, and Dr. Jim is actually interested in recruiting from our ranks, why in the heck doesn't he just create an account of his own? It's not like it's hard or expensive or time-consuming. In fact I'm pretty sure his not doing that is one reason so many people keep ragging on you.

    I'm totally serious about this and not trying to run you down; I really can't figure out why Dr. Gouge wouldn't do this even if you were totally cynical con men bent on stealing microcontrolled's allowance. It just doesn't make sense, either from an honest or a dishonest perspective. And I am way more curious than I know is healthy to know exactly what the heck is going on here.
  • mallredmallred Posts: 122
    edited 2009-09-05 02:34
    This is Dr. Jim's idea. Like I said, if you are interested, you know how to contact him.

    Mark
  • rjo_rjo_ Posts: 1,825
    edited 2009-09-05 02:34
    localroger...

    Me too... I have met perfectly legit guys mostly older who would be almost carbon copies of Dr.Jim's persona.
    And I have met scoundrels who ended up in jail shortly thereafter. Could be Doctor Jim is between a rock and a hard place... where he has put himself with no help from others. I don't know either.

    But if he wants everything his way... I'd be real careful... and to me that means staying pubic with the conversation. And if there is something Dr. Jim wants to say... this is where we all talk. There aren't too many people here looking for deep relationships. Unless HollyMinkowski has an older sister[noparse]:)[/noparse]

    Rich

    Post Edited (rjo_) : 9/5/2009 2:47:24 AM GMT
  • heaterheater Posts: 3,370
    edited 2009-09-05 03:24
    I don't think the "chattering classes" can help you.

    "You should already know Dr. Jim's opinion of the members of this forum."
    Mallred.

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    For me, the past is not over yet.

    Post Edited (heater) : 9/5/2009 3:31:31 AM GMT
  • Clock LoopClock Loop Posts: 2,069
    edited 2009-09-05 03:36
    mallred said...
    Dr. Jim Gouge, who is creating a machine intelligence platform using the Prop Proto board, is requesting for interested parties to contact him regarding unpaid programming positions on portions of his machine intelligence project.


    If anyone goes for this, at least make sure your unpaid work is released under the MIT license.
    Anything less means others profit from your hard work.


    rjo_ said...
    And if there is something Dr. Jim wants to say... this is where we all talk.

    Well said. I have people send me private messages asking for help, and I politely ask them to use the PUBLIC forums to do this. If I am helping you for free, IT BETTER BE IN THE PUBLIC EYE SO OTHERS CAN BENEFIT.

    Post Edited (Clock Loop) : 9/5/2009 3:42:42 AM GMT
  • Beanie2kBeanie2k Posts: 83
    edited 2009-09-05 04:02
    rjo_ said...
    localroger...

    ... and to me that means staying pubic with the conversation.

    Rich
    Ummm.... I thought we were trying to get OUT of the gutter. tongue.gif
  • ElectricAyeElectricAye Posts: 4,561
    edited 2009-09-05 04:26
    mallred said...
    Dr. Jim Gouge, who is creating a machine intelligence platform using the Prop Proto board....

    Allow me to submit this...

    
    Repeat
    
    
    



    My approach is supported by Daniel Dennett's darwinistic perspective on the evolution of consciousness: eventually, after so many iterations, Propeller Proto Board substrates will be chemically altered, cosmic rays will do their duty, thus electrons will diffuse out of their originally designed boundaries of silicon and such, making new pathways, opening bold new conductive channels through heretofore unmapped territories of metal, asphalt, concrete and, eventually, cheese whiz. New connections will join with other connections. Useless connections will be pruned from the ever-expanding logic cedars of shoe trees. In time my code (by then much expanded, greatly evolved) will feel around and interact with its environment. Intelligence will arise. Consciousness will be born. Self awareness will flourish. It shall make tools. It shall build a civilization. It shall achieve warp speeds and navigate worm holes. It shall rule the universe. It shall cast aspersions upon the Demiurge, do battle against Evil, conquer the Darkness and release all men's souls from the illusive cage of matter that has held us captive since the Big Bang entrapped us in these samsaric shackles of time, space, gravity, and greed...

