Propeller I semiconductor process technology? Is it 350nm or 180nm?

[cde]

Hi,

According to wikipedia, it's 180nm:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/180_nanometer

But I think they may be referring to the Prop 2, as Beau said Prop 1 die photo is 350nm:

http://forums.parallax.com/archive/i...p/t-97773.html

In addition, 350nm only needs 3.3v whereas 180nm requires 1.8v, so this is consistent.

By the way, are all 3.3v chips made on a 350nm process? Or do they have some kind of voltage regulator inside?

[Ale]

According to some earlier post by Beau or Chip it is 350 nm. The prop II will be 180 nm if I'm not mistaken. I do not think that all 350nm devices are 3.3V and some uC have a regulator inside (AVR32 for instance) but I do not know which process they are made on. What exactly do you want to know ? or Why do you ask this ?

[cde]

According to some earlier post by Beau or Chip it is 350 nm. The prop II will be 180 nm if I'm not mistaken. I do not think that all 350nm devices are 3.3V and some uC have a regulator inside (AVR32 for instance) but I do not know which process they are made on. What exactly do you want to know ? or Why do you ask this ?

Out of sheer curiosity.

[Beau Schwabe (Parallax)]

Hi,

The Prop I uses a 350nm technology, where as the Prop II will have 180nm technology.

There is no on-board-silicon regulator for the Propeller II design.

The process usually defines the maximum operating 'core' voltage but with proper design this can
vary widely.