Just purchased a PropScope

I was building some Arduino code the other day to interface with the WS2812b LED's. The code for the Propeller is pretty straight forward and thought it should be just as easy on the Arduino front.

The first problem was that I was using an STM32L board that runs at 80Mhz which is the same speed as the Propeller. None of libraries I looked at worked with that fast of a processor. The pin timing to drive these LED's is somewhat fussy.

So I setout to write some assembly code to drive the pin fast enough to drive the WS2812b when I notice that my DSO138 scope was not up to the challenge. It appears that a frequency that high is not going to work on this $20 scope. Its maximum sample rate stops at 1 Million sample per second.

I ended up writing slower code that was 100 times slower so that I could use my DSO138 to see the signal. I then upped the frequency of the code to drive the LED's. This for the most part worked. I had to do a little fixing of the code at that higher speed.

I then set my sites on a faster scope and notice that most of them stopped at the 1Mhz sample range. I was not going to spend the $1,000 price tag for a real scope which would kill my budget and not site well with my wife either.

I then took a second look at the PropScope which I thought at the time was a little pricey begin it was USB attached. I then took a closer look at the maximum sample rate which is said was up to 25Mhz. Hey, that is pretty good for a unit based on the Propeller chip. After looking at the schematic I see it was using some hardware to do the sampling and the Propeller to do the interfacing.

So I put it on my wish list as a item I wanted but thought I will site on it a while. To my surprise it went on sale and then on sale. I decided it's time to pull the trigger and see what I get.

Again I was impressed with what I got. Professional style probes and not just one but two. It also came with the PropScope DAC card which I was not expecting. The display software is quite nice as well and for looking at my WS2812b signal it was simple and easy to do. Very nice product I think.

Can't wait to figure out the other features of this product as I have other signal I need to break down.

It does look as though the software not being maintained anymore and some talk about making it open source but at this point the product works and works very well and for the price right now, its a steal.

Mike

Comments

  • 9 Comments sorted by Date Added Votes
  • PublisonPublison Posts: 9,411
    edited May 7 Vote Up0Vote Down
    Congrats on the purchase. I bought the first or second on when there were announced. Been a great scope.

    The DAC card has shipped with all scopes since the beginning.

    As far as software being Open Source in the future; not likely, since it is based on Hanno's Viewport which is still a product that Hanno sells:

    http://onerobot.org/products/viewport/
    Infernal Machine
  • The Propscope looks like a sweet device. The closed source software puts me off though.

    As for a real scope I too would balk at $1000 dollars. Can't really justify that for the tinkering I do.

    Luckily though, now a days you can get amazing scopes very cheaply.

    I got a Rigol DS1054Z. Four channels 1GSa/s, 50MHz bandwidth which can be had for 400 dollars.

    The neat thing about this is that the bandwidth can be unlocked with a firmware hack up to 100MHz. :)

    Of course what is missing is the 10 bit resolution, arbitrary waveform generator, and other features the Propscope provides.

  • Heater. wrote: »
    The Propscope looks like a sweet device. The closed source software puts me off though.

    As for a real scope I too would balk at $1000 dollars. Can't really justify that for the tinkering I do.

    Luckily though, now a days you can get amazing scopes very cheaply.

    I got a Rigol DS1054Z. Four channels 1GSa/s, 50MHz bandwidth which can be had for 400 dollars.

    The neat thing about this is that the bandwidth can be unlocked with a firmware hack up to 100MHz. :)

    Of course what is missing is the 10 bit resolution, arbitrary waveform generator, and other features the Propscope provides.
    Is the Rigol open source?

  • Of course not. It's a "real" oscilloscope. Can't expect much open source progress there anytime soon.

    Meanwhile at the low end there are open source options.

    The redpitaya is one: https://redpitaya.com/. Perhaps a bit pricey.

    There is a USB scope, somewhat like the Analog Discovery that popped up recently. With open source software. Damned if I can recall what it's called now...let me think...


  • TorTor Posts: 1,699
    Yeah, the Rigols look nice. Closed source, obviously, but the difference from the Propscope is that the Rigol is self-contained - you don't need anything else to use it. With the Propscope you need a Windows PC. So in that case it matters.

    It's also possible to come across free or cheap old scopes. I got a 400MHz Gould digital scope for free, it's very nice (and big), does basically everything I need, but it takes forever to boot. Not what I was used to from my background of good old HP and Tek analog scopes.
  • My old Tek scope took a few minutes to boot. It takes ages for all those tubes to warm up!

    I saw one the other day, next to the PDP-1 in the Computer History Museum.
  • The lights must have dimmed when you turned that on.

    I have an old Heathkit scope I built back in the day too. Only one tube in that unit.


  • Heater. wrote: »

    There is a USB scope, somewhat like the Analog Discovery that popped up recently. With open source software. Damned if I can recall what it's called now...let me think...


    http://forums.parallax.com/discussion/166486/adalm2000-a-usb-12bit-adcs-dacs-100-msps-2-channels-comming-soon-for-99#latest
    Infernal Machine
  • Bingo, that's the one.
Sign In or Register to comment.