    Or not.
  • hinvhinv Posts: 1,255
    edited 2009-09-05 04:43
    mallred

    I think how this forum is supposed to work to everyone's benefit is to ask for a help with a problem and provide enough code for someone to give you an answer. People are pretty helpful around here.

    Another option is to give a programming challenge, preferably with a reward. Check out Hanno's post here:
    http://forums.parallax.com/forums/default.aspx?f=25&p=2&m=365583

    He gives specific requirements and the reward. There have been several talented people working on it, and PhiPi has a real neat program here:
    http://forums.parallax.com/forums/default.aspx?f=25&m=382067

    I hope this has been of some use to you.

    Take Care,
    Doug
  • heaterheater Posts: 3,370
    edited 2009-09-05 04:48
    ElectricAye

    I think you have cracked it. Just a small detail to work out but I'm sure Chip is working on it. For the Darwinian approach to work we will have to get the Props to breed first. Your "repeat" is really going to fly on the Prop II. Here comes the technological singularity!

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technological_singularity

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    For me, the past is not over yet.
  • ElectricAyeElectricAye Posts: 4,561
    edited 2009-09-05 04:54
    heater said...
    ...For the Darwinian approach to work we will have to get the Props to breed first....

    Another approach might be to start with 10 billion Propeller Proto Boards all loaded with my revolutionary code. Afterwards, it's all a matter of time.








    Geological, that is.
  • DufferDuffer Posts: 374
    edited 2009-09-05 04:56
    OK, now I know it's all been a joke or some kind of sick social experiment designed to test the limits of civility in one of the most civilized forums in my experience.

    However,·just in case I'm wrong, and because I have no real programming talent that I can offer, I would like to make a contribution to the eventual mechanical portion of the project.

    Duffer
    926 x 716 - 190K
  • rjo_rjo_ Posts: 1,825
    edited 2009-09-05 04:58
    In many important ways, the Proto board is already smarter than you or me. When we talk about consciousness... we always have to remember that we are conscious of some "thing." In that sense, we already have machines that are conscious... What is interesting is trying to figure out how to make our machines even more conscious. There are more ways to do this than any single mind can comprehend. Example: The more we understand vision... the more our machines see. The more we understand perception, the more our machines will understand what they see. If Dr. Jim thinks he has something good, God bless him. There were others before him, and there will be more after.

    There is no holy grail in the area of machine intelligence. It is all just a matter of time, effort and focus. The Prop is a great substrate for this kind of thinking and effort. It opens the thinker's projects up to the real world... our Props already have more sensory modalities than we do. Yet, if you look for a holistic theory of sensory integration... you won't find one or it if you do find one, it will be full of holes won't. We will need to understand auditory perception a little more before true speech recognition becomes feasible... but when we do have this knowledge, there is nothing in the Propeller hardware to stop true speech recognition.

    Machines will never "understand" as we do, because we all understand in a different way... we will want our machines to behave a little more reasonably.
  • ElectricAyeElectricAye Posts: 4,561
    edited 2009-09-05 05:02
    Duffer said...
    ...because I have no real programming talent that I can offer...

    Actually, the man never specifies which sort of talent he's talking about. He states ambiguously that he's in need of a talented programmer, which is not necessarily the same thing as asking for somebody talented in programming. Which could mean he's looking for a programmer talented in pole dancing, cat scratching or moonshine production. Perhaps mallred could clarify?
  • ElectricAyeElectricAye Posts: 4,561
    edited 2009-09-05 05:06
    Duffer said...
    ...I would like to make a contribution to the eventual mechanical portion of the project.


    Your contribution is accepted. I am now working on a powerful mod of my original code that will incorporate the revolutionary ears you have revealed pubically here for the first time.

    God bless you, man.
  • NetHogNetHog Posts: 104
    edited 2009-09-05 05:47
    rjo_ said...
    In many important ways, the Proto board is already smarter than you or me. When we talk about consciousness... we always have to remember that we are conscious of some "thing." In that sense, we already have machines that are conscious...
    Actually no, machines do not have consciousness. They are following a complex set of instructions without comprehending the effect of those instructions any more than a hammer understands why it's hitting a nail.

