Shop OBEX P1 Docs P2 Docs Learn Events
Magnetic Tape Data Storage Breakthrough Will Make Your Hard Drive Seem Tiny — Parallax Forums

Magnetic Tape Data Storage Breakthrough Will Make Your Hard Drive Seem Tiny

http://gizmodo.com/magnetic-tape-data-storage-breakthrough-will-make-your-1797462392
The amount of data you can squeeze onto a hard drive continues to grow by leaps and bounds, with Seagate announcing a 60TB SSD late last year. But thanks to IBM and Sony, tape might still reign supreme when you need to archive massive amounts of data, as the companies have jointly developed a new kind of tape that can reportedly hold 201-gigabits, or roughly 25GB, per square inch.
...
IBM’s researchers developed a new read head just 48-nanometers in size that was capable of accurately reading the minuscule magnetic particles on Sony’s new tape, as well as new servo technology allowing for precise control of the tape as it flows through the machine. Accuracy and precision have to be improved as the magnetic particles holding the data get smaller and smaller.

Comments

  • No thanks on tape drives. Every one that I have had over the last 20 years would not read a tape after 5 years.
  • Cluso99Cluso99 Posts: 18,069
    The tape drives used on mainframes are very much superior to the ones used on PCs.

    But 200GB is not much these days, what with 3.5" 1TB USB 3.0 HDD for <$50.

    Most laptops these days have ~1TB HDDs. That's 5 tapes to backup the whole HDD !
    When it comes to backing up a server, it's going to require a lot of tapes!
  • According to the article:

    That's 25 GB per square inch!

    or 301 TB on a kilometer of tape.
  • Cluso99 wrote: »
    The tape drives used on mainframes are very much superior to the ones used on PCs.

    But 200GB is not much these days, what with 3.5" 1TB USB 3.0 HDD for <$50.

    Most laptops these days have ~1TB HDDs. That's 5 tapes to backup the whole HDD !
    When it comes to backing up a server, it's going to require a lot of tapes!

    100's of terabytes (TB) of storage, not gigabytes.
    But when you fill a cartridge with over a kilometer of this new tape, you can store 330TB of data in less space than a hard drive takes up.

  • MikeDYurMikeDYur Posts: 2,176
    edited 2017-08-03 13:07
    No thanks, had the cassette type a couple of times. Can't seem to find the cartridge system I had in the 90s, way too slow for today's data.
    1951 - UNISERVO
    1952 - IBM 7 track
    1958 - TX-2 Tape System
    1961 - IBM 7340 Hypertape
    1962 - LINCtape
    1963 - DECtape
    1964 - 9 Track
    1964 - Magnetic tape selectric typewriter
    1966 - 8-track tape[11]
    1972 - Quarter-inch cartridge (QIC)
    1975 - KC standard, Compact Cassette
    1976 - DC100
    1977 - Tarbell Cassette Interface
    1977 - Commodore Datasette
    1979 - DECtape II cartridge
    1979 - Exatron Stringy Floppy
    1981 - IBM PC Cassette Interface
    1983 - Sinclair ZX Microdrive
    1984 - Sinclair QL Microdrive
    1984 - Rotronics Wafadrive
    1984 - IBM 3480 cartridge
    1984 - Digital Linear Tape (DLT)
    1986 - SLR
    1987 - Data8
    1989 - Digital Data Storage (DDS) on Digital Audio Tape (DAT)
    1992 - Ampex DST
    1994 - Mammoth
    1995 - IBM 3590
    1995 - StorageTek Redwood SD-3
    1995 - Travan
    1996 - AIT
    1997 - IBM 3570 MP
    1998 - StorageTek T9840
    1999 - VXA
    2000 - StorageTek T9940
    2000 - LTO-1
    2003 - SAIT
    2003 - LTO-2
    2003 - 3592
    2005 - LTO-3
    2005 - TS1120
    2006 - T10000
    2007 - LTO-4
    2008 - TS1130
    2008 - T10000B
    2010 - LTO-5
    2011 - TS1140
    2011 - T10000C
    2012 - LTO-6
    2013 - T10000D
    2014 - TS1150
    2015 - LTO-7
    2017 - TS1155
Sign In or Register to comment.