 |
|
 |
| Parallax Forums > Public Forums > BASIC Stamp > Monitoring AC motors | Forum Quick Jump
|
|  Randy Registered Member
        Date Joined Jun 2005 Total Posts : 80 | Posted 12/30/2006 1:59 PM (GMT -8) |   | | I have several three speed 120 volt motors in FCUs (heating and/or cooling units) that I would like to monitor with a Stamp. I would like to know which speed they are on and if they are indeed running. A selecter switch determines what leads are feed 120 volts. I figure I could simply check for voltage on the three lines to determine what if any speed was selected, allthough I do have some questions about how to do that safely and not have gliches due to an AC wave form. The mystery to me is how to verify that they are running and not open or frozen.
First on the list is of course it must be inexpensive. Depending on the outcome of this experiment I could be looking at several hundred motors.
I don't know if I could monitor current cheaply but if so there are a number of issues that might this impractical.
While they are all similar there are at least ten different models of motors with slight speed differences and current draw. They are impedance protected so if they are stuck they will not pop a breaker but simply get warm, I don't know what the current draw is if frozen and I would guess it varies with the selected speed. The load each motor drives is not the same as the blower wheels vary in size not to mention dirty filters and duct length.
Air flow will also not be consistant and many units have two motors into a common duct.
An optical disk on the shaft would be labor intensive - not cheap.
Anyway so much for why I can't come up with a solution. Any ideas how to do this?
Randy
| | Back to Top | | |
   |  Randy Registered Member
        Date Joined Jun 2005 Total Posts : 80 | Posted 12/31/2006 12:22 PM (GMT -8) |   | Thanks Tom and John
Cheap, cheap and cheap! The boss man is bugged by a dozen units and will spend maybe five hundred dollars to see what is going on with them. In the same breath he said if he likes the results he might want to do three hundred plus of them. That will never happen as I know the funds would not get approved for even a thousand dollars. I need to apply the post holiday stress question and see if he is serious.
My previous Stamp based solutions have been limited to a single Stamp. While I though of the cost and quantity of the other components I didn't give thought to the number of Stamps and the cost of them. I will look at SX if this is going to expand to numerous units. The programing scares me as I have trouble enough with PBASIC.
That said I still wish to pursue how to do this. I am wondering about using a vibration sensor on the fan housing to detect operation. All I need is a simple yes it is running or no it is not. By monitoring the selecter switch I will know what speed was selected, beyond that I only care that the motor has not failed. I have never used a vibration sensor before and don't have any idea if it would work. Thoughts?
Randy | | Back to Top | | |
   |  PhilTheMotorman Registered Member
        Date Joined Dec 2006 Total Posts : 1 | Posted 12/31/2006 5:47 PM (GMT -8) |   | |
Randy,
I'm not able to give any solutions on the high tech side of your questions, but I know the low tech. The normal method to monitor if a blower is operating is with a pressure differential switch or a sail switch. If you monitor the voltage at each speed control lead of the motors and use the switches I have mentioned you should satisfy the requirements you have listed. If you are using an alarm circuit, make sure you use both the voltage to the motor (on) and the pressure or sail switch (off) and make it a manual reset. Your motors are impedence protected, but have an in-line/automatic reset/ thermal protector. These motors will overload, trip out, cool down, reset, and cycle like this untill the overload finally fatigues and opens permanently. You may not detect a developing problem if your alarm is not a manual reset.
I am no engineer, just guy who works on motors and blowers every day.
Hope this helps,
Phil
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  Randy Registered Member
        Date Joined Jun 2005 Total Posts : 80 | Posted 1/1/2007 9:36 AM (GMT -8) |   | Thanks to all of you for the replies and ideas. I am getting a good feel for what to do and of course I have thought of some other restrictions. Mostly how to get this info to a host pc. Many of these FCUs are a hundred plus feet and two to four stories away. I will need to do some multiplexing at the least to keep cabeling simple. There will probably be no alarm just a periodic monitoring.
Anyway first I need to see if they are serious about wanting me to pursue this in light of costs. I will be out of the country untill February so I will have some time to tie my brain in knots while simplifying the vision of how to do this. At this point even if they axe the project I want to figure out how to make this work so if nothing else I will put together at least one from my pocket just to know I can. It is no wonder I have money! But I got lots of toys.
It will be a month or two but I will post again when I have a working solution or most likely a question regarding communicating the data to a pc.
Randy | | Back to Top | | |
 |  Mike Green Registered Member

       Date Joined Oct 2004 Total Posts : 13558 | Posted 1/1/2007 10:27 AM (GMT -8) |   | | In terms of sensing whether there's power applied to a winding, a simple solution is to use an optoisolator and series resistor (to drop the AC to 1.7V at 10ma). The output of the optoisolator is just a transistor and could connect to a Stamp or directly to a twisted pair with a 20ma current source at the other end. You'll get 60Hz current pulses at the other end which you can detect with a Stamp. If you need to multiplex all these sensors, you should consider having a Stamp at the motor end of things. It could be powered locally (from the motor supply) or fed power over the cable from beyond. You could use RS422/RS485 drivers for the serial connection for reliability over that kind of distance. Basically, the Stamp would send some kind of unique character (like "!") at the beginning of the message, then a series of bytes with a bit for each sensor followed by the one's complement of each byte (for checking) and maybe even a checksum at the end. These would be send continuously. The monitoring Stamp or PC would discard any messages that failed to check properly. If too many errors occur or no messages are received within some time period, the monitoring Stamp or PC could signal a communications failure. | | Back to Top | | |
| Forum Information | Currently it is Saturday, November 21, 2009 11:34 AM (GMT -8) There are a total of 393,858 posts in 55,536 threads. In the last 3 days there were 84 new threads and 709 reply posts. View Active Threads
| | Who's Online | This forum has 17692 registered members. Please welcome our newest member, old guy. 58 Guest(s), 14 Registered Member(s) are currently online. Details Siri, keith_kw, Jay Kickliter, Mike Green, Bob Lawrence (VE1RLL), Alsowolfman, Dogg, dMajo, hover1, ErNa, Harley, Tubular, Leon, MicroDirk |
Forum powered by dotNetBB v2.42EC SP2.02 dotNetBB © 2000-2009 |
|
|