View Full Version : First Post! (Question: Air Pressure Sensor)
jblaven
05-23-2005, 06:10 AM
Hey Guys,
Man, I think I am hooked!· Every morning, I think I have another idea on how to use the Basic Stamp.· It doesn't mean I actually understand how to make my ideas work.·http://forums.parallax.com/images/smilies/eyes.gif
I would like to know where to find an air pressure sensor that will work with the Basic Stamp.· I would like to compare "Positive" and "Negative" pressure of two areas.
Any ideas or suggestions are greatly appreciated!
Thanks,
Joe
What range of pressure do you want to compare?
K
Chris Savage
05-23-2005, 08:05 AM
Hello,
·· Depending on the amount of pressure you want to measure, you could try the PRGPAL.· A link is posted to the product page on our website where you can view the manual and determine if this is a viable solution for you.
http://www.parallax.com/detail.asp?product_id=28025
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Chris Savage
Parallax Tech Support
csavage@parallax.com (mailto:csavage@parallax.com)
jblaven
05-23-2005, 08:19 AM
KenM said...
What range of pressure do you want to compare?
K
Whatever the atmosphere pressure is at sea level.· Nothing like a tire under XXX PSI...· Just the difference between two rooms.
Hope that makes sense.
Thanks,
Joe
jblaven
05-23-2005, 08:24 AM
Chris Savage (Parallax) said...
Hello,
·· Depending on the amount of pressure you want to measure, you could try the PRGPAL.· A link is posted to the product page on our website where you can view the manual and determine if this is a viable solution for you.
http://www.parallax.com/detail.asp?product_id=28025
Thanks Chris!
I will have to read the PDFs to see if it will work for me.· I·looking to read the pressure of one area, and compare it to another.· I guess you could say one reading would be relative to the other.· If it will tell me which one is under more pressure, then it should work.·
I don't need an exact reading, just the ability to compare and say Area 1 is under more/less (positive/negative) pressure as compared to Area 2.
Thanks again,
Joe