Shop OBEX P1 Docs P2 Docs Learn Events
P2 Frequency / Temperature Logging — Parallax Forums

P2 Frequency / Temperature Logging

VonSzarvasVonSzarvas Posts: 3,278
edited 2021-04-16 12:07 in Propeller 2

Hi everyone !

Here's some initial data of temperature rise of the P2 Edge module whilst being run at various frequencies and current loads. (Data collection is in-progress, and I'll update the spreadsheet with more variants soon!))

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1diJEpmfaivDfvua6Xn7UwfrTO1AYVBwkP2GloVyOAbs

Photos of the setup and the code being used : https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1aC1diOju06bQN6bOJ_SOmivMhPc1xtKr

Briefly though...

  • Temperature controlled oven with P2 Edge as the DUT.
  • Eight thermocouples (3 each side of the Edge module, 1 inside oven temp, 1 outside oven temp),
  • Inline high side current monitoring of the 5V supply, between the bench supply and DUT
  • Vout monitoring of VIO24
  • Two frequency logs (clkfreq/100 and DAC toggle on pin 48 for some tests- else it will show as zero)

Edit: Test code file attached (power_check4.spin2)

Comments

  • Nice start. It'd be good to capture RCslow and RCfast at different temperatures too, if possible. My recollection is that RCslow varied a fair bit, but RCfast was stable across temperatures.

  • evanhevanh Posts: 15,187

    300 MHz 700 mA 105C PASS

    That one is impressive partly because the voltage regulator stood up. But the Prop2 performance might just be too good. Are you monitoring a toggle frequency to know the PLL frequency is maintained?

  • evanhevanh Posts: 15,187

    And what temperatures is the Edge Board reaching? Is there a probe with good thermal contact to the ground plane/exposed pad?

  • VonSzarvasVonSzarvas Posts: 3,278
    edited 2021-04-16 08:03

    @evanh said:
    And what temperatures is the Edge Board reaching? Is there a probe with good thermal contact to the ground plane/exposed pad?

    Yes, thermocouple #6 is right in the middle of the P2, on the back.

    Thermocouples (Degrees C) #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8
    1. Switcher inductor
    2. P2 chip top (top-left)
    3. P2 chip top (bottom-right)
    4. Oven ambient
    5. pcb back - P2 Edge logo
    6. pcb back of P2 chip
    7. pcb back of switcher
    8. room temp

    The frequency log is column S, captured from an output on pin 57

  • evanhevanh Posts: 15,187

    OHHHH! Lol, I was only looking at the Index page ....

  • @evanh said:
    OHHHH! Lol, I was only looking at the Index page ....

    Gazeepers! Lot's more fun beyond the index !! :)

  • evanhevanh Posts: 15,187

    Okay, something about the test isn't working right. Here's test 28 where the measurements transition from 775 mA to lower 68 mA current. Some sort of lockup occuring I presume.

    107.1   116     113.3   104     106.3   116.2   109.2   14.1    0   0   0   775 0   0   3320    4846    0   3200092.355
    107.2   116.1   113.3   103.4   106.3   116     109.3   14.2    0   0   0   68  0   0   3309    4964    0   244870.6541
    

    116C heatsink temperature isn't near high enough for that power level. The 300 MHz tests are 20C higher, at 130C, for the same 700-800 mA and even the 300 MHz tests are suspect, imho.

    I have real doubt of the validity of the frequency readings. I don't believe 300 MHz is possible above 100C let alone 320 MHz.

  • @evanh said:
    Okay, something about the test isn't working right. Here's test 28 where the measurements transition from 775 mA to lower 68 mA current. Some sort of lockup occuring I presume.

    that's test 27, which failed.

  • evanhevanh Posts: 15,187
    edited 2021-04-16 09:58

    Oops, yep, 27. I was looking at 28 at same time. And I'll start eats me words on the temperature curve too. Just doing the testing myself now (Which I could have done years ago!) and the PLL allows over 340 MHz at 100 °C die temperature. Way higher frequency than I expected.

    And the PLL slope is something around -0.75 MHz/°C. Although it's not exactly linear.

    EDIT: It's looking like the PLL self-limiting is proving not to be 100% protective though. That'll be why you're getting crashes.

    EDIT2: Here's my measured points for die temperature vs PLL settling frequency:

        MHz degC
    ========================
        330 122
        340 106
        350 92
        360 78
        370 65
        380 53
        390 41
    

    So, if one was to ensure a die temperature of 25 °C then 400 MHz should be possible. Although lower would be advised so as to stay away from the crash prone range. And of course if doing a lot pf processing then a lot more leeway is needed for the temperature gradient between cooling and junction.

