Shop OBEX P1 Docs P2 Docs Learn Events
Changing DE0-Nano P1 clock — Parallax Forums

Changing DE0-Nano P1 clock

escherescher Posts: 138
edited 2018-01-27 06:47 in Propeller 1
I want to use 104 MHz as my P1 base clock ( @Heater. and @Cluso99 and others have extolled its stability) as my VGA display routine needs those sweet sweet nanoseconds.

I see in the top file for the DE0-Nano P1 the following declaration:
pll	: altpll with (
		pll_type = "enhanced",
		operation_mode = "normal",
		inclk0_input_frequency = 20000,		-- 20000ps = 50	MHz
		clk0_multiply_by = 16,
		clk0_divide_by = 5);

This is allegedly supposed to result in providing a 5 MHz input clock signal to the P1... but I don't see how as (50 MHz * 16)/5 = 160 MHz. So I'm stuck on even starting to figure out how to change these or other parameters to provide the propeller with a 6.5 MHz input clock signal (which with the 16x PLL would give me 104 MHz).

Anyone have experience with this? Thank you!

Comments

  • ozpropdevozpropdev Posts: 2,791
    edited 2018-01-27 07:13
    104 Mhz doesn't divide nicely with a 50MHz clock.
    You could try these PLL mul/div values though to boost performance.
     * 16 / 4  = 100000000
     * 21 / 5  = 105000000
     * 17 / 4  = 106250000
    

    Edit: Actually Quartus allowed a multiply of 104 and a divide by 25 to generate 208 Mhz.
    A test using _clkfreq = 104000000 and fullduplexserial @ 1Mbaud worked fine on a nano build.
  • Cluso99Cluso99 Posts: 18,069
    It's not tested on P1V so you will need to do a thorough test on everything. The timing verification doesn't work on P1V and Quartus, so there is no proper way to verify the timing. So you will need to not only need to test all instructions, but also all the I/O timings too.
  • Cluso99 wrote: »
    It's not tested on P1V so you will need to do a thorough test on everything.
    ?????
    This is based on a REAL P1V build for the DE0-Nano board.
    I have run various code snippets on the board and at this point have found no issues.
    In my experience with FPGA's, it's a lottery anyway.


  • Cluso99Cluso99 Posts: 18,069
    ozpropdev wrote: »
    Cluso99 wrote: »
    It's not tested on P1V so you will need to do a thorough test on everything.
    ?????
    This is based on a REAL P1V build for the DE0-Nano board.
    I have run various code snippets on the board and at this point have found no issues.
    In my experience with FPGA's, it's a lottery anyway.

    I presume you tested all the software at 104MHz?

    I ran thru a lot of testing back in the days on the real P1, including 108MHz, as did a number of others. Saphieha did a lot of testing at 115MHz.

    I wasn't aware any testing on P1V had been done above 80MHz. However, each FPGA compilation really needs the timing examined, and the verilog code just doesn't do it. Heck, we cannot even get a clean compile without Warnings.
  • Great thanks @ozpropdev!
    ozpropdev wrote: »
    fullduplexserial @ 1Mbaud

    What and where are these settings? I'm unfamiliar with them.
  • escherescher Posts: 138
    edited 2018-01-27 20:10
    The modification to the multiplier and divider worked!

    Getting crisp 640x480 @ 60 Hz video w/ a 104 MHz base clock:

    Code here if interested

    4tcSIEI.jpg
  • Nice going. I was going to say producing video is a good test because your eye picks up any small 'glitches' related to timing or dud compiles.

    If you get a chance, push the clock frequency up until you start seeing issues, probably around 120 MHz

  • Cluso99Cluso99 Posts: 18,069
    escher wrote: »
    The modification to the multiplier and divider worked!

    Getting crisp 640x480 @ 60 Hz video w/ a 104 MHz base clock:

    Code here if interested

    4tcSIEI.jpg
    Nice work!
Sign In or Register to comment.