 |
|
 |
| Parallax Forums > Public Forums > Propeller Chip > Extreme cold operations | Forum Quick Jump
|
 |  Tracy Allen Registered Member

       Date Joined Jul 2004 Total Posts : 2847 | Posted 3/10/2009 8:21 PM (GMT -8) |   | The Citizen CMR309T5.000MABJ (Digikey has stock) is rated for operation from -40 to +85, and while it is ostensibly also surface mount, it is a cylindrical package with wire leads that are simply bent out to sit on SMT pads. So you could conceivably bend those down into holes.
I don't understand however, why basically the same package can have two different operating temperature ranges. For example, the HCM49 is rated for -40 degrees in surface mount, but the same package in through hole, the HC49, is rated only to -20 degrees. AFAIK, the surface mount HCM49 is made by bending out the wire leads of the HC49 along a pad a the bottom, so they come out at the ends for attachment to SMT pads. Otherwise the same crystal, same can. Maybe it has to do with better control over the stresses of mounting. Huh? Tracy Allen www.emesystems.com | | Back to Top | | |
 |  SRLM Registered Member

       Date Joined Jul 2008 Total Posts : 2720 | Posted 3/10/2009 9:25 PM (GMT -8) |   | | You could probably just use a regular crystal with a small heater and temperature sensor. That way, it will keep the crystal temperature constant (PID loop in a prop cog), giving you better timekeeping accuracy. It shouldn't be too difficult to surround the crystal with a couple of heating elements, the temperature sensor, and some thermally conductive epoxy. | | Back to Top | | |
 |  Jay Kickliter Registered Member

       Date Joined Aug 2008 Total Posts : 242 | Posted 3/11/2009 7:07 AM (GMT -8) |   | | Aren't those temperature ratings at sea level? At the altitude you'd be using these components, would they even loose heat fast enough to be a concern? I've been wondering about this for a while. On your past flights, did you ever take board level temperature measurments? | | Back to Top | | |
 |  Earl Foster Registered Member

       Date Joined Nov 2004 Total Posts : 171 | Posted 3/11/2009 7:28 AM (GMT -8) |   | I found it interesting that the HCM49 in surface mount is rated lower then the non-SMD version as well. I would agree with you and say it is because of the leads /no leads can package. I imagine that the 2pF will not have an impact on the performance and it is standard for SMD due to the lack of leads.
Using temperature controlled heaters is a good idea but since the crystal is the only component I am having a problem with I would prefer to stay away from that solution right now.
Failure due to under rated components is a major concern. For my normal payloads I do not worry about the rated temperatures since I know my housing will stay warm during the 4 hour mission and I record temperature, however, this is not a normal or amateur mission. The prop will be controlling balloon float at altitude, along with other critical functions for a period of days. The temperature at 110,000 is -55C so the payload will get cold soaked over time.
WWW.HAPB.NET
"Don't ask yourself what the world needs - ask yourself what makes you come alive, and then go do it." - H.T.Whitman Post Edited (Earl Foster) : 3/11/2009 3:45:01 PM GMT | | Back to Top | | |
  |  Tracy Allen Registered Member

       Date Joined Jul 2004 Total Posts : 2847 | Posted 3/11/2009 8:18 AM (GMT -8) |   | Jay, I don't think the temperature ratings have to do with altitude or pressure, but more with frequency drift. The graph here from Citizen shows the temperature effect on an AT cut crystal from -80 to +120 degrees Celsius. http://www.citizen.co.jp/english/crystal/aspect/index.html The spec sheets say that their crystals (in certain SMT packages) will stay within 50ppm of the calibration frequency over a range of -10 to +60 C, but the operating temperature range is -40 to +85, and storage from -55 to +125. When I first got a Propeller, I stuck it in an environmental chamber and had it operating down to -65 degrees C using the standard HC49 crystal. Another thing, I don't ever recall seeing a graph of crystal impedance versus temperature, in terms of Q factor that would need to be accounted for in the oscillation circuit. It may not be a factor.
Maybe there is some limitation due to the packaging. In a project for a deep ocean probe that used one of our data loggers, they insisted that we take out the resistance welded metal resonator package and use an epoxy package instead, due to the high pressures that would be encountered.
Earl, the 18pF vs 20pF shouldn't make a significant difference. Tracy Allen www.emesystems.com | | Back to Top | | |
   |  Phil Pilgrim (PhiPi) Registered Member

       Date Joined Feb 2006 Total Posts : 6000 | Posted 3/11/2009 1:15 PM (GMT -8) |   | You do have to mind the temperature coefficient issues at low temperatures, though. Packages with compliant pins (e.g. SOIC) are not a problem, since the pins can flex when the package expands/contracts differentially with the PCB. But packages with no pins (i.e. just pads on the bottom) could be a problem under those conditions, since solder joints could crack. This is exacerbated at low temps by the fact that, under reflow conditions, the solder solidified when package and board were both hot.
I honestly don't know whether the tempcos between crystals/oscillators and fiberglass PCB materials are different enough to be an issue, though. Maybe they're not.
-Phil | | Back to Top | | |
     |  Jetfire Registered Member
        Date Joined Dec 2008 Total Posts : 34 | Posted 3/12/2009 11:41 AM (GMT -8) |   | | | |
 | Forum Information | Currently it is Saturday, November 21, 2009 11:43 AM (GMT -8) There are a total of 393,863 posts in 55,536 threads. In the last 3 days there were 84 new threads and 713 reply posts. View Active Threads
| | Who's Online | This forum has 17693 registered members. Please welcome our newest member, Fosco. 78 Guest(s), 9 Registered Member(s) are currently online. Details Mike Green, Jim Fouch, JRetSapDoog, Dogg, hover1, Harley, Sapieha, Electronegativity, Tubular |
Forum powered by dotNetBB v2.42EC SP2.02 dotNetBB © 2000-2009 |
|
|