Shop OBEX P1 Docs P2 Docs Learn Events
My first P2 PCB (it's finally done!) - Page 2 — Parallax Forums

My first P2 PCB (it's finally done!)

2

Comments

  • RaymanRayman Posts: 13,891
    edited 2019-11-15 15:01
    That was it!

    Ran jumper from Test to ground and added 10k pullup resistor on RESn.

    The only other issue I have at the moment is that my micro-USB connector did not import correctly from Diptrace.
    The feedthrough slots became just holes that are too small...
    But, I just got a replacement from SnapEDA, should be all better.
  • Nice to know! Now it is only a matter of doing a demo.

    Kind regards, Samuel Lourenço
  • Congrats! Always enlightening/fun to follow your projects.
  • RaymanRayman Posts: 13,891
    Just for fun, here's my low cost production line:
    1512 x 2016 - 1M
    1512 x 2016 - 998K
    1512 x 2016 - 855K
    2016 x 1512 - 1M
  • RaymanRayman Posts: 13,891
    I'll put my revised Eagle files for this board in the top post.
  • RaymanRayman Posts: 13,891
    edited 2019-11-15 16:27
    Flash chip doesn't seem to be working...
    Maybe because I'm using Microchip SST26VF064 instead of Winbond W25Q128?
  • RaymanRayman Posts: 13,891
    Eric Smith's LED code works!
    Seems P2 I/O is OK.
    2016 x 1512 - 1M
  • PublisonPublison Posts: 12,366
    edited 2019-11-15 16:50
    I did up reference schematics and pcb layout early last year as part of doing up a datasheet just so people wouldn't get caught. Guess this is a case of "RTM" :) The link is in bold in my sig but there are many documents there too.

    Peter did all the work for you a year ago in black and white and pretty colors.

    https://www.dropbox.com/s/mlbr1kcet47aowo/P2 shortform.pdf?dl=0

  • RaymanRayman Posts: 13,891
    Testing HDMI with Chip's example in documentation...

    Bird image is not coming out of the transporter exactly right.
    2016 x 1512 - 810K
  • Peter JakackiPeter Jakacki Posts: 10,193
    edited 2019-11-15 23:56
    My Dropbox link shares all my P2 files totally openly, including all my notes, documentation, schematics, PCBs, photos, code etc etc. It's all there. However here is a png of my current schematic for reference. (ignore pin 2 connection, it goes to 1.8V)
    P2D2R3%20schematic.png
    2177 x 1346 - 602K
  • roglohrogloh Posts: 5,167
    edited 2019-11-16 01:11
    Rayman wrote: »
    Testing HDMI with Chip's example in documentation...

    Bird image is not coming out of the transporter exactly right.

    Hmm that's weird. I haven't seen anything like that in my experiments..

    What pin mode signal levels are you using? I looked at some of Chip's code which I had a problem with initially and I thought the differential signal current seemed a bit low to get the drive required. I'm actually boosting up to a 3.3V swing which is most definitely breaking the TMDS electrical spec. The thing is that issue should cause dropouts or complete loss of sync, unless the TV you are using is buffering old data when the signal drops out. Seems more like a FIFO block wrap source address problem.
  • RaymanRayman Posts: 13,891
    Problem turned out to be a too advanced monitor...

    Worked right on a simpler monitor...
  • @Rayman

    Can you recommend someone who can solder the surface mount chip to a board. I will be embarking
    on my own boards soon.

    Thanks
  • RaymanRayman Posts: 13,891
    I don't know anybody who can do it for low cost... I've used screaming circuits for stuff.
    They are probably expensive though...
  • I just paste and place manually and pop it into a toaster oven for 4 minutes.
  • RaymanRayman Posts: 13,891
    The problem with hand soldering this one is the ground pad...
    If you made a couple big vias under the ground pad, you could probably solder it from the back side.
    After hand soldering the top.
    I like to use a lot of solder and then use solder wick to remove the excess...
  • RaymanRayman Posts: 13,891
    Just a note about the FT231X...

    You have to use FTDI's "FT Prog" utility to make the power enable and tx/rx led's work as intended...
    These are on the C0 .. C3 pins.
    Here is how I set them for this board (see image).

    There are some other things I probably should change such as "Max Bus Power" probably should be 500 mA instead of 90 mA.
    "Pull down IO Pins in USB Suspend" sounds like a good idea? Maybe not.

    624 x 729 - 27K
  • RaymanRayman Posts: 13,891
    It looks like maybe I could have used C2 to be a "BCD_Charger" pin to enable high current power from micro-USB port to the board.
  • RaymanRayman Posts: 13,891
    Was finally able to test out LSM9DS1 and RTC.
    I think that was the last thing.
    Everything works!

    But, I did make a mistake with the I2C address pins on the LSM9DS1.
    I should have grounded them, but instead left them floating.
    Fortunately, they appear to have a pullup (or at least act that way).
  • RaymanRayman Posts: 13,891
    edited 2020-02-25 14:22
    Shoot. About to order some new boards, but found a DRC error on my new micro-usb connector.
    Seems the side pads are shorting 5V pin to ground.
    I got this footprint and symbol from Digikey via SnapEDA (part# 609-4618-1-ND)
    Seems I need to manually make the pads less wide..
    1107 x 609 - 53K
  • RaymanRayman Posts: 13,891
    This is a really bizarre "feature" of Eagle...
    Seems there is a "restring" parameter in the Design Rules that will make Eagle automatically change the pad sizes of library components when you import them...
    Learn something new...