  • Cluso99Cluso99 Posts: 18,069

    @evanh said:
    Oops, yep, 27. I was looking at 28 at same time. And I'll start eats me words on the temperature curve too. Just doing the testing myself now (Which I could have done years ago!) and the PLL allows over 340 MHz at 100 °C die temperature. Way higher frequency than I expected.

    And the PLL slope is something around -0.75 MHz/°C. Although it's not exactly linear.

    EDIT: It's looking like the PLL self-limiting is proving not to be 100% protective though. That'll be why you're getting crashes.

    EDIT2: Here's my measured points for die temperature vs PLL settling frequency:

      MHz degC
    ========================
      330 122
      340 106
      350 92
      360 78
      370 65
      380 53
      390 41
    

    So, if one was to ensure a die temperature of 25 °C then 400 MHz should be possible. Although lower would be advised so as to stay away from the crash prone range. And of course if doing a lot pf processing then a lot more leeway is needed for the temperature gradient between cooling and junction.

    On a sample size of ???

  • evanhevanh Posts: 15,187
    edited 2021-04-16 10:11

    It's all rough numbers Cluso. If you want to be cautious then you'd never even get close to those numbers.

  • @Cluso99 said:
    On a sample size of ???

    Also to share that my tests are sample size of 1 whilst we figure out the sweet spots and trends.
    After that we can reduce the number of tests to some specific settings (perhaps 2 or 3 variants) and repeat them across multiple devices.

  • evanhevanh Posts: 15,187
    edited 2021-04-16 11:39

    Von,
    Have you got any idea on calculating, in say test #29, what the temperature difference might be between the ground plane on the back of the Edge to the die junction temperature?

    Whole board power is 3 Watts. You've got 124 °C for the ground plane. I guesstimate the PLL starts limiting the 320 MHz at around 138 °C, maybe 140. So junction temperature must be below that. And to not have crashes needs some buffer range below too.

  • TJa for the P2 package is 18.2 C/W

    One thing we don't know is the real power into the P2 chip- The LDOs won't be taking much of the share but I figure we could get closer to reality by removing that switcher (and feeding in a monitored 1.8V to the P2). And we also ensure the switcher is not hitting a thermal limit and shutting the P2 down.
    I'm modding an Edge now and will start baking shortly!

  • evanhevanh Posts: 15,187

    @VonSzarvas said:
    TJa for the P2 package is 18.2 C/W

    Hmm, that's too large. That'll be without any heat sink attached. The more useful figure would be junction to exposed pad.

    I'm modding an Edge now and will start baking shortly!

    The Eval Board has a removable jumper just for that.

  • Yeah, that's the package only. It's based on being mounted on a certain amount of copper which the Edge just about matches, so that reason (and for consistency at this point) is why the Edge is next in the oven!
    EVAL should run cooler to some extent (or at least the curve will be less steep). Eventually in a closed box everything just gets toasty!

    I've updated the first post with a link to some photos of the test setup. A pair of digital heat guns controlled by P2 Edge / JonnyMac combo. The oven is just a convenient heat insulated box (ahem, to some degree). The oven is unplugged and relies on the heat guns heating function.
    The tray with all the articulated arms allows us to set up the DUT outside the oven. All the thermocouples are "rammed" into the DUT with a dolop of https://www.qoltec.com/product/qoltec-thermal-grease-515-wm-k-1g-grey
    (Thermal conductivity : 5.15W/mK, Thermal resistance : max. 0.004°C/W)

  • evanhevanh Posts: 15,187

    Thanks, I'll check back in after work. I'm way late for bed now. :)

  • Hi VonSzarvas

    Out of curiosity; can you tell what's the kind of 20.000 MHz crystal (or clock oscillator) (mfg, type, etc) is assembled at the P2-EDGE(s) you are using during the tests?

    Are there any specific temperature probe "tacked" to its (their) package(s)?

  • evanhevanh Posts: 15,187

    @Yanomani said:
    Out of curiosity; can you tell what's the kind of 20.000 MHz crystal (or clock oscillator) (mfg, type, etc) is assembled at the P2-EDGE(s) you are using during the tests?

    BOM for Edge revA says: Epson TSX-3225 20.0000MF20G-AC3

  • YanomaniYanomani Posts: 1,524
    edited 2021-04-18 02:26

    Thanks evanh!

    I was aware of the BOM, but was having some difficulty in finding the exact model.

    Epson Europe just gave a helping hand, and now I have some links, but still not sure of the matching part, because there's more than one (BOM's spec'd CL of 9 pF did helped in restricting the search. Now I have just four, differing mainly in Temperature Range Frequency Stability over Temperature, just the data I was looking for). :smile:

    Here are the ones I found:

  • evanhevanh Posts: 15,187
    edited 2021-04-18 02:43

    @evanh said:
    ... Just doing the testing myself now (Which I could have done years ago!) and the PLL allows over 340 MHz at 100 °C die temperature. Way higher frequency than I expected.

