Diptrace Version 2.0 (2009)

As part of my annual PCB software review I got the following response from Diptrace.
=======================================================================================
from Alex Mihailenko <asupport@xxx>
reply-to support@xxxx
to robert.l.lawrence@xxxxxxx
date Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 7:59 AM
subject Re: Diptrace current development
Dear Bob,
Yes, DipTrace is still in development. We are working up new version 2.0 with some sizeable features and a lot of minor improvements.
--
With kind regards
Alex Mihailenko
DipTrace Team
www.diptrace.com/
=============================================================
Older post with 3 design files attached (from mynet43, Jim)
Surface Mt.eli -- contains the 'component' layout for both the M44 and Q44 surface mount chips.
Surface Mt.lib -- contains the 'pattern' layout for the M44 chip.
p8x32a-q44.lib -- contains the 'pattern' layout for the Q44 chip.
http://forums.parallax.com/showthread.php?p=716352
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Aka: CosmicBob
=======================================================================================
from Alex Mihailenko <asupport@xxx>
reply-to support@xxxx
to robert.l.lawrence@xxxxxxx
date Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 7:59 AM
subject Re: Diptrace current development
Dear Bob,
Yes, DipTrace is still in development. We are working up new version 2.0 with some sizeable features and a lot of minor improvements.
--
With kind regards
Alex Mihailenko
DipTrace Team
www.diptrace.com/
=============================================================
Older post with 3 design files attached (from mynet43, Jim)
Surface Mt.eli -- contains the 'component' layout for both the M44 and Q44 surface mount chips.
Surface Mt.lib -- contains the 'pattern' layout for the M44 chip.
p8x32a-q44.lib -- contains the 'pattern' layout for the Q44 chip.
http://forums.parallax.com/showthread.php?p=716352
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Aka: CosmicBob
Comments
Dan
Really.
·
Sorry, just thought about that joke. I'm now considering standup.
I’d recently moved away from Eagle to EasyCAD for all the reasons listed above and then some. I was tired of software that kept saying “Herr Domkoff, our vay you vill do it or not at all” and “Ze icon picture is not meant to show you what it does”. (By the way, it is quite dangerous criticising Eagle IN ANY WAY on this forum. Remember though that our goal is to build circuits, not become members of some secret sect worshiping some ancient god or antiquated software)
EasyCAD is in a completely different league to Eagle but Diptrace looks like an even better alternative, Thanks
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Can some knowledgeable person with wide experience post a comparison of various PCB layout software, based on features, ease of use, portability among PCB services, reliability, cost, etc.? It would be most useful to me, and perhaps to others, if based on actual information rather than on brand loyalties. Perhaps it ought to be a new thread. Thanks in advance.
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
· -- Carl, nn5i@arrl.net
There are some threads here in the sandbox that go over some of the details of layout software. The consensus I took from it was that Eagle has a steeper learning curve but has better libraries. Diptrace is easy to use but doesn't have the extensive library support.
(1) I can't rotate a component except in multiples of 90 degrees. Sometimes I'd like to be able to rotate something, say, 45 degrees, or 30 degrees, in order to minimize lead inductance or for other reasons, perhaps (as now) because I'm building something that will feed six antennas arranged in a hexagon.
(2) ExpressPCB cannot automatically check a layout against the corresponding schematic. By clicking on a pin, it can highlight each other pin that should be connected to the one clicked, which is very helpful -- but I must check visually to see if they're actually connected and that no other pin is accidentally connected.
(3) ExpressPCB apparently cannot produce files (Gerber, for example) that are portable to other vendors. If I design under ExpresPCB, apparently I'm locked into that one vendor to fabricate the actual boards. That's not a major problem as I am happy with that vendor, but if they go out of business I'll be in deep yogurt.
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
· -- Carl, nn5i@arrl.net
Diptrace will do the things you described above.
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
· -- Carl, nn5i@arrl.net
I converted to it over a year ago. I've done quite a few boards and never had a problem.
The Gerber files seem to work with any board house I've tried.
Like most other layout programs, don't bother with the autoroute. It works but causes problems when you need different trace widths, etc.
It's easy to make your own parts if you need them.
Have fun.
One thing though. I cant seem to update the board file if I make a change in the schematic. i tried backannotate and looked in the help but I can't seem to update the existing board.
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Think Inside the box first and if that doesn't work..
Re-arrange what's inside the box then...
Think outside the BOX!
There are three things you can do to solve this with DipTrace:
1. Under the Verification Menu, select "Compare to Schematic".
2. Under the File Menu, select "Renew Design from Schematic"
3. From 2., choose either "By Components" or "By RefDes".
I've used these quite often and they seem to work fine.
I hope this helps.
Jim
thank's
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Think Inside the box first and if that doesn't work..
Re-arrange what's inside the box then...
Think outside the BOX!
Starting from version 2.0.06 DipTrace offers new edition Non-Profit Lite, which is freeware for non-profit use and has the same limitation as Lite Edition (500 pins, 2 layers, $145 value). You can ask diptrace support and get registration key for this edition. There is no info about this on official web-site though.
Regards