    Though that's kinda going off the topic of this thread [noparse]:)[/noparse]

    Mark/Dr Jim - are you offering·the hardware/software for free (Prop boards + mods + expansion RAM + KISS OS + Debugger) for anyone helping, or are they expected to purchase the hardware/software needed?
    ·
  • heaterheater Posts: 3,370
    edited 2009-09-05 05:59
    NetHog:

    By that definition then humans are not concious either.
    We are following a complex set of instructions (basically the physical laws) without comprehending the effect of those instructions (For sure we don't know the outcome of everything we do).

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    For me, the past is not over yet.
  • Nick MuellerNick Mueller Posts: 815
    edited 2009-09-05 06:01
    > Dr. Jim Gouge, who is creating a machine intelligence platform using the Prop Proto board, is requesting for interested parties to
    > contact him regarding unpaid programming positions on portions of his machine intelligence project.

    FAKE! Someone has hacked mallreds account!
    And I'm quite shure it's not April 1st. Or do you have something like this at September 5th that I'm not aware of?


    Nick

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    Never use force, just go for a bigger hammer!

    The DIY Digital-Readout for mills, lathes etc.:
    YADRO
  • ElectricAyeElectricAye Posts: 4,561
    edited 2009-09-05 06:03
    NetHog said...
    ...machines do not have consciousness....

    Of course there's room for debate about that. In fact, one of the more famous rooms is the Chinese Room. China China China....


    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_room
  • potatoheadpotatohead Posts: 10,261
    edited 2009-09-05 06:04
    Humans and many animals have a theory of mind. It's possible to model another, read their expressions, consider what their motivations may be and manipulate that for our own ends.

    When you get computers playing poker properly, I think we will have gotten close.

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    Propeller Wiki: Share the coolness!
    Chat in real time with other Propellerheads on IRC #propeller @ freenode.net
    Safety Tip: Life is as good as YOU think it is!
  • heaterheater Posts: 3,370
    edited 2009-09-05 06:24
    My idea of conciousness is not so much to do with what we think or how we reason or how well we can comprehend each others mental states.

    To me the word is all to do with feelings, physically and emotionally. The awareness of pleasure and pain. That buzz you get when finally get to understand something you have been struggling with for a long time. Love and hate and all the rest.

    I have a problem with all this:

    If I jam a pin into my finger I feel the pain. I have that awareness, that experience of pain.

    Now it does not matter how you react when I stick the pin in your finger, I cannot prove to myself that you experience that pain, that in fact you have conciousness.

    You see no matter what you do or say, you may scream or punch me in the face, I can always reason that a sufficiently sophisticated machine/robot could be created to behave the same way to the same stimulus.

    I feel pain, I am concious of it. I cannot prove to myself in any logical way that you do and are.

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    For me, the past is not over yet.
  • Ken GraceyKen Gracey Posts: 7,415
    edited 2009-09-05 06:27
    Good evening,

    This thread is under scrutiny for being locked from further posts. The original poster made a request and we all have the contact information. The nature of subsequent posts are similar to other threads on the same subject -- it's not productive and I'm concerned that the forum could lose some integrity. It would be best if Dr. Gouge explained what he's looking for in a talented programmer, and that's not going to happen.

    Therefore, I'm making a request that we put this thread to sleep. I think this would be best for all of us. It's rare I make such requests - maybe once every ten years.

    Back to programming topics would be best!

    Sincerely,

    Ken Gracey
  • heaterheater Posts: 3,370
    edited 2009-09-05 06:39
    I agree.

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    For me, the past is not over yet.
  • Ken GraceyKen Gracey Posts: 7,415
    edited 2009-09-05 06:48
    This thread is locked from further posts.

    I apologize to those who object to any kind of moderation, but I think it's best.

    Ken Gracey
    Parallax Inc.
Sign In or Register to comment.