    Anyway, had to make this change to pad design rules to fix this part.
    Now, I have to check everything else to make sure this didn't break something else...
    817 x 472 - 18K
  • kwinnkwinn Posts: 8,697
    Rayman wrote: »
    Shoot. About to order some new boards, but found a DRC error on my new micro-usb connector.
    Seems the side pads are shorting 5V pin to ground.
    I got this footprint and symbol from Digikey via SnapEDA (part# 609-4618-1-ND)
    Seems I need to manually make the pads less wide..

    That's too bad. Any chance it could be "unshorted" with a dremel or small triangular file so you can at least use it to verify the rest of the board?
  • RaymanRayman Posts: 13,891
    edited 2020-02-25 15:07
    Fortunately, I didn't order these boards yet, was just running a final DRC check...
    This "restring" thing is horrible... The above % setting made the pads around my HDMI connector way too tiny... Increased back to 25% while leaving min at 4 mil and looks better now.

    Ugh... I had to go into the library and manually change hdmi connector pad diameters from "auto" to something reasonable to fix it.
  • RaymanRayman Posts: 13,891
    Ok, think I've got some new boards ready to order that pass DRC.
    Will hopefully be able to share proven Eagle design files for P2 soon.

    Doing two variants. Both lose the nunchuck and add an extra USB port.

    One will have a VGA connector. The other will have a Newhaven EVE2 display connector (hoping to test out 4-bit SPI intereface).
    1393 x 1097 - 223K
    1545 x 1069 - 239K
  • Cluso99Cluso99 Posts: 18,069
    You definitely need to check all footprints before you use them. That’s why many of us oldies use old pcb software with our own proven footprints.

    Even the so-called standards footprints can have problems. I recall when I was using my first 100 pin QFP and I went to the Australian Standards to find the recommended pad sizes etc. I found that they had based the pins on the wrong base (think it was based on metric but the pad pitch was actually imperial). Anyway, by the time you got to the 25th pin on the side, it was half a pad out. Rang our great standards department who said they copied the UK Standards. They had no intention of fixing the error!!! So much for paid standards publications. Fortunately I checked before using them.

    Moral of the story... Check everything before you use it.
  • evanhevanh Posts: 15,187
    There is multiple pitches for 100 pin QFP. They are all metric though: 0.4, 0.5 and 0.65 I think covers the 100 pin range.
  • Cluso99Cluso99 Posts: 18,069
    edited 2020-02-26 20:56
    It was a Xilinx FPGA back in the early 90’s and I am fairly sure it was actually based on something like .20” or .25” unlike the current stock of ICs. The reason I am fairly sure is we are metric and so the pitch in the standards was shown in metric but the chip was actually imperial. Remember 25-30 years ago most chips were designed in the US and so imperial was still predominantly used.
    Found the XC2064 PLCC68 package was imperial 0.050” imperial but haven’t been able to find the QFP100 spec.

    Actually it was designed around 1985. Unfortunately cannot get to the full data sheet on my iPad. IIRC I used the XC2064 and I hand routed my design to get max throughput - the Xilinx software back then let you do this. I still have a printout of this in my filing cabinet :)

    I used the FPGA to interface to the ICL System 25 Minicomputer processor bus backplane for a 16 port RS232 Serial Port card that I designed. One of my customers had 10 of my cards in one of his computers supporting around 120 remote terminals concurrently, located all over Australia via 9600 baud leased lines and Scitec Statistical Multiplexors.

    Would have loved a P2 back then :). Or even a P1 :) I used a pair of Z8681 with 8x Z8530 SCC’s and a Dual Port SRAM.
  • evanhevanh Posts: 15,187
    edited 2020-02-26 22:29
    I'm not sure QFP existed at all back then. It could have been the rare 100 pin PLCC, they went out of favour the moment QFP came online.

    EDIT: And PLCC's were usually socketed then too. So a surface mount CAD footprint could have been hard to come by.
  • evanhevanh Posts: 15,187
    edited 2020-02-27 00:01
    I looked at FPGAs in 1996 and remember reading about the Xilinx 6k series with its programming bus interface and fine grain approach for dynamic reconfiguration. It never matured any further though, and was already an EOL product even then. I do wonder if Xilinx ever plan to revisit the idea.
  • Cluso99Cluso99 Posts: 18,069
    Actually the FPGA I used in 1990 was XC2018 - a PLCC84. Here is a pic, plus part of the hand-routed FPGA printout.
    NL30A_4100.jpg
    NL30A_FPGA_4104.jpg

    The FPGA device that had the standards dimension problem was in fact from my 1995 8-port 336K modem card for the PC. I couldn't easily locate the schematic and the brochure we made isn't clear enough to see the FPGA marking and I didn't keep a sample. It's a Xilinx 160-pin QFP. pic attached
    8x336Modem_4102.jpg

    Certainly a trip down memory lane ;)
    378 x 504 - 115K
    605 x 807 - 174K
    576 x 478 - 156K
Sign In or Register to comment.