    Turns out I had done this years ago in fact. But it was only for the revA silicon. And it produced an interesting outcome too:

    RevA measured PLL settling frequency as a function of
    temperature and post-VCO divider (XDIVP)
    ===============================================
    VCO freq| Temperatures (°C) at XDIVP dividers
     (MHz)  |   /1     /2     /4    /10    /20
    --------+--------------------------------------
      430   |                 -7     -3     -2
      420   |          -1      4      9     10
      410   |          11     16     20     21
      400   |    x     23     29     32     34
      390   |    *     36     41     45     46
      380   |   39     49     55     58     60
      370   |   53     64     69     74     76
      360   |   67     79     84     88     89
      350   |   83     94
    
     x = Cog crashed outright at inital -8 °C
     * = Cog crashed at 23 °C (PLL held lock)
    ===============================================
    

    That testing was bit-bashing a pin for measuring the frequency. If I'd used a smartpin it may have faired better with /1 mode.

    The interesting part is there is notable shift in the measured temperatures vs frequencies as the XDIVP divider is increased.

  • evanhevanh Posts: 15,187
    edited 2021-04-18 04:26

    Ha, and idling all the cogs, instead of leaving them stopped, has an improved impact too.

            rep #1, #0
            waitx   #500
    

    EDIT: Here's my up-to-date source.

    con
        XTALFREQ    = 20_000_000                'PLL stage 0: crystal frequency
        XDIV        = 2                 'PLL stage 1: crystal divider (1..64)
        XMUL        = 45                    'PLL stage 2: crystal / div * mul (1..1024)
        XDIVP       = 20                    'PLL stage 3: crystal / div * mul / divp (1,2,4,6..30)
    
        TPIN    = 9
    
    
    dat     org
    
    'put other cogs into a sleepy state
            hubset  #$f0            'safe RCFAST
            mov pa, #7
    .loop
            coginit pa, #@pause
            djnz    pa, #.loop
    
            waitx   ##1000          'wait for other cogs to bed down
    
    'Set frequency ( sysclock/1000 ) output at smartpin TPIN
            dirl    #TPIN
            wrpin   #SPM_NCO_FREQ, #TPIN
            wxpin   FRQperiod, #TPIN
            wypin   FRQphase, #TPIN
            dirh    #TPIN
    
    'Use accurate crystal oscillator and PLL instead of RCFAST
            hubset  ##CLK_MODE      'power up external 20 MHz crystal and PLL
            waitx   ##25_000_000/100    '10 ms pause for stablising
            hubset  ##CLK_MODE | XSEL   'switch over to PLL as system clock source
    
    'Twiddle thumbs while smartpin does job
    .pause
            rep #1, #0
            waitx   #500
    
            jmp #\.pause
            jmp #\.pause
            jmp #\.pause
            jmp #\.pause
    
    
    '--------------------------------------------------------------
    FRQphase    long    $8000_0000      '32-bit fraction of oscillation
    FRQperiod   long    500 / XDIVP     'sysclocks per fraction ( sysclock/1000 )
    '--------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
            org
    'Twiddle thumbs while smartpin does job
    pause
            rep #1, #0
            waitx   #500
    
            jmp #\pause
            jmp #\pause
            jmp #\pause
            jmp #\pause
    
    
    
    con
    ' Clock modes: %0000_000e_dddddd_mmmmmmmmmm_pppp_cc_ss
        XOSC        = %10               ' OSC    ' %00=OFF, %01=OSC, %10=15pF, %11=30pF
        XSEL        = %11               ' XI+PLL ' %00=rcfast(20+MHz), %01=rcslow(~20KHz), %10=XI(5ms), %11=XI+PLL(10ms)
        XPPPP       = ((XDIVP>>1) + 15) & $F    ' 1->15, 2->0, 4->1, 6->2...30->14
        CLOCKFREQ   = round(float(XTALFREQ) / float(XDIV) * float(XMUL) / float(XDIVP))
        CLK_MODE    = 1<<24 | (XDIV-1)<<18 | (XMUL-1)<<8 | XPPPP<<4 | XOSC<<2
    
    
        SP_OUT      = (%1 << 6)         ' enable digital output when DIR operates smartpin
        SPM_NCO_FREQ    = %00110_0 |SP_OUT      ' NCO frequency, X[15:0] = base period, Z += Y, OUT = Z[31]
        SPM_PULSES  = %00100_0 |SP_OUT |(1<<7)      ' pulse/cycle output, X[31:16] = base period, X[15:0] = duty of period
    
Sign In or Register to comment.